WarCry's Recent Comments
Box Office: THUNDER Wins a Slow Labor Weekend - Aug 31, 2008 - 09:34pm
"Yeah well this film which was "Supposed to be this years Napoleon Dynamite," did not measure up to the hype as it tanked," Maybe because everyone who SAW Napoleon Dynamite was like me and didn't get what all the hype was about and they weren't going to fall for it again....

Rogue Moving Forward with STRANGERS Sequel - Aug 28, 2008 - 05:37pm
"The expectation is that Liv Tyler, along with several of the original villains, will return" Ok, the villains I can see, especially with the closing line, but Liv?? Ummm.....did anyone else WATCH the movie? Because I've not seen anyone comment on this line yet....

Alex Proyas Updates on Adapting Dracula's YEAR ZERO - Aug 28, 2008 - 05:24pm
It's been a while since I read it, but I don't believe Dracula ever turned into any animal in the book. So, saying that it's what he all about is....well...not... Besides, EVERYONE knows that Caine was the first vamipre. He sired 3, and those three created 13, the original Kindred of Caine......... ;)

Director Mathieu Kassovitz Upset About BABYLON A.D - Aug 25, 2008 - 08:32pm
Ok, not related at all to the news, but I've got to say, who's vetting the adds on the site? I mean, related products are Diesel Engine parts for certain VIN series? That's just about the funniest thing I've seen in a LONG time.....

LaBeouf Back in Action for TRANSFORMERS 2 - Aug 14, 2008 - 06:23am
"Does no one else care that his frakked up actions frak with other people besides him?" Did YOU happen to read the news reports? Yes, he was charged with SUSPICION of DUI, and I wouldn't try to excuse that, but the accident wasn't his fault. The other driver was charged with running the light, so if Shia had been stone-sober, a passenger, or even drunk and passed out in the back seat, the SAME THING could have happened. He didn't plow his car into a pole or something stupid, he was hit, and he was the victim in the accident. That's not fan-boy excuse-making, that's the fact of the case. So how 'bout ya check some facts before accusing someone of not caring or thinking about other folks, hey?

Stone Village Plans Werewolf LOBO Trilogy - Aug 12, 2008 - 09:24pm
What's up with Baker's Wolfman there? I looks like he ran into a parked car!! The beasties from Dog Soldiers were a much better starting point: http://www.esplatter.com/images/am/dogsoldiers6.jpg Even the Wolves in Underworld were well-done in my opinion (you can argue the merits of the film all you want). The problem with both of them is they're skinny, scrawny mutts with no fur. These things should be massive, not just tall, and should look like a husky in the middle of the Iditarod.... Just my call....

New Concept Car Shows Up in TRANSFORMERS 2 - Aug 11, 2008 - 07:50pm
Reincarnation of Jazz?

New Redband Footage for PUNISHER - Jul 27, 2008 - 02:08pm
I'm generally the first guy who says "wait for the release, don't jump to conclusions..." But... Every time something new comes out about this film, it brings me down another notch. Blood and brains don't equal good action. Take a look at TDK again (yeah, I did it...shoot me!). All the stuff that was bloody and/or gory was done, it was just done off-screen. The only reason to show it is for pure shock. Then again, I'm not a fan of the "great" Saw series either, so what do I know? With this new trailer, my brain is just screaming that this looks like a big-budget version of the 1989 Punisher. I actually LIKE that movie (in a bad, B-movie sorta way), but this one.... I'll reserve my judgment, but..... (BTW, while checking the date for the earlier film, I found a weird fact...Did anyone else know that Dolph Lundgren has a Master's Degree in Chemical Engineering? He ditched a scholarship to MIT to pursue acting...not sure that was the best option, but hey.....)

SDCC: Batman: The Brave and the Bold Panel - Jul 26, 2008 - 08:37am
I was actually surprised by the changes in "The Batman". When it started, it was very much a Saturday-morning, make-the-kids-want-toys series. The last season or two really moved it back to a more adult (not adult, mind you, but MORE adult) tone. And they got rid of the "BatWave" stuff. This series looks like fun. I love the dark, broody stuff, but I like the SuperFriends version, too. This looks likely to be somewhere in the middle. It's a Batman cartoon, so I'm pretty sure I'll enjoy whatever they do with it.... Oh, and since Hanso mentioned the suit, I've gotta say, I'd be THRILLED to see a Bats movie with the grey and blue. When in the comics (other than maybe Elseworlds stuff) did Batman where big, black body armor? This isn't a dig at Nolan's films (or Burton's, for that matter), because I know they're trying to do a real-life deal, but Spider-Man showed that you CAN do the comic costumes in the modern age without being super-cheesy.... I'm all for the Blue and Grey (not the Civil War....though Atlanta seems to be getting uppity again........)

Update: DARK KNIGHT Grabs Third Record - Jul 21, 2008 - 06:07am
I think with the spirit and tone of these films, Black Mask would be perfect as a villain. His story lends itself to this movie series - anger over his deceitful parents, hatred for Bruce Wayne. I don't really think we'll see any actual "comic book" villains like Clayface or Man-Bat. Even as great as TDK is, they changed the Joker so he wasn't a "comic book" villain. It's fine to do that, too, and (obviously) the result is great. I just don't see them bringing in something that so far off the charts like a Clayface. One thing I think that could be lifted successfully from earlier films (no, not Arnie as Freeze) is the Batman/Catwoman relationship. Aside from the silly origin of Catwoman in "Batman Returns" (please, can SOMEONE read "Year One"?), the fact that the hero and villain are antagonistic while the alter egos start to get closer would translate well to Nolan's work. All and all, TDK is pitch-perfect in delivery and by pretty much making it's budget back (worldwide) in the first weekend, it's a pretty safe bet there are higher powers than us discussing the same issues about #3....

Universal and Platt Planning WANTED 2 - Jul 15, 2008 - 06:39pm
Call me crazy, but why not consider doing something more like the Crow series? Same basic premise for each run, but different details, different players? The Crow, BTW, could have been one of the most successful franchises if they'd stuck with the stories from the comics and, I don't know, had a budget. Just a thought...

