Movie Review
10 Comments | Add a Comment

0


30 DAYS OF NIGHT

By: Abbie Bernstein
Date: Friday, October 19, 2007

Based on the first in what has become a series of graphic novels by Steve Niles and Ben Templesmith, 30 Days of Night is the story of what happens when a band of vampires invades a tiny town in northernmost Alaska, where the sun goes down for a month in midwinter. Director David Slade has done an extremely good job of recreating the look and feel of graphic novel artwork without going into Sin City-like replication. 30 Days of Night is cool (pardon the pun) to look at and somewhat fun to watch. On the other hand, parts of it don’t stand up to any scrutiny and, more importantly, it is surprisingly not scary.
 
In Barrow, Alaska, the population dwindles to 152 hardy souls during the annual 30-day night. Make that 153, as fire marshal Stella Oleson (Melissa George), estranged wife of town sheriff Eben Oleson (Josh Hartnett) is stuck there after missing the last flight out. It’s been a rough day – somebody has vandalized the town’s helicopter, killed every sled dog in the vicinity, committed other acts of sabotage and the lone stranger (Ben Foster) Eben has managed to capture isn’t saying much that makes sense. Then true night falls, and with it comes a band of fast-moving, black-eyed, long-clawed predators with a thirst for human blood, led by Marlow (Danny Huston), a guttural, melancholy and angry monster.
 
There are some great set pieces, with vamps moving with blinding speed and having a lot of fun in their stalking and killing. Slade and casting director have also come up with some intriguing faces to play the vamps, so that they look unusual beyond the fangs and claws. Stunt coordinator Allan Poppleton stages some really exciting vehicle collisions, crashes and flips, at least one of which produces a good jump.
 
And here’s where the problems come in. We don’t get enough on any of the characters to care about any of them specifically, and director Slade indicates and/or outright shows the vampires’ positions throughout, so that we feel neither mounting suspense nor even the fear of a “gotcha” scare. The relationship between Eben and Stella is given exactly enough friction to feel time-consuming and irritating without being involving – if our main characters are going to deal with a bad marriage, it should either get something more than some fairly rote sulky dialogue that doesn’t affect the plot before they inevitably work together, or be dispensed with altogether. Then there’s the matter of numbers. The filmmakers make a point of telling us exactly how many humans are in Barrow. We can see between ten and fifteen vampires in the gang. Given their habits of mass slaughter, how is it that they don’t wipe out everybody at once? Even allowing for supernatural suspension of disbelief, it also seems amazing that the vamps can’t sniff out a mass of unwashed humans who are hiding together in one place for days in such a small town.
 
The upshot is that 30 Days of Night doesn’t hang together with great logic or much emotional involvement even as it’s unspooling. It does, however, contain some intriguing imagery and tickles the imagination just enough to make us wonder if perhaps a sequel may get it right.

Related Products
User Reviews
Comments/Responses
1
scytheofluna • Oct 19, 2007, 09:44am •
Wow, this review is contrary to nearly everything else I've read about this film. I think maybe I'll ignore it and think for myself.

muchdrama • Oct 19, 2007, 01:30pm •
Ha! Nice, Scythe. I think I'll do the same.

scoundrel • Oct 19, 2007, 01:37pm •
That's interesting, because this sounds exactly like a lot of the reviews I've read elsewhere. To me it sounds like the made a faithful adaptation of the comic, cool setting and concept, gore, and characters that are less than realized. I might check this one out on DVD...

agentkooper • Oct 19, 2007, 02:34pm •
I was just in Barrow this week and the general mood in town is that the people behind this movie can go f**k themselves. The Barrow I saw and the Barrow in the previews are two very different places. The population year-round is 6,000, if it dropped below that oil production would dry up. And with oil jobs comes big money. They have an indoor football field that was just finished. There is harldy any snow, just a few inches a year and what does fall builds up in drifts against buildings.

Not really nitpicking (I understand it is fiction), just reporting on the general feeling in the town where the movie is based.

GentlemenDeath • Oct 19, 2007, 03:27pm •
I am going to see this movie on Sunday...Regardless of people's reviews and what the town of Barrow thinks of it.

I like to read reviews, but if people say it sucks or does not suck, I plan on seeing the movie and judging it for myself. This movie could have got an F here at mania and I would still plan on going to see it....

superfrank78 • Oct 19, 2007, 06:35pm •
I saw this at a midnight showing and it is easily the halloween film to see this season..maybe the reviewer didn't like it or they were in search of something other than a fun,entertaining popcorn flick- no it isn't a deep poignant film with lots of gutwrenching emotion...it's a friggin' vampire movie and one of the best to come around in awhile- at least until "I am Legend". So enjoy it for what it is...worth the 10 bucks.

hfc7036 • Oct 20, 2007, 09:10am •
I saw this movie last night. It's basically what happens when blade ISN'T around to fight vampires. It was great because the directors really left a lot of mystery about the film. A lot of what if's and what next questions arose. The problem was that the movie didn't introduce a new aspect to the vampires. This is a monster movie with creatures that are pretty scary and funky lookin'. The acting was really good. I had shakes throughout the film, which is what I want when I watch horror movies, and another great thing is... SUBTEXT. Lots and lots of it in these genres is PERFECT. Don't explain everything. If the characters have to figure it out, let us figure it out too. That's exactly what this movie did. I give it a B

raa2001 • Oct 20, 2007, 10:35am •
just go see the damn movie and judge for yourselves...

WISEGUY562 • Oct 20, 2007, 03:22pm •
Saw it Friday morning and loved it. It's close enough to the book and the changes were o.k. The look and the feel of the movie was just the way I felt when I read the book. The only thing I would've changed is more gore, but that's me.

skoora • Oct 21, 2007, 08:05pm •
Saw it this morning and it was worth the $5 for morning matinee. As far as Vampire movies go this is one of the better ones in many years. I think if someone with a lot more gravitas or "charisma" had been cast in Hartnett's place it would have resonated a lot more. He's a C hair away from the depth of Keannu Reeves. The vampires look very good but I am tired of all vampires throughout recent movies having to hiss and move their head like an insect. That gets really old for me. Danny Huston was good as Marlow, their leader. I didn't recognize him in the previews.

1
Login to post a comment!