Movie Review

Mania Grade: B

13 Comments | Add

 

Rate & Share:

0
 

Related Links:

 

Info:

  • Reviewed Format: Theatrical Release
  • Rated: R
  • Stars: Gerard Butler, Lena Headey, David Wenham, Dominic West, Rodrigo Santoro
  • Writers: Zack Snyder & Kurt Johnstad and Michael B. Gordon, based on the graphic novel by Frank Miller and Lynn Varley
  • Director: Zack Snyder
  • Distributor: Warner Bros.

"300"

By Abbie Bernstein     March 09, 2007


Gerard Butler as Leonidas in Warner Bros. Pictures' 300
© Warner Bros

300 is good, bloody fun, though it often reaches for both emotional and philosophical effects that are unearned. Director Zack Snyder and his co-screenwriters Kurt Johnstad and Michael B. Gordon have adapted the Frank Miller/Lynn Varley graphic novel with a good amount of visual fidelity and have hewed to some of the facts about the historical Battle of Thermopylae. 

For those who missed the history lesson, this famous conflict is a tale of a pre-Christian-era clash between the Spartan King Leonidas and three hundred of his best warriors against the might of the vast armies commanded by King Xerxes, self-proclaimed god-on-Earth of the Persian Empire. Amazingly, Leonidas’ forces held a pass known as “the Hot Gates” for several days, despite being insanely outnumbered. 300 gives us the battle, the events that lead up to it and some Spartan political intrigue during it. The focus is King Leonidas (Gerard Butler), who responds violently when the emissary of King Xerxes (Rodrigo Santoro), arrives in Sparta demanding surrender. Xerxes is poised to invade and Leonidas believes that the Spartans may be able to defend their territory, and all of Greece, by virtue of their superiority as warriors. When he cannot get a blessing to actually go to war from the priests, he takes 300 men as “bodyguards” and goes out for “a stroll.” 

The combination of live actors and CGI backgrounds is very striking, as is the look of the film overall. Snyder goes between extreme desaturation, washing scenes in grays and yellows (the look is reminiscent of not only Robert Rodriguez’s film adaptation of Miller’s Sin City, but also Pitch Black), and very saturated full color. For that matter, the look of the warriors is remarkable – the actors and what one guesses is an army of trainers deserve a lot of credit for making a whole lot of men look good while fighting in what amounts to leather Speedos, red capes, the occasional helmet and nothing else. This seems unlikely battle gear, but nobody seems the least self-conscious (though it would be interesting to see an outtake reel). The Persians’ varied armor is splendid, varied and malevolent-looking, going for and usually achieving the Darth Vader effect with all sorts of menacing invention. 

As for the fight scenes, Snyder simply creates a great “wow” factor, with huge masses of people, arrows, weapons and impressive geysers of blood providing images that have powerful impact both in motion and as still frames. He borrows a bit from Peter Jackson in the look of the screen-filling armies and their giant beasts of war – the imagery is true to Miller, but the way it works on film inevitably reminds us of Lord of the Rings. 

Even without the comparison to Jackson’s adaptation of J.R.R. Tolkien, though, it’s hard not to notice that 300 keeps going for both tragedy and message that it hasn’t backed up in the preceding drama. Xerxes is a tyrant and we see Leonidas being a good husband and father and a general who is both compassionate and inspiring, but what exactly is he referring to when he bellows about “freedom”? Historically correct as it is, since what we’re told first off about the Spartans is that they practice infanticide on any male children who don’t look like they’ll make good warriors, they keep slaves, are under some thrall to a body of unhealthy priests, etc., and we’re not told exactly what Xerxes does (apart from throw orgies and literally step all over his slaves), this has the ring of hollow rhetoric. We don’t need to know exactly how Sparta works to be impressed with the titular 300, but since its moral superiority is being preached throughout the film, some evidence of this apart from the buffness of its fighters would help support what we’re being told. Likewise, our overly helpful narrator keeps telling us what characters are feeling, which is not only redundant (when we see Leonidas awake at night among his troops, we can figure out for ourselves that he’s thinking of the next day’s battle, thanks) but finally actually makes us suspicious – if the filmmakers feel that they need to explain what we’re seeing to such an extent, maybe they’re not showing us as much as we think we’re getting onscreen. Apart from Leonidas, we don’t get much sense of the warriors as characters – they’ve all pretty much go the same hell-for-leather attitude – so when anything happens to them as individuals, we don’t experience a sense of loss. Ironically, Snyder’s remake of Dawn of the Dead, because it never trumpeted its emotional moments, had a lot more sense of humanity and genuine grief. 

