I only see 6 reasons. Two of the reasons are indie films, and not Hollywood.









I only see 6 reasons. Two of the reasons are indie films, and not Hollywood.
The list talks about movies that were released this year so I don't understand why Foundation Trilogy is listed and Shutter Island got pushed back to 2010. Not to mention that The Foundation will be directed by Emmerich and that's reason alone to make you not believe.
If you were going to include 2010 entries then the list can't be complete without Nolan's Inception.
From the current list, Foundation Trilogy should've been replaced with The Hurt Locker, an excellent film released this summer.
INGLORIOUS left me cold, mainly for its celebration of torture (and for making the Basterds little better than terrorists) but I have to agree that Waltz's performance was utterly amazing.
And DISTRICT NINE reminded me of some of the great sci-fi from the 60s and 70s (and that is meant as a compliment). Unfortunately, haven't had the chance to see MOON.
No point in trying to fight change - it is inevitable - but it does seem that, in large part, the movie business today is all about a huge opening weekend, a few fast weeks of making $, and moving on. Movies aimed at smaller niches don't seem to have a lot of opportunity in that kind of set-up, and few movies are going to get the opportunity to develop word of mouth over time.
Shadow
PS - The previews for SHUTTER ISLAND didn't do much for me. Perhaps totally unfair, but the preview looked, to me, like the movie was very much a "buy the numbers" affair. Lets see... might the asylum director have a sinister secret? Think Ben Kingsley's creepy head doctor might be up to no good? And so forth... The movie itself MAY be very good, and there may be plot twists that put a lie to the preview... just saying that the preview itself didn't make ISLAND look like it is going to offer any real surprises.
I wish Hollywood would, more often, cast "against type". For example, this past week, "THE FUGITIVE" was on TV (Harrison Ford / Tommy Lee Jones movie). I recall seeing it in the theater, and enjoying it. However, as soon as I saw who was cast as Ford's "good friend" at the hospital, I figured the character was going to turn out to be a creep. Why? Because the actor playing the friend almost always plays the creep - and often the kind of creep who appears friendly and decent at first. He is, undeniably, very good at it. I could totally see someone saying - "Hey, lets cast X in this role... he is great as the apparently friendly guy who turns out to be bad!"... but the problem is that as soon as he pops up onscreen, you ASSUME he is no good.
Okay, so Ben Kingsley was Ghandi, granted... but as soon as I saw him in his white lab coat, talking in a chilly voice about the important work at the asylum, etc...well...LOL (hey, for all I know, he will turn out to be a swell guy! )...
I think it's dangerous to put so much hope in films that haven't been released yet, no matter how much potential it seems to have. I simply say this out of personal experience - how many times did I hear of an upcoming project, then see an amazing trailer, just to be disappointed as I walked out of the theater. I think I can safely say that we have all done this.
District 9 is not a Hollywood film, by the way.
oh, and everyone should go see Zombieland. Saw it last monday and it was hilarious, a real treat :)
You can take number 4 off that list. It's Emmerich. No chance of it being even slightly watchable.
I find it funny when people say the 80's were a great time for movies. I can tell you that it didn't seem like it at the time. I went to a lot of movies in the 80's because I was a teenager, and mostly it was crap. If I happened to catch a future classic in the theater it was a nice surprise.
We take our chances when we go. Mostly it's disappointing. I loved District 9, but it was an odd movie and I don't know if it has staying power - I think it does. Didn't see Inglorious (kind of sick of Tarantino right now). I will see Shutter Island, The Road and Lovely Bones. And I'll probably see the Foundation trilogy if it ever gets made.
I was starting to get excited about The Foundation trilogy until Emmerich's name showed up.
You are right about #1 AVATAR will shake the foundations of movie making. It already has as a matter of fact
As I was told before seeing the preview on "Avatar Day":
"Avatar will be the greatest thing ever witnessed by the human eyeball. Jesus Christ himself has planned the Second Coming to coincide with opening day just so he can catch a screening."
I'm looking forward to seeing Avatar & The Road. District 9 was gross, wierd yet strangely entertaining. I was rather disapointed with Inglorious Bastards as the movie focused less on the bastards and probably should of been retitled "Shoshanna's quest for revenge". I havn't seen Shutter Island or Moon but will probably catch them on dvd at some point. I'm not familiar with Foundation Trilogy but it sounds wierd and original so I'd check it out. No interest in Lovely Bones though the people involved in making it are quite talented.