Movie Feature


Where Have All The Faces Gone?

By: Rob Zombie
Date: Sunday, November 20, 2005

(Rob Zombie's THE DEVIL'S REJECTS was released on DVD last week.)

Yeah, I know I sound like Norma Desmond whining in the film Sunset Blvd. pining for the glory days of silent pictures. But seriously where have all the great faces gone? I'll tell ya where they've all gone. They've all gone to Goddamn Dr. 90210 or the friggin' unemployment line.

There is a new sickness going around (well, actually it's been going around for sometime now, but it's getting worse than ever) that no one should ever get old in Tinseltown. Well, of course no one wants to get old, because no one wants to die, but that's not what I mean. What I mean is our brand new nation of youth obsessed maniacs who are turning everybody into "plastic surgery disasters." I don't want to rant about society at large -- that's a whole different problem -- I want to talk about this sickness as it relates to movies, and, of course, movies have a huge impact on society as a whole. So it's all interrelated, really.

Basically, my beef is that Hollywood has decided that anyone over the age of 25 is over the hill and should be stuck in a rest home. Last year, while shooting The Devil's Rejects, I heard many of the actors involved complaining that they can't get work anymore because they are too old. Too old! I say once a great actor, always a great actor. This youth propaganda really pisses me off, and here's why.

This age-ism thing is killing the movies and killing some of our greatest actors. Think back on some of the silver screens most famous characters and the roles they've become famous playing. Bela Lugosi was 50 when he first burst onto screen as Dracula... 50! These days, any casting agent would laugh in poor Bela's face if he walked into that audition. Okay, how about Clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry? Well, he was 41. Or one of my personal favorites of all-time Robert Shaw as Captain Quint in Jaws. He was 48. Jesus, Peter Cushing was 64 when he did Star Wars, and he was still cool.


These days I'll bet every one of those choice roles would most likely be filled by some hairless, talentless, pretty boy yanked off some WB television show and paraded across TRL for us all to love and admire. Boring!

The problem is that Hollywood has unfortunately convinced themselves that young people only want to see young people. I know for a fact that this is not true. When I was a kid, I didn't look up to other runny nosed kids. I wasn't thrilled to see other kids do anything. I wanted to watch larger than life adults, not a bunch of young punks like me. I wanted to see Steve McQueen, John Wayne, Charles Bronson, Clint Eastwood and... well you get the point. These guys are the stuff legends are made of.

The thing is studio people forget it takes time to become good at something. I'm not saying that young actors are bad, I'm just saying they can't do everything and that they don't have the grit older actors do. A more mature actor has developed a style, a swagger, a vibe that a younger, more inexperienced actor can only fake.

Whenever I screen The Devil's Rejects for someone, they always comment on the amazing faces that are in the film. The truth lies in a person's face. A person's life experience is etched across their face, sometimes painfully plastered across it. Think of Sid Haig (age 66) and you think of that face. Think of Danny Trejo (60) and you think of that face. The same goes for Bill Moseley (53), Ken Foree (63) and William Forsythe (50). Now I ask you, do any of these gentlemen seem too old to kick serious ass? I think not.

In fact, they seem like they would rip the heads off the cast of the O.C. and eat them for breakfast with a side of bacon. But the conventional Hollywood wisdom would say that they are far too old for most viewers. They can't possibly hope to play the lead anymore, maybe they can play the nothing role of the kindly grandfather, the homeless bum or the uptight butler. This is total bullshit.

Thank God there are still a hand full of actors out there secure enough not to fall prey to this age-ism crap. This sick new trend of male actors running out and getting a frigging face-lift because they see a wrinkle is insane! It makes me sick! Where would we be if Charles Bronson or old, squinty-eyed Clint Eastwood was afraid of a few laugh lines?

And as far as woman go, don't even get me started. That's a whole other subject that I don't have the space to get into. I don't know about you, but I don't find 19-year-old skeletons with overstuffed Mick Jagger lips and lopsided plastic hooters attractive. All I see is a girl who hates herself. Basically, by today's standards, I guess Marilyn Monroe was a big, fat disgusting pig. We must stop this insanity.

