Dragon Box Z Vol.1

[Daichi]

© 2009 BIRD STUDIO/SHUEISHA, TOEI ANIMATION. ©1989 TOEI ANIMATION CO., LTD. Licensed by FUNimation® Productions, Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Dragon Ball Z and all logos, character names and distinctive likenesses thereof are trademarks of TOEI ANIMATION.

Updated Release Date: 11/17/09
Old Release Date: 11/10/09

[PhilipReuben]

Does a fan-made mockup really belong here? It's very close to the actual box art from the photos we've seen, but it isn't 100%. (For one thing, there's a typo in the text.)

[Daichi]

Ok I included the pic taken from the trailer by funi on youtube this time, sorry about that.

[Daichi]

Alright, new pic added, (sorry for double post)

[PhilipReuben]

Much better :D And doesn't it look pretty?

[Daichi]

Originally Posted by PhilipReuben

Much better :D And doesn't it look pretty?

Hell yah it does :D

[Baby Naruto]

Will you please add the link to the YouTube Trailer uploaded by FUNimation?

Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWcpVP12Cqc

[WTK]

It's a really nice artwork. It's much nicer than the sets that are currently out. However I probably won't be getting these anytime soon...

[Betenoire]

I like the image of Goku, but somehow the bright yellow makes his gi look kind of faded or something. And that bright a yellow is great for satellite photos as they won't need to use image intensifying lenses to see the cover from space.

Still undecided as to whether or not I care enough about DBZ to pick this up though.

[Hayate Kurogane]

Originally Posted by Baby Naruto

Will you please add the link to the YouTube Trailer uploaded by FUNimation?

Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWcpVP12Cqc

1) You've already added the link in your post (and now quoted in mine), so mission accomplished.

2) While there's nothing precisely wrong with adding links to trailers and such in these threads, folks should (and do) know, since this is the Cover Art forum, that trailers are more at home in a number of other forums before this one, such as in an existing thread in the R1 forum, which is possibly why it has not been included in the original post.