Something Viral Planned for DARK KNIGHT - Jul 07, 2008 - 05:58pm
For those who don't want to look it up, the two locales are: a park in NYC across Lafeyette St from the Jacob Javits Federal Buiding (NY Home of the FBI, I believe) and the other is a parking lot on the Chicago River in Chicago, next to a Potbelly's Sandwich Works on South Wacker Drive. I don't know what they're doing, but I'll be glued to my monitor tomorrow night...

RESIDENT EVIL 4 Is "Possible" for Sony - Jul 01, 2008 - 07:02pm
I didn't have any real complaints about the last RE film, but not a lot seemed to HAPPEN in it. I mean, there was action, but there wasn't a lot of story. I'd gladly watch another one, I'd just rather see more story goin' on.... ....though crap blowin' up all over the place is fun too....

Mark Millar Still Loves SUPERMAN - Jun 28, 2008 - 09:56am
"Now I'm confused about them not letting Millar, but they let Singer switch sides. Doesn't make sense to me." Well, Millar is actually a comic book writer, not just making Marvel movies. And they didn't let Singer switch sides. He actually asked if they'd hold X-3 for him so he could do SR, then come back and do X-3, and FOX opted to terminate their contract with him instead. Millar, it seems, wants to keep his 'day job' but work on a competing movie. This is why I like the days back when, before artists were "contracted" to one house or another. You could read a John Byrne run on X-Men, then catch his story in Superman. It was pretty much freelance stuff... I like Mark Millar. I'd love to see his take on Superman in movie form....

Burton Directing Depp in DARK SHADOWS - Jun 03, 2008 - 10:44pm
"WTF is up with these two. Can't they get along without each other. " When you have a winning team, why break it up? Edward Scissorhands, Sweeney Todd, Ed Wood, Sleepy Hollow, and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. Why would you NOT want them teamed up? Betcha Helena Bonham Carter will be in it, too....

HOBBIT Enters Pre-Production with Returning Cast - May 21, 2008 - 06:22am
Two things.... I'm REALLY curious where they're going with this, because Strider wasn't in the Hobbit, so I don't know where Viggo's going to fit in... and Where's Ian Holms' name? You can't tell The Hobbit without Bilbo, and you can't have Bilbo w/o Holms. Even the speculation part of the article didn't mention his name...

SPIDER-MAN 4 & 5 Filmed Together? - May 17, 2008 - 05:17am
I absolutely love Kirsten Dunst, but I was never sold on her as MJ....I can't really put my finger on the real reason, just don't think she was right. Maguire was great as Peter Parker, which is what really matters (much as anyone can be in the Batman suit, you've got to pull of the alter ego to get it right). Spidey 3 just tried to do much with too little time. I really don't know if that was Raimi or the studio saying "We want Venom, we want Sandman, and we need to wrap up the Harry storyline). Either way, the result was.....subpar. Not the worst movie ever, but not as strong as 1 & 2. Change can be good. Get some new blood in there to revitalize the franchise.

First Seven Minutes of RACER Online - May 08, 2008 - 08:35pm
Just got back from a (free!) preview screening. I wasn't sure if I wanted to see this or not.... ...GO WATCH THIS!!! It's just a rousing blast! It's not going to change the world, it's not going to change anyone's life, but it's just FUN!!! Isn't that what summer movies (most movies, actually) suppose to be? Lots of great tips o' the hat to the cartoon, including Speed's trademark gaspy sound... It's bright, flashy, popcorn fun... Just go see it, fer cryin' out loud!

And the 2008 MTV Movie Award Nominations are... - May 06, 2008 - 05:41pm
I watch the MTV awards, not because of the 'awards' factor, but because they do tend to have some pretty good spoofs and such, and occasionally some decent bands. And yes, I do believe that they take money for wins. Hence Transformers was sponsoring the "Best Movie You Haven't Seen Yet" category last year (what the hell kinda category is THAT, anyway...it's as bad as saying a movie sux before you see it). Then, shock of shocks, Transformers won the category... I watch for the occasional entertainment factor, not to see who wins anything...

Injuries on G.I JOE Set - Apr 27, 2008 - 05:14pm
August of '09 is the current scheduled release...

Injuries on G.I JOE Set - Apr 27, 2008 - 06:29am
Well, as long as the report of no serious injuries is true, then the most important thing here is in the 2nd picture.... The lettering on the SUV sure looks to me like it says M.A.R.S. Nice to see some of this stuff starting to come out, but it's crappy that's it's under this circumstance....where are all the set-spies?

Screen Gems Scores at the PROM - Apr 13, 2008 - 06:34pm
Prom Night was much more thriller than horror. There wasn't a "boogeyman" quality to it since you know from the beginning who the bad guy is. It was a good, no-thinking-required bit of entertainment that was fun... As for the gore and rating......blood doesn't always mean good, ya know....Look at one of the #1 rated horror films ever - Texas Chainsaw Massacre....nearly bloodless, but still scary as hell....

A Horror Western From John Woo? - Apr 02, 2008 - 09:52pm
"I'm trying to figure out this "great reason" why production will be pushed back six months. Could the producers being targeting a particular actor whose schedule will open up in August?" I think this is the exact reason, right here....someone has signed - or close to it - that won't be ready until August.

Three More Join Whedon's DOLLHOUSE - Mar 27, 2008 - 06:02am
Seeing as BSG has already filmed half of it's last season and starts production on the other half in a few weeks, these guys are just setting up their next jobs... Penikett's a fantastic actor, so seeing him working w/ Joss Whedon ought to be fun...

Tony Soprano Takes on PELHAM - Mar 24, 2008 - 08:16pm
Ok, I COMPLETELY misread the title at first glance and thought Gandolfini was going to be fighting a really bad cold... ...hopefully the marketing folks don't get a typo when they're making posters...