Butler has got a really tough role here – he’s required to spend a good deal of it yelling at the top of his lungs – but he pulls it off as well as it can be done, and in the quieter moments projects a sense of charismatic, thoughtful compassion. Lena Headey as his devoted, spirited queen is both regal and sexy, and Dominic West is fine as an arrogant politician. David Wenham (Faramir in Lord of the Rings) seems suitably orator-like as the Spartan chosen to tell the tale and Santoro has a touch of otherworldliness as Xerxes. 

Another observation: while no doubt true to the Miller/Varley original, one does start to wonder why all the good guys are white (actual Spartans would look Greek, not Anglo-Saxon) and all the bad guys are black, Middle Eastern and Asian.  

The bottom line is, 300 is striking-looking, fast-moving, bloody comic book fun and works on that level. When it aspires to deliver a message and/or reach the heart, it falls short.

MOVIES REVIEWS

Comments (8) | Bangs (0)
MANIA INTERVIEW & REVIEW:...
Comments (8) | Bangs (0)
MOVIE REVIEW- Valkyrie
Comments (6) | Bangs (1)
DVD REVIEW- Death Race
Comments (3) | Bangs (0)
MOVIE REVIEW #2- THE SPIRIT
Comments (4) | Bangs (0)
MOVIE REVIEW #1- THE SPIRIT
Comments (12) | Bangs (1)
MOVIE REVIEW- The Day the Earth...
Comments (16) | Bangs (0)
PUNISHER: WAR ZONE - The Mania...
Comments (5) | Bangs (1)
Review: WANTED on DVD
Comments (10) | Bangs (0)
MOVIE REVIEW- TRANSPORTER 3
Comments (3) | Bangs (0)
DVD Review of The Man from...

COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

Showing items 1 - 10 of 13
1 2 >  >>  
fenngibbon 3/9/2007 4:09:42 AM
"Another observation: while no doubt true to the Miller/Varley original, one does start to wonder why all the good guys are white (actual Spartans would look Greek, not Anglo-Saxon) and all the bad guys are black, Middle Eastern and Asian." From what little I've seen the Spartans in the film don't look all that different from modern day Greeks (though maybe they should, since then Greece has experienced several invasions and the various ethnicities have intermixed) but I'll take your word for it since you've seen the whole film. Did they at least avoid having anyone in there who would look more comfortable sailing the fjords of Norway? But is it any surprise that the denizens of the Persian Empire, which stretched from India to Egypt, would have people who looked Asian, Middle Eastern, and African?
JC1783 3/9/2007 8:21:10 AM
Uhh...actually, ethnographically speaking, the ancient Greeks were more or less caucasian looking, they would appear much as in the film just as their own art and sculpture themselves reveal. Lighter skin, lighter eyes, lighter hair. They would not resemble the modern day Greeks any more really than modern day Italians resemble ancient Romans. There were too many subsequent invasions from the Semitic peoples of Asian minor for that. (It's also inaccurate to identify whites as being "Anglo-Saxons." Celts and Franks and and Scandinavians and Slavs and a host of other Indo-European ethnic groupings are just as Caucasian.) Yes, the enslaved peoples of the vast Persian empire would have been much more racially diverse than the small islands of the Agean.
scytheofluna 3/9/2007 11:28:50 AM
I must declare my wholehearted appreciation for the educated responses regarding the ethnicity of the actors in the film. The races are in no way chosen as a reflection of "good guy= white dude" "bad guy= black dude", the historical facts regarding the parties present at the battle are reflected in the actors chosen to play the roles. We can't change or be responsible for who fought who a millennium ago. Given the number of invasions into Greek and Roman territory in the numerous centuries that have passed, along with the natural immigration and assimilation of dozens of other cultures, it's inconceivable that people would look exactly the same today as they did centuries ago. The person who mentioned references to art of the era was dead on. I'm largely of Greek heritage and I'm not coloured like many native Greeks are today. If I was in better physical shape, I wouldn't have looked out of place as "random Spartan #26", based on my appearance. It's certainly admirable to be concerned about race issues, but that has to be tempered with respect to historical accuracy. Political correctness is noble, but honesty and understanding and communication are far more productive in my opinion, and even political correctness has a danger of applying stereotypes. It's not our job to censor history for the sake of not offending someone.
sharpe95th 3/9/2007 12:07:13 PM
scytheofluna: "Political correctness is noble, but honesty and understanding and communication are far more productive in my opinion, and even political correctness has a danger of applying stereotypes. It's not our job to censor history for the sake of not offending someone." Thank you. I have never read a more apt observation of political correctness and its flaws (and virtous intent) without the rancor or bitterness of someone who feels their "supremacy" is once again being "trampled" on. You rock. And for someone to make observations about a movie (When Star Wars came out there was a discussion about why all the good guys were white and the main bad guy was in black), be it Jackson's LoTR, 300 or Star Wars is LOOKING for grievances to justify their own misgivings--and not make an observation about THE reality of a movie's premise. Wish we could look beyond color and just enjoy the hell out of life.
BryanWay 3/9/2007 1:19:10 PM
I'd just like to say I think this guy pretty much hit the nail on the head with his review of the movie. The minus my personal review had is as a result of the attempts to make the CG backgrounds look too epic throughout the movie in addition to essentially what this guy said. This is an excellent, balanced review.
Merin 3/9/2007 7:30:55 PM
I found 300 to be an absolutely amazing film. I had no problem with anything in it at all - I went in knowing it was a comic-book, fictionalized version of history, and looked to enjoy it. I did, more than I hoped. Ethnicity has already been responded to, but as a student of history I concur that the racial make-up of the two armies was very appropriate. The one negative that the reviewer points out that I have to agree with is the Spartans shouting about freedom. She's right - from what the film reveals, the only difference in their "freedom" is that the Spartans don't carry their King around on a ten ton throne. Spartans, historically, are probably the worst examples of "liberty" or "freedom" in Ancient Greece - but compared to the Persian empire, well, no still not a great example. Most of the "conquered" lands of the Persians were allowed to keep their cultures, religions, and rulers and just pay tribute - uhm, Greeks did the same thing to each other. After Athens leads the Greeks to win the war at the naval Battle of Salamis, Athens becomes de facto leaders of the Greek peninsula and soon demands tribute from the other city states. So the cries of "freedom" ring false - Spartans fought for the glory of Sparta first, and for the glory of Greeks second, and for freedom - uhm - not really.
chemikillgod 3/9/2007 9:41:55 PM
"The one negative that the reviewer points out that I have to agree with is the Spartans shouting about freedom. She's right - from what the film reveals, the only difference in their "freedom" is that the Spartans don't carry their King around on a ten ton throne." Yep. I was going to go in here to say this. Sparta actually was very much an oligarchy. I would have been really really annoyed if they even used 'democracy'. They actually had a beef with the Athenians because they didn't like the direction that Athens' philosophy was taking Greece, which was slowly moving toward forms of more democractic rule.
smegforbrain 3/9/2007 11:26:07 PM
Well, hollow cries of justice, freedom, and all that stuff aside, the movie was bloody @#$%'ing brilliant. And just plain bloody. :)
whytedragon 3/10/2007 1:40:32 AM
This movie was fantastic. As one poster stated, I went into this movie knowing it wasnt going to be historically 100% accurate and enjoyed the whole film. I do disagree with the review where it stated at the end that this film failed to stir the heart. I personally felt moved all different directions throughout the movie as the story unfolded. I think alot of people that post here look for way to much in a movie and dont go to movies anymore simply to be entertained. Its like they are just hoping to find something wrong to flame on a internet forum to make their lives seem better I guess lol. BTW very nicely stated posts regarding the ethic issue in the movie.
Merin 3/10/2007 2:19:20 AM
You know what I'm hating? All these movie critics saying the same "video-game violence" "lifeless CGI backgrounds" "story-less boring action" and the like. It's not their thing. I get it. Stop insulting me. So many of these reviews seem to assume that if you aren't a twelve year-old boy with no friends and logging 100 hours per week on your XBOX that you'll find this movie empty tripe. Not every adult, educated, intelligent movie-goer wants to see The Queen or Little Miss Sunshine.
1 2 >  >>