Movie Review

Send to a Friend



To: (email)


To: (name)


From: (name)


Message:



CLICK

By: Rachel Reitsleff
Review Date: Friday, June 23, 2006

There are some very funny notions in CLICK, as well as some surprisingly dramatic ones. On occasion, this comedy/drama/fantasy about a man who receives a remote control with special powers works very well. The problem with the movie is not entirely unlike our hero's problem with his life it can't spend enough time actually doing one thing long enough for it to work.

Michael Newman (Adam Sandler) is both a family man and an architect who's having more than a little trouble making time for both his home life and his job. A more minor issue he's also befuddled by the household array of remote controls, so he lets himself be talked into getting a universal remote. Michael winds up in the "Beyond" section of Bed, Bath and Beyond, where he encounters helpful but enigmatic inventor Morty (Christopher Walken), who bestows upon Michael a device that controls real life the way a regular remote controls a DVD player. Michael finds he can pause moments, play back memories and fast-forward through the parts he doesn't want to experience. The trouble is, the universal remote winds up a little too attuned to Michael's personal patterns and takes over his existence in ways he neither anticipated nor really wants.

The screenplay by Steve Koren & Mark O'Keefe has great ideas (the business about what really goes on in "Beyond" is a pun that works on a number of levels). In essence, this is a very modern version of one of those folktales about a schmoe who doesn't know when he's well off, gets some kind of magic gift and has to go through the ringer just to return to where he was. Director Frank Coraci gets unexpected poignancy out of a number of scenes, including some with Henry Winkler as Michael's twinkly old father and a few where wry comedy and regret are on about equal footing.

Why, then, doesn't CLICK work better as a whole? For one thing, the tone whiplashes between broad farce and straight drama, a combination that can be brilliant if handled right but here feels largely unbalanced. Then there's the whole family/work conundrum, which is presented with neither much originality nor any sense that Michael might actually care to some extent about his profession (architects tend to have a little more passion for their creations than, say, office temps). However, the biggest problem is that for every joke that at least raises a smile, there are a number of others that merely lift an eyebrow or fall flat entirely. We wind up not liking Michael as much as we need to in order to root for him to get back on track, and even though there are a couple of dramatic bits with real punch, much of the movie feels like it's working too hard for both laughter and tears without fully thinking things through it's as if the filmmakers went for the first things that came to mind once they had the premise, without feeling the impulse to make sure all the pieces flowed together.


The result is that CLICK has some good moments that are worth watching, but a lot of the material feels recycled and tweaked to fit the surroundings here there are times when a lot of viewers may wish for Michael's magical remote to jump ahead within the film.


More Content By Rachel Reitsleff
88 Minutes
(Friday, April 18, 2008)
ALIENS VS. PREDATOR: REQUIEM
(Wednesday, December 26, 2007)
HITMAN
(Saturday, November 24, 2007)
SLEUTH
(Friday, October 12, 2007)
THE SEEKER: THE DARK IS RISING
(Sunday, October 7, 2007)
HATCHET
(Friday, September 7, 2007)
RUSH HOUR 3
(Friday, August 10, 2007)
STARDUST
(Friday, August 10, 2007)
THE BOURNE ULTIMATUM
(Friday, August 3, 2007)
SUNSHINE
(Friday, July 20, 2007)
Fandango Logo
Comments/Responses
1
• Jun 23, 2006, 12:19pm •
Please to note:
Movie was NOT given a "B" rating. For all those who constantly complain about Cinescape's reviewers.

• Jun 23, 2006, 12:49pm •
Yeah, but every one of their reviews falls between C+ and A-. The bulk of them just happen to be in the B range for obvious reasons.

• Jun 23, 2006, 02:55pm •
I'm just glad I didn't see the letter B again and this review actually seemed to fit the rating it got. A movie that has a good premise but that doesn't quite work so well sounds like a C+ to me. However, I think they gave this the same grade that they gave "Abomidable"...so is this just as good as that? I don't know. I don't want to be negative. Once you go down that road, nothing will ever be good enough. So yeah, review fits the grade I think.
I don't know that I'm going to see this one. I'll probably wait for the video release. I look to Sandler for my mindless wacky "Shampoo is better! NO CONDITIONER IS BETTER!" kind of humor. I (saddly) look to Steve Martin for my "minimally funny in the begining and tug at the heart strings at the end" big budget family comedies. The more main stream sandler gets, the more safe and bland his movies seem to get. BUt this will no doubt be #1 at the box office this weekend, so my presence will not be required.

mckracken • Jun 23, 2006, 03:12pm •
didnt they already MAKE this movie back in 1992 starring the late John Ritter called STAY TUNED?
LOL!!
(well ok.. not)

mckracken • Jun 23, 2006, 03:15pm •
plus I hate Adam Sandler flicks about as much as I hate Rob Schneider movies.
but David Spade RULES!

• Jun 23, 2006, 03:30pm •
I'm going to have a difficult time resisting this movie because it has not only Christopher Walken, but the Hoff as well. I must stay strong though.

• Jun 23, 2006, 06:57pm •
Adam Sandler is a one trick pony--the braying angry overbearing smart-ass jewish schtick was funny on SNL but as he gets older it's kinda pathetic...and guys think that THAT'S sexy to women to emulate...?


coldhardtruth • Jun 23, 2006, 08:18pm •
Is C+ the new B?

Despite Kate Beckinsale, I will not watch this movie. Ever. It looks unappealing, uninspired, and doesn't look funny in the least.

coldhardtruth • Jun 23, 2006, 08:24pm •
I wish Adam Sandler would quit making movies.

1
Login to post a comment!