First Look at G.I Joe's SNAKE EYES - Mar 22, 2008 - 08:14am
Quick question... I was just reading the USA Today article on this (link below) and wanted to know what THIS like means.... "Joseph Gordon-Levitt (3rd Rock From the Sun, Brick) plays multiple roles, including the Cobra Commander." I knew he was playing the Commander...what else is he playing? Anyone? Anyone? The article: http://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/news/2008-03-20-gi-joe-preview_N.htm

First Look at G.I Joe's SNAKE EYES - Mar 22, 2008 - 08:09am
I like the uniform, though the neoprene has a bit too much sheen in my opinion. I'm sure they'll fight that back a bit with lighting. I really like the blend of the ninja look (with the visor instead of goggles) and the commando wear (the equipment harness). It really shows at a pretty quick glance who this guy is... The red on the Clan symbol and blade are enhanced in these pics, so I'm not worried about that. (don't believe me? Take a look at the pistol's safety in the first pic. It looks light a laser pointer....someone just enhanced the red) I know someone made a quasi-facetious reference to Timber (a grey wolf, BTW, not a dog), but keep in mind Timber was never "part of the team" except on the cartoons. This movie is trending closer to the comics (as the hiring of Larry Hama would show), so if we see Timber at all, I'd guess at the beginning or the end, if they show Snake Eyes either "coming out of retirement" or "taking a break for a while" at his cabin in the High Sierras. (yeah, I know this stuff way to much...sue me)

Emmerich's New Apocalyptic Pitch for 2012 - Feb 20, 2008 - 06:19pm
"I think the thing that irked me most about Day After Tomorrow was that there wasn't even an attempt to explain why the disasters were happening. I would've gone along with a bad attempt, but there wasn't even that." Actually, they did explain it....I'd imagine the 'science' is shaky, but here's what they gave... The atmospheric (and therefore, weather) systems are affected by a particular undersea current. This current is dependent on the salinity of the ocean. Due to global warming, the polar caps melt, adding to much fresh water, throwing off the salinity and causing the current to stop, thus destroying the balance of the weather systems... So, Global Warming was the cause of the big Freeze... Don't think too hard on it...you're head will explode...

Yates Could Return for DEATHLY HALLOWS - Feb 20, 2008 - 06:44am
Not Tim Burton. I love his work (just saw Sweeny Todd this weekend), but though his TONE is appropriate, his VISUALS tend to be somewhat flashy. Even in Toddy there are some bright colours that abound, from the splashes of blood to Signor Pirelli's costume. I have no doubt that he COULD do it, especially since it has some of his favorite actors in it (including Helena Bonham Carter), but I don't think Hogwart's should look like Willy Wonka's factory or Beetlejuice's....anything, really, in that movie...

Emmerich's New Apocalyptic Pitch for 2012 - Feb 20, 2008 - 06:36am
Whatever the film's premise, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't want to live in Emmerich's New York City. That guy has a real passion for destroying NYC. I've not seen 10,000BC, but I'm thinking the big city they show in the film is probably based on an island on the east coast of the North American continent, and the city will be turned to rubble by a herd of stampeding mammoths... Just a guess.... ;)

New Teaser Poster for Bond's SOLACE - Feb 07, 2008 - 08:42pm
------------- "Dominic Greene" and "Mr. White," huh? I have good feelings about the movie, but I'm starting to think they should have called it "Reservoir Bond." ------------- Or Bond: Clue

Update: Quaid, Vosloo & Tatum Confirmed For G.I JOE - Jan 31, 2008 - 08:09am
As of right now, this site hasn't posted it, but Latino Review is reporting that Larry Hama has been hired by Paramount as a creative consultant for this film. I was excited already because I love this franchise. With this announcement, they've just ensured that I'll be in my seat for the midnight showing....

Update: Quaid, Vosloo & Tatum Confirmed For G.I JOE - Jan 30, 2008 - 05:23pm
I would probably agree with the "age of the beholder" determining the 'reality' of the Joes. I'm about dead center in the age bracket, and I watched the cartoon before I knew there WAS a comic. When I FOUND the comic, though, I was at a good age, and that WAS the story to me. The cartoons were...well, cartoons. I watched, laughed, cheered, whatever, but when they were over, they were over and it was time for something else. As for the realism of the comics, I might point out that, on the 'good guys' side there actually weren't deaths until very late in the run. Aside for the occasional "supporting character" death - like General Flagg (and who names a Navy carrier after an Army general? That's just wrong) - the first major character's death came in 1991 (issue #109) during the Joe's own "desert war." Doc bought it first, but there were 6 others killed in that one issue, and it was a HUGE deal in that book because it hadn't happened before. Ok, I'll go back to my Joe-Geek corner...

Update: Quaid, Vosloo & Tatum Confirmed For G.I JOE - Jan 29, 2008 - 07:33pm
So far, the only issue I have is Marlon Wayans, but that's just because I mostly know him from his comedy work. Dennis Quaid wouldn't have been my first choice for Hawk (Tom Berenger, hands down), but I think he'll pull it off. Everyone else fits. I'm not worried. If this ends up as a 'pseudo-real-world' interpretation like TF was, it'll be fan-frakkin'-tastic. Either way, I'm sure I'll be there opening night...

Update: Quaid, Vosloo & Tatum Confirmed For G.I JOE - Jan 29, 2008 - 05:57am
"I guess the dude isn`t going to have all that hair and be able to do that camoflage thing he did in the cartoon" Ummm....Zartan wasn't ever really shown whether he has hair or not. What I think you're referring to is the dark brown hood he always wore. Later toys showed him as bald with a painted/tatooed head.. Vosloo seems a little big for the part, in my opinion, but I like him as an actor. I think Dennis Quaid makes an interesting choice. As always, my opinion is "we'll see" but I'll probably still be there opening night...

First Set Photo for WOLVERINE Online - Jan 22, 2008 - 05:36am
In the broadest strokes, Stuff Happens in Logan's life, then the gov't/military does experiments on him, including messing with his memory. So, yes, he will have things happen that he will not remember by the time of X-Men.

CLOVERFIELD Monster Attacks January Records - Jan 20, 2008 - 08:38pm
"So sit back, enjoy your 4.00 water and 3.25 medium popcorn, which pays for those ushers to clean the auditorum when your done..and oh yes, enjoy the show!" See, that works well for me, since I walked out and was halfway home before I realized I'd left half of my popcorn sitting in the bag in the seat beside me. So, I paid for it, THEN they had to pick it up too... ...sucks, though...I like stale movie popcorn.. ;)

CLOVERFIELD Monster Attacks January Records - Jan 20, 2008 - 04:30pm
"Honestly, I do not see the profit! With SOOOOO much Viral and ads for this film, it had to a lot more than this." I'm not sure how much you might think the viral marketing would cost. They have a total of 5 websites for this movie, and I can tell you from personal experience (I just had to re-register my domain and hosting) that the hosting fees can be pretty low. I know they likely spent more than me because of the bandwidth needs, but still... A budget reported at $25M (likely closer to $30M or $35M based on "studio math"), even if you double that for advertising and marketing, yeah, they're gonna be in the black on this one....easily and by far...

