I think it's because these three films are loosely connected.

 I'm not whining, you c*nt, I'm just saying you can at least be respectful. But whatever.  It's not even that hard to do. You just want to be a contentious prick.  Some of us have been here for awhile and know whose taste parallel our own. So, what the f*ck would going to other sites prove?

 Antangonize? I dind't antangonize s**t. I think I made a very valid point. But since you brought it up - what about my reasoning can't get through your head?

 Only narrow minded people can't see why you should put a spoiler tag here in the comments. Especially when it was spelt out for you why somebody would come down and read the comments. Should I repeat myself?  Maybe somebody wants to get some other people's views that they trust more than the reviewer. Aye? Get it now? Is it that hard to digest? 

 Funny thing is people bitch about these ST have nothing Roddenberry in them but the most regarded ST film Wrath of Khan had no Roddenberry involvement at all. And the criticisms at that are the same thrown at both of JJ's STs.

 There is some outrage about Depp playing an Indian. Funny thing is that Depp is part Indian. Don't know how much but it's been said long before this movie was announced. Also don't know if Tonto was a full blooded Indian or not.

 Nope. I say Dracos Mallafoy from Harry Potter.

 Um, Kraks, I'm sure he didn't do all that with any intention of getting caught.

 I - myself - think that as a courtesy we should put spoilers. Because the way I see it is that other readers might not know what to think of the reviewers feelings - because they've disagreed with him before or all the time - and they want to see what everybody else's opinions are - people they might agree with on movies more than - let's say - Rob or whoever the reviewer is.

 Oh - I guess I didn't even read the article. Thought he was making it. If this is Snow White in space wonder if they'll use a hologram instead of a mirror.