ALIENS VS. PREDATOR: REQUIEM - Mania.com



Movie Review

Mania Grade: C+

Maniac Grade: C

112 Comments | Add

 

Rate & Share:

 

Related Links:

 

Info:

  • Reviewed Format: Theatrical Release
  • Rated: R
  • Stars: Steven Pasquale, Reiko Aylesworth, John Ortiz, Johnny Lewis
  • Writer: Shane Salerno, based on characters created by Dan O'Bannon & Ronald Shusett and Jim Thomas and John Thomas
  • Directors: Colin Strause & Greg Strause
  • Distributor: Twentieth Century Fox

ALIENS VS. PREDATOR: REQUIEM

A bunch of aliens vs. one Predator vs. a bunch of Colorado townsfolk...

By Rachel Reitsleff     December 26, 2007


Victoria Bidewell and the PredAlien in ALIENS VS. PREDATOR: REQUIEM (2007).
© Twentieth Century Fox
After Aliens in all three gestation forms run amok on a Predator ship (presumably the same one from the end of Alien Vs. Predator), the whole caboodle crashes to Earth outside a small town in Colorado. A lone Predator is sent to deal with the infestation. Meanwhile, meet the townies, who include a just-released convict coming home (Steven Pasquale), the convict’s teenaged brother (Johnny Lewis), the high-school jerks tormenting said brother, a combat veteran (Reiko Aylesworth) returning to her husband and little daughter and a diligent sheriff (John Ortiz) hard-pressed to deal with the growing carnage in the area.
 
There are glimmers of a really exciting movie within Aliens Vs. Predator: Requiem. When the title creatures face off against each other in those moments where we can see what’s happening, or when we see Aliens swarming up the sides of a power plant and a hospital, it’s cool.
 
Unfortunately, whether due to understandable but not-well-executed aesthetic loyalty to the visual darkness of the original Alien and Aliens or shortcomings in the final results that had the filmmakers not wanting to give us too close a look, it’s often very hard to see what’s going on when the Predator takes on the Aliens, especially in confrontations between the weapons-toting big bad E.T. and the very big Alien that was gestated within a Predator (this isn’t a spoiler, as we’re shown this has happened in the first frame of the film). We can just enough to recognize that the Alien-Predator has Predator-type dreadlocks and enough time to think, hey, the dreads are part of the armor, not the Predator itself. What’s the deal here – is the armor biological or did somebody not think this through? The Amalgamated Dynamics Inc. creature effects team, headed up by Alec Gillis and Tom Woodruff Jr. (it’s Woodruff in the Alien suit), does terrific work here and in the past, so this isn’t a slam at the creature’s appearance, just the logic of this detail.
 
This is not the only plot question we’ve got. For starters, why, if the Predators insist on hauling Aliens around the galaxy, even with the catastrophic incidents we’ve seen in this film and its predecessor, don’t they send in more than one Predator to cap the latest Earth infestation. Unless of course they don’t care, in which case, why are they bothering at all? Why give our hero an ex-con background if it’s never going to play into the story? Why have a subplot about high school bullying, depicted so perfunctorily that it would be annoying even in a routine slasher movie, with actors who all look too old for the grade?
 
There are also inconsistencies with the Aliens’ acidic blood, which can sometimes take a man’s arm off and sometimes squirt all over someone’s face with no evident effect.
 
Even these issues wouldn’t matter so much, except that Aliens Vs. Predator: Requiem is never actually scary, unless one is frightened by gore. The blood and guts are plentiful and impressive, but it’s hard to muster feeling for most of the characters and nothing ever jumps out in a way that startles.
 
It is simple monster movie fun to see Aliens and a Predator grapping with each other in the somewhat incongruous environs of a U.S. small town – indeed, the incongruity is perhaps the most entertaining part. It’s just a shame that what’s built up around this core doesn’t work better.

COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

Showing items 1 - 10 of 112
1 2 3 4 >  >>  
joeybaloney 12/26/2007 10:22:22 AM
Hmmmmm. Crap. Go figure.
fallensbane@yahoo.com_home 12/26/2007 10:45:44 AM
I enjoyed the movie but I agree on some of these points here. The movie was to dark. Trying to recapture the feeling of the original alien movie is just not going to work here. Not with this type of film. If this was just an alien movie dark would have been great and helped set the mood. But I think it did more harm than good to the film. I don't expect daylight but I would like to see whats going on. Not to mention there are several annoying cuts from kills in the film as well. We also really didn't need 20-30 minutes of setup for characters in the film that became bait and fodder anyways. Especially when most of these subplots lead nowhere. Hopefully they have a fair amount of stuff to add to a dvd release to make all these subplots mean something. I think it was definitely better than the first one. With a few minor adjustments the film could have been great.
bdd 12/26/2007 10:47:39 AM
An Aliens movie made within the last 20 years that sucks?! Wow! A shocker!
TheSleeper 12/26/2007 10:53:43 AM
Once again, we fans have gotten the shaft with a sub-par product. And I do mean product, because Fox clearly wants to just pump these out by the numbers, and hopes we'll all just eat it up the way dung beetles eat what they eat. The logical inconsistencies and plotholes abound (The movie's pretty much one big WTF?), but seeing that Paul WS Anderson had a role in writing the script, it could be no other way. This movie sucks, and in the end it isn't even fun on a bad level, because you know with the source material it could have been so much more. It's official now, kids. No need to see this thing in the theaters. Go check out "Walk Hard" instead--at least there the laughs are intentional. In space, no one can hear you scream...but in AVP-R, everyone can hear them laugh at you in derision.
joeybaloney 12/26/2007 11:25:27 AM
I've got no intention of seeing this. I am interested in hearing what WISEGUY, wessmith & mckracken think of it though. Not trying to start anything with that. Just honestly interested in your opinions as fans of the first. TheSleeper - if you're eating dung beetles I think the people at Fox have already won.
TheSleeper 12/26/2007 11:50:00 AM
Stuff a sock in it with that "I'm not trying to start anything" crap, joeybaloney. It's clear what I meant.
joeybaloney 12/26/2007 11:52:00 AM
: ) Wiseass comment aside I agree with you on this flick/franchise.
mckracken 12/26/2007 12:19:25 PM
I havent seen it yet Joey (but dear God why lump me in with WISEGUY? ouch!) I *did* have high hopes for this one with new director leading the movie but apparantly getting rid of Paul Anderson as director and still letting him write the script was a bad move after all?) I had never really noticed that the predator dreds were part of the armor before Rachel mentioned it...I'm gonna have to go back and look at stock photos of Predators with and without the mask on to see for myself.
wessmith1966 12/26/2007 12:45:30 PM
Alien and Predator were such amazing genre films, but the combination of the franchises has now produced two films that haven't lived up to the hype or the possibilities. I must admit that I liked a lot of the first film because even though it wasn't all it should have been I was entertained and wanted more. This one really didn't entertain me much at all. I was very disappointed. Yes, it was dark, and not in a good way. Darkness can be used effectively in films (the original Alien), but it seems that the darkness was used to mask deficiencies instead of to add mood. The darkness really hindered my enjoyment of the battle scenes. The character development was laughable and so shallow a sixth grader could have written the dialogue (sorry, don't mean to be condescending to sixth graders). There were more plot holes than you'll find in the finest swiss cheese, and if you saw the red band trailer you've seen the best parts of the film. The writers played with established mythology too much (gestation time for one) and it seems like it was only done for time constraints. That's just weak writing. I was probably expecting too much from this film, that's why I'm being hard on what I saw.
GeneralDisarray 12/26/2007 12:48:57 PM
Regardless of all the slams its taking, I still liked it 100x better than the first AvP !
1 2 3 4 >  >>  

ADD A COMMENT

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Please click here to login.

USER REVIEWS

Aliens vs Predator: Requiem

by RadcliffeV
Grade: F-
I should note that I didn’t like the first Alien vs. Predator...     

Wow

by richardfojtik7
Grade: A+
I just don't think the studios in Hollywood will ever Learn. Although I... 

MORE CONTENT BY RACHEL REITSLEFF

POPULAR TOPICS