Five More Enlist in Kevin Smith's PORNO - Jan 16, 2008 - 05:38am
I believe Clerks 2 was a commitment to Jay Mewes. I seem to recall several years back that Smith told Mewes if he would commit to and complete a rehab program he would write another movie. Even besides that, it was a damn funny movie.

Cube Wants a 'Hardcore' A-TEAM Movie - Jan 11, 2008 - 05:22pm
Akinnuoye-Agbaje will be too busy in GI Joe to do this one....

Cube Wants a 'Hardcore' A-TEAM Movie - Jan 11, 2008 - 05:39am
It's amazing that, in a movie about fighting INTERNATIONAL terrorism (GI Joe), there's a hue and cry when there's even a HINT that it might not be an All-American team, but in a film about a 4-man American special forces team operating to help folks in the US, someone wants them to be European?

Cube Wants a 'Hardcore' A-TEAM Movie - Jan 10, 2008 - 06:28pm
I think Jim Carrey could pull off HM Murdock pretty well, but the problem is 2-fold. 1) It's a "team" movie and I'm not sure he'd be willing to sign up to be part of the ensemble and not the headliner and 2) I think even if he was willing, it would pull away from the other 3 (or 4, if you add Triple-M into the mix ;) Clooney's a big star, but he's proven he can play well with others (Ocean's films). I actually think Matthew McC would be decent as face. I think he could play the "playboy" as well as an ass-kicker as needed. I really don't have any problems with Cube as BA. Ving Rhames might be a little bit better, but he's getting a bit long in the tooth (he's 10 years older than Cube, and 14 years older than T was at the end of the series), and I think Cube is a pretty damn good actor, from Boyz N the Hood and Three Kings (also with Clooney) to showing his funny side with the Are We ** Yet? movies and Friday. HM Murdock, to me, is the hardest cast. You need to believe the insanity, but not see it as over-bearing. It's a tough one, and I'm not sure I envy the casting director on that one...

Update: WB Is Now Blu-Ray Exclusive, HD-DVD Responds - Jan 04, 2008 - 09:25pm
Yes, Sony has partners in the Blu-Ray association. Take a look at the timeline though... Sony begans a project using a new wavelength laser-diode. The first demonstration of this product was in Oct 2000. The format was referred to as BD-RE. April 2001, the first commercially-available product in this line was introduced in Japan. There was no set recording standard, so there were no discs to play on it, it was just a big, fancy, WAY overpriced DVD player. May 2002 - more than a year after Sony released the first device in this product-concept - the Blu-Ray Association was started. Yeah, there are partners, but never doubt for a moment that Blu-Ray is Sony's baby. In fact, ask Sony. They'll be the first to tell ya....

Update: WB Is Now Blu-Ray Exclusive, HD-DVD Responds - Jan 04, 2008 - 08:27pm
If anyone cares to research it a little bit, you'd know that Sony has shown a consistent track record of losing format wars, and for the same reason: they refuse to license their proprietary equipment specs to third-party vendors (disc and player makers). This keeps the costs high and the options minimal. Here's a sampling of some of their previous battles... Beta vs VHS - Beta has a higher quality, but VHS was cheaper to produce and had longer recording capabilities. DVD - Sony (with Philips) had a product called a "MultiMedia Compact Disc" that was battling with - you guessed it - Toshiba's SuperDensity discs. 1 change from the MMCD format that made discs somewhat more resilient to damage was forced onto the SD format. With this change, Sony surrendered to the SD format and, with the change they required as a condition of going with the SD, efficiency of the SD discs dropped, causing the storage to go from 5GB to 4.7. Way to go, Sony... With my DVD collection over 550 titles at this point, it's going to be a long, LONG time before I seriously look at changing formats, and by the time I'm ready, I'm pretty certain HD and Blu Ray will be things of the past....

Storm Shadow & Scarlett Cast for G.I JOE - Dec 19, 2007 - 06:21pm
The biggest issue with the Storm Shadow casting is that it could be seen as insulting. There are fewer ways to insult someone of Japanese origin than to call them Korean or Chinese, and visa versa. And I'm not just 'stereotyping,' I've now folks from all three ancestries and I can vouch for this. Now, from a FAN'S standpoint, I like the look of both of these guys. I was wary of the images of Ms. Nichols, but the link to LR has a pic of her with red hair, and it makes a world of difference. From a fan's POV, I'm pretty happy. I only worry about possible unwanted feedback on the casting.... Then again, controversy occasionally sells (just don't tell that to the Golden Compass people)...

Paramount Sets Angelina Jolie as Spy - Dec 05, 2007 - 08:07am
Seeing as how this is based on a real-life operative and mission, my guess would be it'll be less "James Bond" and more "Lord of War" (Nicolas Cage). Much more of a drama than a action/adventure, because that's how real-life intelligence ops are run.

The New K.I.T.T Revealed? - Dec 02, 2007 - 12:19pm
See, everything said there was actual critiques, there wasn't a 'whine' in there. There's actually only one of them that I disagree with: "3. Sleek, curvy, sporty looking (ex. Ferrari or prototype vehicle)" In this case I WILL reference the original insofar as the original, while a sharp, snazzy car, was something you could see anytime you went out of the house, even at the time it was on. Someone made a pseudo-sarcastic comment earlier that if this was something real, they'd probably be using a something like a Ford Taurus or a another 'generic' sedan to blend in. The sports car, though, adds a little flair without being exotic just for the sake of being exotic. Personally, I couldn't care less WHAT kind of car they use as long as they have decent stories and decent acting. I'm not sure I'm expecting a lot from this after NBC's miserable attempt with Bionic Woman (which I had high hopes for), but I'll judge it when I see it. Thanks for the non-hyper-reactive comments, jedi4sshield. I knew there was a rational voice out there...

