LordGeo
12-25-2007, 07:52 PM
I'm not expecting much, and I've read mixed opinions on these games, so I'm wondering if anyone here has actually played either History Channel Civil War (preferably for PS2) or History Channel Battle for the Pacific (preferably for Wii). I can bet the Xbox 360 versions for each would probably be the best, but I don't have a 360, so that version for both games is out. But if you played the 360 versions, then describing the games off of that system is fine.
With a Civil War game made, hopefully a game will come out that uses the time period I want in a FPS the most: World War I.
As for Battle for the Pacific, I know that Call of Duty 3 has been out for more than a year and Medal of Honor Heroes 2 is out, but right now I want to try something that isn't CoD nor MoH. And I heard that the Wii version is a bit of a different game than the 360 version due to different development teams making them.
So, in the end, how are these two History Channel games?
With a Civil War game made, hopefully a game will come out that uses the time period I want in a FPS the most: World War I.
As for Battle for the Pacific, I know that Call of Duty 3 has been out for more than a year and Medal of Honor Heroes 2 is out, but right now I want to try something that isn't CoD nor MoH. And I heard that the Wii version is a bit of a different game than the 360 version due to different development teams making them.
So, in the end, how are these two History Channel games?