In closing, I would just like to say two words: Christopher Lee. This cat is 83 years old, and every time he walks on camera in any movie, he steals the scene...owns it. That is the mark of an experienced professional.


More Content By Rob Zombie
Where Have All The Faces Gone?
(Sunday, November 20, 2005)
Fandango Logo
Comments/Responses
1
• Nov 20, 2005, 06:24pm •
I agree wholeheartedly with this. Think of the difference between the original "House of Wax" and the new one. Vincent Price was someone who commanded the screen and had a face that was extremely watchable, whereas the new one featured a cast that seemed already made of wax (with the largest insult being Paris Hilton). I wish Hollywood would return to actors with character rather than vacant pretty people.

• Nov 20, 2005, 11:27pm •
Have to agree as well. I loved when Robert Rodriguez commented that Danny Trejo's face was "made for Hi-Def". I like some of the younger actors, but their faces are so smooth and lack for charecter and texture that it's almost a waste to put them on film, much less hi-def. I just don't ge the same charge out of looking at a younger actor that I get froms seeing an older actor or actress with some lines in their face. Looking at these kids is like staring at a bowl of runny mashed potatos.

mckracken • Nov 21, 2005, 01:25am •
I TOTALLY agree. I havent touched House of Wax (remake) it scares me LOL! But at least theres a few directors willing to use the older established crop like Rob Zombie does in his two flicks, Robert Rodriquez too and Quentin Tarantino.

Casting choices are up to the director so blame them for going younger, its not the actors fault they past 25!

mckracken • Nov 21, 2005, 01:27am •
Christopher Lee... heh... 83 and with the aid of CGI can weild a lightsaber against the best of them. The dude cant even WALK anymore and he still fights like a champ!

• Nov 21, 2005, 09:34am •
Great article, and I think anyone who truly loves movies will agree. Great actors get better with age, because they learn to use their age as a part of their charcter's identity. Sean Connery and Spencer Tracy are prime examples; the lines in their faces only add to their performances. Robert Deniro is a perfect example. Jessica Tandy in "Driving Miss Daisy" was simply brilliant, graceful and beautiful...wrinkles and all. I don't mind young actors, but give me actors whose faces show some personality. House of Wax was aptly named, because all of the performers were waxen in their performances. Sure, they looked good (except Paris Hilton - I don't find her the least bit attractive), but there was no life in them at all. Do young actors even learn how to act anymore, or do they just get thrown in front of the camera because they look good in tight, undersized clothing?

• Nov 21, 2005, 10:55am •
I guess this comes down again to, it's ''Hollywood's'' fault and they are once again destroying the future of films. I do agree with the article and yes it's a shame that good actors who are getting older are having trouble with work but, what can WE do for that?

This is more something that the people with the power of casting can change but other then that, people will still go and watch these movies with young kids in them and the cuter they are, the more people will go.

If I was a director or producer, I would of course try to get good actors instead of a cute actor but, sometimes, if the powers that'd be decide that they want so and so in a movie, there is nothing that can be done from the director or the casting people.

Everyone knows Hollywood is a business and like the saying says, there is no other business like showbusiness. The things people do just to be in a movie, the things actors have to do just to win a role is something that is better to stay secret so, think that if your a young actor, do you prefer being typecast or get a job?

Paris Hilton didn't get her role in House of Wax because she went into an audition and ''won'' her role over other actors so, just that should tell you that young actors are there for showing their pretty face and that's it and it is killing movies with potential but when the acting suffers, that's what Hollywood should understand and so far, they haven't.

• Nov 27, 2005, 04:38pm •
Oh for the love of god could you at least have picked a better picture than The Devil's Rejects to base your right on the money rant with? Ehh god knows if it's not the most self indulgant piece of bullshite I've seen in the last ten years.

JetLag • May 29, 2008, 10:25pm •
Couldn't agree more. Thanks for writing about it. Imagine the disaster movie craze of the '70s transposed to today: Earthquake - No Heston, Ava Gardner or George Kennedy!!!!
Towering Inferno - No Paul Newman, Steve McQueen, or William Holden!!! Not that these are the greatest examples, I think your Jaws example is really where it's at. None of those actors in Jaws would fly today. It's a damn shame.

1
Login to post a comment!