The New K.I.T.T Revealed? - Dec 01, 2007 - 03:17pm
Why would you want a show set in 2008 with a 25+ year old car? The fact that the Mustang is consistently one of Fords best selling cars - not to mention one of the top sellers over all - means nothing? I don't care about honest criticism of shows, movies, etc. But this is just plain old fashioned bitching because 'it's not the way I remember it' or 'it's different, and it shows the creators don't care!' That's not - in any way - constructive, and it's well beyond criticism. If you want to do constructive criticism, one of the first things you have to do is have something to criticize. Unless someone's an insider bitchin' about their work, I don't think there's anyone here who's seen frame one of this show. You're jumping on something because it doesn't meet your ideals. That's not the same thing. I'm just tired of reading nothing but folks whining because no one at the studio asked for their opinion. That kinda thing happens...it's called 'life.'

The New K.I.T.T Revealed? - Dec 01, 2007 - 01:06am
Ya know, it's amazing. Folks are willing to jump on any damn thing in the world. If the car was a Pontiac, folks would bitch about 'no one drives those any more' and all the Ford and Doge nuts would be leading the 'boycott'. Now, they pick a Ford, so of COURSE it's all wrong. By the gods, if someone takes something we loved as 8 year olds and changes ONE LITTLE DETAIL (which is probably remembered incorrectly anyway), then they're 'destroying a classic'. Trust me, as much as I loved the show, Knight Rider was NEVER a classic. Oh, and for all the car buffs out there, someone might just want to point out there is NO SUCH THING as a Pontiac Trans-Am. It was a Pontiac Firebird with the Trans-Am package. If you're gonna bitch, ya might wanna make sure you at least know what you're bitching about.... I say, if you don't wanna watch it, shut up. If you want to but decide not to because of the car, shut up. It's a damn TV show!

ENCHANTED Jumps Ahead of Hitman - Nov 25, 2007 - 12:35am
Call me nostalgic, but I seem to remember the days when folks worried about what a movie was ABOUT rather than what it cost to make or what it made at the box office. The only folks who did (or should) care about this stuff are the accounts and the folks tryin' to decide to greenlight a sequel. Just because the information is publicly available doesn't mean the public should care...

THOR Delayed Until Strike Ends - Nov 20, 2007 - 07:53pm
Someone mentioned working in the UK to avoid the strike/union members. That's not gonna work, see, because MOST of the unions are international, not just US. There are workers that can be hired for some of the more manual work, but the big deals are still unionized.

WGA Update: Talks Resume on Nov 26 - Nov 18, 2007 - 07:51am
"I also believe that if you end up feeling like you are fighting a losing battle, then give in and accept that which you hopefully still have." See, this is the point of a strike. If they just gave in and accepted what they were offered, they would get a big steaming pile. The only threat the writers have is not working. If they give up this threat, or if they aren't willing to use it, they will never, EVER get changes made. It's been 20 years since the last strike, and the studios are using the SAME argument they did 20 years ago for trying to not pay them for new media. If you went in to work and your boss said 'we're not sure if your job is going to keep making us money. You just keep doing it, and we'll decide at a later date if you'll get paid, and how much, but just go ahead and keep coming to work in the meantime' are you saying you should just keep going in because if you say you won't come to work, it's a losing battle, and at least you have somewhere to go during the day, right? The writers know that if they don't work, things stop. They also know that it's affecting other professions, but if they don't put their foot down, the will never get anything. It's a crappy situation, but if they don't show they're willing to stand up for themselves, they'll just continue to be walked all over...like they have for the last 20 years....

WGA Update: Talks Resume on Nov 26 - Nov 17, 2007 - 10:24am
"And that's all the credit I'll give the self-important overrated lot of them." Well, glad to see you aren't taking side.....

WGA Update: Talks Resume on Nov 26 - Nov 17, 2007 - 07:25am
"the writers do seem to have everyone by the short curlys" I think the point here is that now everyone REALIZES that the writers are just extra baggage on a TV or movie, and that, yeah, they really do deserve to get a bigger piece of the pie. "no one likes to be threatened or bullyed, and by striking, that is what they are doing to the studios" I beg to differ. In this case, the writers are standing up to the bully and saying 'You're not taking my milk money any more.' I've watched enough 80s sitcoms to know that the only way to stop a bully is to stand up to them....

Possible STAR TREK Plot and TOS Writer Responds - Nov 13, 2007 - 12:13am
You guys comin' down on Ellison need to tighten your grip. The man was smart enough to get a legal, binding contract on crap he was making, and so he expects that contract to be honored. Which one of you is going to stand there and tell me you're going to give part or all of your paycheck back to your boss because it's not that important, and I got paid two weeks ago anyway. You think Ellison should let them slide on the legal, binding commitments? I'm gonna have to call BS on that, because if Paramount didn't want him to have those rights, they wouldn't have signed the contract. Here's another example: Fox was not smart enough to get the rights to the SW franchise. If they tried to release original material on their own, they'd get hammered. As an example of that business decision, the guy who signed the deal that let Lucas control his own property was quickly fired after the release of the first film. You can complain all you want, but if something YOU worked to create was lining someone else's pockets, I guarantee you're not gonna be "the good guy" and go, 'bah, I got paid, you keep the rest.' You'd be right out there on the line with them... Don't be bitter because you AREN'T selling your stories.....it makes you look bitter and petty....

Fans Pick BLACK ADAM for Johnson - Nov 03, 2007 - 04:47pm
"Now this is how a comic book movie should be made. Fans were asked to participate and their input is acknowledged and put into consideration." Just out of curiosity, are you out of your mind? The fans should have NO input in the creation of these movies unless you want to count the actors, producers, director, etc as fans. Even Johnson's "poll" is for HIS decision on which role he should take, not a 'casting call' from the director. My proof for this attitude? If it was up to the fans, Hugh Jackman would NEVER have played Wolverine. Too tall (which I acknowledge, but 5'3" is pretty short), and the fear of an Australian playing him still resonate to this day when folks hear they're filming in New Zealand & Oz. That Army of Darkness guy making Spider-Man? No way, never happen, and if it does it'll suck. How dare they take the X-Men out of their tradition bright uniiforms! After Schumacher, they should never make another Batman movie. They'll never be able to make up for that. Fans are a twitchy, nervous, selfish bunch that feel no matter what decision is made, they could have made it better. Look at the comments on this article alone and you'll see at least 2, and more like 4 or 5, completely different views on the characters. No, unless they're putting up $75 million of their own money, the only input fans should have is with their money at the box office. Anything else is just hot air....

