Signed Up: November 27, 2006 Last Login: 201 days and 5 hours ago Name: Cappy Morgan Age: 39 Light Years Gender: Male Location: USA Profile Viewed: 2767 Times Fav Sci-Fi Movie: Blade Runner, Planet of the Apes, Star Wars (first trilogy), James Bond (do those qualify?) Fav Horror Movie: Evil Dead 2 Fav Genre TV Show: Thriller/Sci Fi/History/Dicovery/Junk Fav Book: The Sun Also Rises....hey, there just aint enough space. Fav Comic Book: Gosh, the last one I loved was the humorous 80's Justice League. So, you know I have no tastes. Video Game I Can Play All Day Long: I grew up with Atari. So, scratch that one off. Must Have Genre DVD in My Collection: Classics
"I've seen things..." - Dec 18, 2007 - 11:44am
Okay, let's just settle this part. The book and movie are two different things. In the book he was not a replicant. In the "original" film verision it was left very vauge. I'm not sure how Sean Young should chime in, because Harrison Ford is on record as saying they filmed it as Deckard not being a replicant. Personally, I prefer vauge, but because I believe the director saw an opportunity to cash in...several versions have now been updated that imply that he is a replicant. So, Ridley says he is, Ford said he wasn't...Ridley updates to win the argument. Now, I just want to know something...why would it make sense for Deckard to actually be a replicant? I do seem to recall quite well he didn't have any special functions, strength, etc. I personally liked the idea of a human falling in love with the replicant and learning the error of his ways. BTW, whatever happened to letting kids "think on their own"? I'd let my senior class develop their own therories on the subject. At least make them read the original source material too.
Colm Feore Appointed 'First Man' in 24 - Aug 24, 2007 - 04:46pm
No CTU? Great! I think that place was compromised about a dozen times. How many moles did they have working in that agency? Plus, it was growing stale.
Surprised that Surnow is a die hard. I mean, if you look at the show, the Presdients who have been portrayed in the better light have been Democrat. Convservative Democrats mind you. Gotta love their stance on terrorism. Too bad the most convservative in our government don't take the same stand.
Colm Feore Appointed 'First Man' in 24 - Aug 24, 2007 - 12:28pm
S@#*! I was hoping they would completely leave the President out of this one. Now we are going to get that crappy soap opera stuff from last season. Enough...how much more can happen in the White House? After the first Palmer and then the evil Gerorge, um, I mean the George clone (who seemed to turn into a bearded Al Gore after he lost the election look) they should have left well enough alone. I just wanted something different...without CTU and the White House. Well, let's keep our fingers crossed. Now we get the Hillary clone (wouldn't it be interesting if she was a Republican this time...I'm not buying that the producer is a Righty.) Sigh, Jack takes the back...seat.
BTW, there is NO story yet. They are just stunt casting. Hoping that will do the trick. They never had the story written before and the last we heard, their African idea was nixed. They obviously, and this was very, very evident last season, make it up as they go along.
Okay, let's just settle this part. The book and movie are two different things. In the book he was not a replicant. In the "original" film verision it was left very vauge. I'm not sure how Sean Young should chime in, because Harrison Ford is on record as saying they filmed it as Deckard not being a replicant. Personally, I prefer vauge, but because I believe the director saw an opportunity to cash in...several versions have now been updated that imply that he is a replicant. So, Ridley says he is, Ford said he wasn't...Ridley updates to win the argument. Now, I just want to know something...why would it make sense for Deckard to actually be a replicant? I do seem to recall quite well he didn't have any special functions, strength, etc. I personally liked the idea of a human falling in love with the replicant and learning the error of his ways. BTW, whatever happened to letting kids "think on their own"? I'd let my senior class develop their own therories on the subject. At least make them read the original source material too.