30 DAYS OF NIGHT: DARK DAYS Review - Mania.com

Film Opinion

Mania Grade: C-

10 Comments | Add


Rate & Share:


Related Links:



  • Title: 30 Days of Night: Dark Days
  • Rated: R
  • Cast: Kiele Sanchez, Rys Corio, Harold Perinneau, Diora Baird, Mia Kirshner
  • Writer: Steve Niles, Ben Ketai
  • Director: Ben Ketai
  • Distributor: Sony Home Entertainment
  • Original Year of Release: 2010
  • Extras: See Below
  • Series: 30 Days of Night: Dark Days


Sequel to the 2007 Hit Misses the Mark

By Tim Janson     October 13, 2010
Source: Mania

© Mania

30 Days of Night: Dark Days is the direct-to-video sequel to the 2007 film 30 Days of NightThe key words here are “direct-to-video” which often, but not always, has a connotation of being inferior.  Unfortunately that is the case with this dismal sequel that casts aside everything that made the original so enjoyable to go for a “Blade” style action film.


The Movie

It has been a years since the clan of vampires nearly wiped out the town of Barrow , AK.  Stella Oleson (this time played by Kiele Sanchez) is still grieving over the death of her husband, Eben, who sacrificed himself to save the town.  Of course, no one believes the real story about what happened in Barrow.  Stella is on a crusade, touring the country at various speaking engagements, trying to convince people that vampires do exist.  At one stop in Los Angeles , she rigs the auditorium with ultra-violet lighting, as she suspects the vampires are keeping an eye on her.

This throws the audience into a panic as they see a couple of vampires burn to a crisp, and they run out of the theater.  Stella returns to her motel where she meets some unexpected guests…a trio of vampire hunters: Paul (Coiro), Amber (Baird) and Todd (Lost’s Harold Parrineau).  They have been hunting vampires for sometime and have arrived to recruit Stella.  They plan to assault the stronghold of the vampire queen Lilith, the one responsible for the attack on Barrow.

Reportedly Melissa George, who played Stella in the original film, left the production three days into shooting.  Good move on her part.  Dark Days is a poorly acted and sloppily filmed sequel.  These may be the dumbest vampire hunters ever.  Getting a tip on the queen’s location, they delve deep underground an industrial complex, FAR removed from light or the chance of escape and walk right into a trap.  They lock themselves into a room to “hide” and apparently the vampires get bored and just leave them alone.  Amber blames Stella for the disaster even though THEY show up in her room to recruit her.  No, logic is not one of the film’s strengths.

What made the original so good was the claustrophobic tone.  The people were trapped in Barrow like one of those nested eggs.  They were stuck in town, shut off from the outside world, hiding out in buildings and then hiding out in attics of buildings, just hoping to survive until the Sun returned while the vampires toyed with them like catnip.  None of that suspense is on display as director Ben Ketai goes for action more than horror and that’s the downfall of the film.  Rather than a horror film this is an action film where the protagonists happen to be vampires.

The only intriguing twist was the introduction of the Vampire Queen Lilith but she does little more than stand about scowling with her black eyes.  Apparently she intends to return to Barrow and finish the job which makes little sense when there are certainly many other little towns they could attack without raising the suspicion of a return to Barrow.

Sanchez, whose bulk of her work has been in TV, simply isn’t strong enough to carry a lead role and Parrineau is essentially wasted.  There’s loads of blood that should satisfy gore hounds but 30 Days of Night: Dark Days is a major letdown for the many fans of the first film and comic series.


Blu-Ray Extras

Audio Commentary with Director Ben Ketai and Producer J.R. Young

Graphic Inspirations: Comic to Film – An interactive feature that allows you to scroll through various panels from the graphic novel and click on your controller to see the corresponding scene from the film that features interviews with the Director and writers. There are seven scenes in all to examine.

The Gritty Realism of Dark Days (10:07) – A short, behind-the-scenes featurettes that focuses on the dark and edgy industrialized look of the film including a look at set design and make-up effects. Also features cast interviews.


Showing items 1 - 10 of 10
revisitingnixon 10/13/2010 11:54:19 AM

I actually liked the first one. Definitely need to check this one out.

Chris Beveridge 10/13/2010 12:27:30 PM

 I really liked the first one but this one loses all of the things that made the first one work. Really, really not good.

grenesto 10/13/2010 1:38:45 PM

I really liked the first one and was kind of sad Melissa George dropped out from the sequel, because I really like her, but definitely it was for the best!! This movie sucked and it would be a shame to see Melissa George in this terrible excuse to cash in from some fans of the original. Don’t waste your time!

scytheofluna 10/13/2010 2:48:03 PM

To the reviewer:

Did you bother reading the graphic novel prior to writing this review?  I haven't seen the film myself, but from what you describe it sounds like a pretty faithful adaptation.  Now, I won't say Dark Days is as good as the original, but it's a great book, and this film sounds like it stuck pretty close to the source material.

Read the book, and judge the film as an adaptation.  Nobody cares what the average film viewer is going to get out of it.  Comic book movies are made for comic book fans, and we like faithful adaptations.

tjanson 10/13/2010 4:32:58 PM

The fact that it may have been a faithful adaptation doesn't make it a good film.  Films and graphic novels have completely different tones.  The original film was also a faithful adaptation.  Being faithful doesn't make up for poor acting, plot holes, and lapses in logic. 

Also, you are completely wrong when you say that comic book movies are made for comic book fans.  Movies are made to appeal to the widest possible audience.  This is why villains like the Joker and Lex Luthor have been used so often in films.  The general, non-comic fans know them as opposed to villains like Ras Al ghul or Darkseid.  i think the producers and film studios VERY much care what the average film viewer is going to get out of it.  They better if they intend to try and make a profit.

mike10 10/13/2010 6:50:14 PM

Isn't there a 30 Days of Night and X-Files crossover comic coming out? Why not adapt that to a movie? It would probably be a hell of alot better than this mess and everybody loves Mulder and Scully, it's just that last X-File movie sucked badly. 

ponyboy76 10/16/2010 1:58:33 PM

I saw this the other day and compared to the first one, it paled in comparison. Most of the characters were 1 dimensional and even though I love me some Mia Kirshner, she didn't do much for a big bad villain and that cop was annoying. Reminded me of a bad episode of Blade the series.

ultrazilla2000 10/21/2010 11:23:25 PM

For a direct to DVD sequel...I thought it was pretty well done actually.  Far better than most.  People need to consider the lower budget while comparing the two...something they forget.  For what they had, this sequel was really well done.  Was it perfect?  No, but neither was the original!

liujinhui 10/27/2010 1:24:57 AM

Hello,everybody,the good shoping place,the new season approaching, click in. Let's facelift bar!

===== http://www.fashionstyle2.com =====

Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33


Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $33

Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&g) $33

Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16

Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30

LKC32 10/27/2010 8:19:27 PM

 I watched the movie. It's quite entertaining to me. Only that vampire queen, she has no special ability but the vampires are listening to her.



You must be logged in to leave a comment. Please click here to login.