SAW IV Cuts Out the Competition - Oct 28, 2007 - 07:12pm
I've not seen any of the Saw movies because I'm not into the gore stuff (same thing for Hostel), so I can't speak about the content, but it seems like they've found their market. Good for them. They haven't gone to a studio (it appears) and said "We've got a huge deal here, so now we want a $200 million budget for the next one." All the arguments about whether it "makes a point" or whatever is just...I don't know, it's a weird social deal that no one goes to watch movies just for FUN anymore. Everyone wants to be a critic. If these movies have 0.0 'social commentary' but they let folks who enjoy it have fun for two hours, what more do you need? Not these films, as I said, but I'm a fan of a LOT of dumb movies that have no purpose other than entertainment. I challenge ANYONE to find the social issues being dealt with by "They Live" but it's still a movie that makes me laugh and cheer every time. I guess my point is this: CHEERS! to the folks makin' the Saw movies for finding something that people want to see and delivering without TRYING to be the 'next big thing.'

GI JOE Begins Casting For Feb Start - Oct 25, 2007 - 11:11pm
As long as they don't end up doing what it appears they're doing with JLA: no Teeny-bopper-lookin' stars. Hit a military base, take a look at what the 'lifers' look like. Most of the Joes should be late-20s at the youngest, as most should be 'seasoned' troops who've been there and done that and are now being plucked to be the "best of the best of the best," to steal from Will Smith...

New Sci-Fi Series REVOLUTION Greenlit - Oct 20, 2007 - 10:40am
This show sounds interesting and I'd watch it, but there's a whole nother part of this story that doesn't seem to have been touched on... The WGA authorized a strike, the SAG is planning to strike....I'm surprised any network is willing to make a full-season pick-up right now, let alone greenlighting an entire new project...

Urban Confirmed as Bones for STAR TREK - Oct 18, 2007 - 06:28am
------in the future we are smarter and rather than using violence to solve every problem, our species had evolved to meet problems with intelligence and understanding.----- Are you sure you saw the original series? Because this might have been the INTENT of the show, but there was an awful lot of action in it, including guns, knives, and straight fisticuffs.

HELLRAISER Project Not a Remake - Oct 14, 2007 - 07:58am
People are so afraid of the word "remake," and I guess I can understand why, but call a spade a spade and move on. A remake, to me, means it's the same over-all story, but I EXPECT it's not going to be a shot-for-shot remake (like Psycho a few years back...and that was NOT a good idea). I'm sure the writer would rather be seen doing something 'original,' but if that's not what you're getting paid for, at least they're getting paid. Unfortunately, because of the internet, if you use the word remake you get ripped apart. It's just a stupid word game, and that's all...

Hood Answers 'Why' For WOLVERINE - Sep 29, 2007 - 08:31pm
They need to be very, very careful here not to OVER think Wolverine. Yeah, he's a deep character, lots of history and a messed up squash on his shoulders, but the reason folks love him is because he's the best at what he does..."and what he does ain't pretty." This sounds, to me, like they're looking at Wolvie as the "Oh, whoa is me, my life is horrid, and I must fight the good fight for no other purpose than to redeem my worthless existence." Granted, there might be SOME of that in Logan, but that's not ALL there is...or even then most important part...

Tyrese Gibson For GREEN LANTERN in JLA? - Sep 28, 2007 - 09:46pm
"the whole "Make it rain," crap form transformers" I know this is going to be buried in the comments, but I've gotta say this... The line is "Bring the Rain" and it's not bad writing, acting, whatever. Two things: You can't judge acting by what he SAYS. Writers write, actors read what the writers write. Second, this is real, honest-to-God military slang. It's denotes a massive storm of hot lead and explosives, also called "steel rain" in the bombing campaigns of WWII. Just thought I'd point out what is one of the BEST lines of dialouge in Transformers....at least for an old soldier like me...

Tyrese Gibson For GREEN LANTERN in JLA? - Sep 28, 2007 - 07:02am
"Hal Jordan, the white and original Green Lantern" Metalwater, the ORIGINAL Green Lantern was actually Alan Scott. The better known, arguably, is Hal Jordan, but with the latest JL and JLU cartoons, that distinction might be harder to argue now. I've got no problem with John Stewart, but I thought this was intended to be more of an "original" JLA type of set up, meaning probably Hal Jordan. I don't mind if they use the Stewart character instead, but for some reason, I'd been thinking of Jordan, so when I saw Tyrese Gibson's name, it took me a minute to realize what they were talking about. My initial reaction was 'he can't play Hal Jordan!" That's what I get for thinking.....

HEROES Book Series Debuts Dec 26 - Sep 27, 2007 - 07:29pm
I love tie-in stuff, but I'd rather it was original material instead of just 'fill in the gaps' to stuff we already know. I'd be ecstatic if they did a series with side-characters or never (or at least not-yet) seen characters. They've done it a little bit with the comics (all the Wireless stories), so now it's time to move it to the more prose-based works....

More Mutants in WOLVERINE? - Sep 11, 2007 - 07:57am
It could easily be Gambit...just because he's from Louisiana doesn't me he can ONLY be in Louisiana until he joins the X-Men. Folks do travel... For that matter, is anyone 100% certain that Logan won't end up in the Big Easy at some point?

Rated R JOHN RAMBO Trailer #2 - Sep 08, 2007 - 11:37pm
This movie is much better looking than 2 or 3. Regardless of the fact that the character died, this is much closer to the stuff seen in the "First Blood" novel. I was, to be honest, surprised by the sheer brutality and graphicness of the trailer(s). I know what they're shooting for, but it's gonna limit their audience. Doesn't matter. The target audience will be there, even though the critics are likely to scream bloody murder.... ...of course, in this case, they'll be right....

Tyler Mane Looking For THOR - Aug 29, 2007 - 09:58pm
If Vincent D'Onofrio can do it, why not Tyler Mane? (anyone?) I know he didn't have much to say in X-Men, and I can't see him stretching any vocal talents in Halloween, but I think he's got a great look for it. I think Vladimir Kulich would be a decent choice, too. I don't think Thor has to look young...he's a God, for cryin' out loud...I think there could be a few things worse than having him show a few of the eons he been alive...

Warner Bros Options Darker WIZARD OF OZ Revision - Aug 22, 2007 - 06:50am
Alice is actually based on Alice in Wonderland (or, more correctly, Alice Through the Looking Glass). I've been thinking for a long time that this film needs to be redone, and to hell with 'classics.' The Stardust hotel in Vegas was a classic, but it still got blown to hell. Besides, this sounds more like Burton's "Chocolate Factory," based more on the books than making it 'light-hearted' fare. Now, if only they'd REALLY go dark and make McFarlane's 'Twisted Land of Oz.' Pretty sure that'd be direct to video and you'd have to go in the little back room to rent it...

Katie Holmes as WONDER WOMAN? - Aug 19, 2007 - 09:56pm
What is with everyone saying Carpenter and Lawless are too old? Have you folks ever read a WW comic? I'll admit, I'm not an avid follower, but I seem to recall she's always come across as late twenties at the youngest, probably closer to mid-30s. Much more of a 'grown-up' that a younger girl just learning the way the world works. Lynda Carter played WW when she was between 25 and 30 or so, and everyone seems to hold her up as the ideal. Charisma Carpenter is older than that, but hell, she pulled off a teenager on Buffy pretty well when she was almost 30 in the first few seasons. Real age has little to do with on-screen age. Anyone who watches movies knows that.

Disney Announces BLU-RAY Partnership - Aug 19, 2007 - 12:37pm
Let me clarify what I was saying about Sony: they have absolutely no problems in their development practices. Their designs for CDs were superior. Beta is actually a better format, quality-wise, than VHS. Blu-Ray has a lot of benefits over HD-DVD. The problem for Sony is their business/marketing practices. Even now their digging in their heels and don't want to license Blu-Ray for anyone to make a dual-format machine. There are a few out there, but it's not as prevalent as it could be. Sony wants to be the keeper of the keys on Blu-Ray, discs and machines. While this makes since in some regards, look at what happens: 4 companies make Blu-Ray machines and prices stay pretty consistent. HD-DVD gets licensed to more manufactures, you get 10, 15 companies making machines, dropping prices to compete with each other. Which one do you think ends up in more living rooms? The quality of Blu-Ray is less of a factor in this battle, as with all other format fights. The real deciding factor is $$. Sure, Blu-Ray might be the best format in the world, and those who have the money will want it because they want the best. But folks like me who have to worry more about the costs than the quality (and yes, I do try to get the best bang for my buck), a $200 HD player is going to win out over a $400 Blu-Ray, or even a $400 dual-format machine... The mid- to low-level consumers are the folks Sony (marketing, remember, not development) tend to forget about when the put the tight leash on their products. As an additional note about the power of the adult industry, MNLS above mentioned the internet and streaming video. Ask any internet industry insider and, if they're being honest with you, they will tell you that the money involved in porn is what drove development of high-speed internet connections and better streaming protocols. It might not be something that's talked about in public, but starting in the late 70s, the adult industry has driven pretty much every aspect of the home entertainment industry. Here, again, Sony is likely to hurt themselves, because they said they don't want to even license the Blu-Ray manufacturing process to the companies that press adult-oriented discs. Don't believe me, here's what FOX news says on the subject.... http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,245638,00.html

Disney Announces BLU-RAY Partnership - Aug 18, 2007 - 09:44pm
Right now, Sony has said they don't want to allow Blu-Ray to be used by the 'adult entertainment' industry. While this might sound like a joke, it's not. The porn industry almost single-handedly killed Beta for the same reason. Sony has lost every format war they've started because they're too restrictive and don't want to license stuff to other manufacturers. This killed them when there was a decision on the format to use for music CDs (anyone know there WAS a format war there?). Sony claims a win because they 'forced' some concessions from the other side, but they were minor changes to a format in the works. Sony was the parent of Beta, and we know how that worked. The format wars aren't over, and I agree with earlier statements that Disney (or any studio) is stupid enough to release on only one format. Hell, several studios still do VHS along with DVD, because there are still folks who have moved along to the late 90s yet....

Katie Holmes as WONDER WOMAN? - Aug 18, 2007 - 09:33pm
Lazerman read my mind. Lucy Lawless is the absolute best choice for this role. If anyone only knows her from Xena, check out some of her other work: Battlestar Galactica, Boogeyman (though only a small role), even Spider-Man! Not to mention the fact that WB has her ALREADY PLAYING WONDER WOMAN in the JLA animated next year. Come on, Lucy Lawless, Brandon Routh, and Christian Bale as your three leads in a JLA film? Second choice - distant, but still second - is Charisma. I disagree with saying she doesn't have the chops to do it. I think someone just has to get past that mentality and give her something to prove herself. But not Katie. I like the girl, I actually enjoyed her work in Disturbing Behavior (with future Cyclops James Marsden, for you comic buffs) and Phone Booth, but while I think, acting-wise, she could pull it off, I think she just has a bit of a 'wide-eye naitivity(sp?) about her that doesn't work for this role... Just my 1.5 cents (after taxes)....

DOCTOR STRANGE on Dvd & Blu-Ray Tuesday - Aug 12, 2007 - 10:58am
All four of the recent Marvel titles (2 Avengers, Iron Man, and Doc Strange) are PG-13, and I know that's the target rating for the Death of Superman. The real question isn't "adult or kid" on these, because that same question can be applied to the source material. Good storytelling is for those who appreciate good storytelling, and the bias against certain media (comics, animated, etc) is just another way that shows some people just 'don't get it.' If you're a fan of these comics, as I said in an earlier post, these movies are intended for you. They're more targeted to that fanbase than the wide-release theatrical runs which have to make the stories a little more 'mainstream' to get their money back.

DOCTOR STRANGE on Dvd & Blu-Ray Tuesday - Aug 11, 2007 - 09:45am
Here's my take on these animated releases: The theatrical releases, while fantastic, are created for a wider audience. Nothing wrong with that at all. These animated deals, though - Doc Strange, Ultimates, Death of Superman - are created for the fans of those books. They tend to be closer to the comics in both content and style. As my compatriots said, I can't wait!

Gibson, Allen Join DEATH RACE Remake - Jul 30, 2007 - 06:22pm
I've enjoyed most of Anderson's work, because, as was mentioned, they're just a lot of fun...as action-popcorn flicks should be. One think I would, say, though, is that Soldier let me down a bit. It got off to a really good start, and had the big climax, but it slowed down a bit too much in between for my tastes. As for this film....it's about time someone decided to remake this...Judging by the RE series, we should get some nice splats iwith those point totals...

New Look Of FLASH Characters - Jul 21, 2007 - 10:59am
"I said it once, I'll say it again; this is going to suck on so many levels." Ya know, this is the same thing I heard back in 2002-3 about Battlestar Galactica when it was announced. There are still folks out there who think that, but I believe a majority consensus is that it was pulled off. I'm a fan of Sci-Fi, even cheesy sci-fi (including the 1999 Wing Commander movie), so I'll wait and see how the characters develop in this, not base my response on a few publicity photos. Oh, and much like BSG, if you want a shot-by-shot remake of the original, just go get the original series and leave folks alone who want to do something a little different with the series...

BOND 23,SPIDER-MAN 4 & More Set - Jul 15, 2007 - 08:58am
Ya know, it really ISN'T too early to be thinking of '09 or '10. Films take time to write, then cast, then shoot, and, in the case of most of these big summer flick, they can take quite a while to do the FX. If you have a film that's going to take 18 months from concept to in-the-can, you have to start planning ahead. Look at that schedule for next summer...If I was a studio, I'd not want to try and shoehorn anything else in there, either. Since you can't go backwards on the calendar, then onward you go...

HALLOWEEN Soundtrack Revealed - Jul 09, 2007 - 07:16pm
Other than a song on a soundtrack, what does Zombie have to do with the Crow? Anyway, I'm psyched about this film, and the soundtrack just adds that much more. I'm actually surprised there's not Black Sabbath. It's the right time-frame, and Zombie is good pals with the Oz-man.

AVP 2 Gets a New Name - Jul 01, 2007 - 10:04am
Here's the problem I have with them making the 'tip of the hat' to the original Alien and its sequel. The difference was, in Alien, there was ONE alien. In Aliens, they were battling a bunch. Now, in AvP, there were already a bunch (3? I think that's right) of aliens. So, in the 'tribute to the original series' frame of mind, it makes no sense... Oh, well...I still thought the first movie was fun...not great, certainly not perfect, but fun...

It's SOUTH OF THE BORDER for Barrymore - Jun 12, 2007 - 07:49am
Disney is going to get hammered with words like "racist" and "stereotype" over this movie before the first image is ever released... Which is a damn shame, because it sounds pretty amusing, and has a good voice cast.

NBC Announces HEROES: ORIGINS - May 14, 2007 - 10:50pm
No, I think you were right the first time. The "Origins" will run starting in a few weeks, run for 6 weeks over the summer, then have the vote. This gives the writers and such time to work the new character in when filming really gets ramped up for the new season...

Stormtrooper Helmet Replica - EP IV - May 11, 2007 - 10:35pm
Ummm...yeah, it IS all about the money. LFL is a business, not a charity. If they didn't make money, there wouldn't be anything for 'fans' to bitch about being done "only for the money."

Smoking to Affect Movie Ratings - May 11, 2007 - 08:05am
Just out of curiosity, am I the only one who remembers that movie ratings are not SUPPOSED to be 'laws' or restrictions? They are SUGGESTIONS for parents to make determinations. If movie theatres treat them as gospel, then the issue is with them, not the MPAA. Don't get me wrong, I think this is an incredibly dumb decision, but the MPAA doesn't say who can get in to films, it gives info for parents and other moviegoers to make their own decisions.

Battlestar Galactica to upset fans? - Jan 20, 2007 - 10:38am
To be fair to Karl, if he DIDN'T report the news, you all would have been fast to kill him. The 'KJ's take' is something on all his stories. At least he didn't make something up to blow sunshine at us.... --As for who's going, this has been asked at TVGuide.Com for a few weeks, and there resident spoiler-guru still insists it is NOT Starbuck....

"Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End" Concept Art - Jan 18, 2007 - 05:30pm
I seem to recall Ms. Knightly talking about the same subject when the first PotC movie came out. She said they airbrushed some shadows to make it look like deeper cleavage. I believe her comments about it when she saw the final product was along the lines of "where did THOSE come from?"

"Matrix" and "Harry Potter" to hit HD DVD - Jan 09, 2007 - 11:08pm
I'm still going with what I said when HD and BluRay were announced: Wait and see. I'm not going to spend a fortune on hardware and discs only to have them be on the "losing side." This might put me behind in having the newest and brightest, but I'm willing to bet it will save me some $$. All that said, I'm rooting for HD, and this is a good sign. I'm just tired of Sony trying to shove their proprietary gear/formats on everyone (Beta, anyone?)

STORM Hits Dimension - Dec 12, 2006 - 09:05pm
"The story centers on a husband and wife who go on a fishing trip that turns very wrong" --- See, I was thinking this was the early adventures of Thurston and Lovey Howell.....

"He-Man" no more? - Nov 30, 2006 - 06:09am
It's a flaw in the US. People see "animated film" and they think "Bambi" and "Little Mermaid." They just don't understand things like "Akira" and "Princess Mononoke" that are intended for adults. I will give Disney a SLIGHT tip of the cap for trying to bring some of these to the US, but the Miyazaki films still feel targeted to kids. All that said, I don't mind a GOOD translation from cartoon to Live action. I think Transformers SHOULD be ok, but I wouldn't mind seeing a GOOD He-Man in either format.....but how 'bout we get a good GI Joe film first!

Hiro's dad is ... Hiro's dad on "Heroes" - Nov 22, 2006 - 07:21am
Karl (may I call you Karl?), it's not a biggie. I just read that and thought I missed something else. ------ Dawntreader, have you ever seen anything the Mr. Takei has made other than Star Trek? Trek was not know as the Shakespeare of television, ya know? Try "The Green Berets" from '68. Or, and here's a novel idea, watch these episodes and judge them on THEIR OWN MERITS....You said you were going to do this, but it seems obvious (to this reader, anyway) that you've made up your mind. If you EXPECT something to be bad, guess what.....

Hiro's dad is ... Hiro's dad on "Heroes" - Nov 21, 2006 - 06:53am
Ummm...can someone cite a source for THIS quote: "Masi Oka's real life father" Because this is the first I've heard of Mr. Takei being Mr. Oka's father outside of the set of Heroes....