Comic Book Review


BATMAN #641

By: Kurt Amacker
Review Date: Thursday, July 07, 2005

After fiddling about with Jason Todd's return for over a year, DC finally resurrected the once-dead Robin in BATMAN #638. Rather than explaining his reappearance immediately, Judd Winick and company dragged out the revelation to this issue, wherein Jason finally reveals himself to Batman. Unfortunately, few answers are forthcoming, but I can only assume that INFINITE CRISIS will tie up the loose ends.




Admittedly, a few months ago I would've been incensed with this ending. However, DC has thus far proven that it intends to reveal all and we're not likely to be left wondering about Jason's return by the end of the year. Hence, I'm patiently waiting to see Jason's role in the coming INFINITE CRISIS event. Aside from the few answers BATMAN #641 offers, there's a fight a single, issue-long brawl between Bruce and Jason. DC seems to devote entire issues to fights, and I can't say it thrills me. I like violence in comics, but DC favors "exposition brawls" wherein characters explain everything to each other and the readers while they beat the hell out of each other for an entire issue. See TEEN TITANS #22 if this remains unclear.




While Jason and Bruce brutalize each other, we learn that the former plans to "go all the way" and become a hero that kills. Of course, Batman disapproves, though it's difficult to argue with killing the Joker even Frank Miller seemed to agree in THE DARK KNIGHT RETURNS when one considers the lives that such an act would save.





Doug Mahnke's pencil-work continues to impress. His gritty, industrial landscapes provide an appropriate background to the brawl in question, and his character designs are stylish without being excessively stylized. Unfortunately, he occasionally resorts to the solid, single-color backgrounds I love so much in an artist. Then again, he probably has more work on his plate than I do, so I'll temper my criticism.




BATMAN #641 concludes this story arc. This issue and those that preceded it merit your attention, if only for their historical significance Jason Todd's back, for God's sake. However, the arc was quite good overall, and it will be interesting to see how it leads in to INFINITE CRISIS.



Questions? Comments? Let us know what you think at comicscape@cinescape.com.




More From Mania

Batman: Gotham Knight (also w/special edition)

Bat Battle: Who's The Best Movie Batman Ever?
(Friday, January 11, 2008)
Comicscape - June 29, 2005
(Wednesday, June 29, 2005)
Batman Begins
(Monday, February 28, 2005)
BATMAN: DARK KNIGHT DYNASTY
(Wednesday, October 25, 2000)
BATMAN: GOTHAM KNIGHTS - Devin Grayson
(Wednesday, October 18, 2000)
BATMAN & TARZAN: CLAWS OF THE CATWOMAN
(Wednesday, September 13, 2000)

See more related content
More Content By Kurt Amacker
Comments/Responses
1
• Jul 07, 2005, 10:30am •
It was a good ride. It's funny that DC sold this as two seperate arcs even though the climatic moment of the second arc was the opnening of the first arc. No offense to anyone, but I am a little weary of stories being written so thay can fit cheaply into trade paperbacks. Just write the story and let the people who didn't buy it the first time worry about getting the back issues.

Sorry. Went off on a tangent...

• Jul 07, 2005, 01:07pm •
Hey you live in a place without a comic shop and you'll change your tune about trade paperbacks. Besides getting back issues is a pain in the ass. This isn't like the early 90's when comic shops were on every courner and they carried like three months of back issues. Now a days it's all limited titles and maybe if you're lucky a month back.

• Jul 07, 2005, 01:30pm •
Sorry Jez, guess I hadn't really considered that. Still, if you're looking for back issues, East Coast Comics is okay. Mile High Comics usually has the better deals though. They are both dependable and I use them when my shop sells out of a specific issue.


• Jul 08, 2005, 09:17am •
I though it was fun to read and to see Batman questioning himself that much and all was interesting but, I guess I'm still kind of sad that from now on, death in comics means nothing anymore. It's sad to see all these people who had a huge impact on the other characters when they died and for years, the people who were still alive had to struggle with that fact. Yet now, it's all about bringing those death characters back because yes you can have great stories and all with them coming back alive but, if they stayed dead, there could be other greats stories to write about but it appears they are harder to write.

I mean, if now, Jason Todd, Jean Grey, Colossus and even Bucky, whom was the only other character beside Uncle Ben from Spider-Man who I though would never comeback alive, now it appears he may be alive? Just wait and see, in a couple of years, Uncle Ben will come back as a man re-married, had 3 other kids because he got younger for X reason, was stuck in a not so distent dimension but couldn't come back because he was so happy where he was but now the guilt brough him back...just wait, it's coming. I mean, yes I guess death is a subject that is open to change in the ''reality'' of comics but still, there are things that should not change, death is death, don't kill someone if someone will bring him back in a couple of years.

• Jul 08, 2005, 12:00pm •
This is to much DC is getting worse than Hollywood at remaking classic stories. I love how HAWKMAN was brought back and also Green Arrow. But if anything Jason Todd should be in a entirely different story line like ALL STARS. HAL JORDAN should have remained the SPECTRE and I fear BARRY ALLEN's return could be on the horizon. Or even better make Jason Todd a Green Lantern, Spectre, Dr Fate or how about an agent of Ra's or Darkseid or even Black Manta. Quit ressurrecting the dead unless you are going to be superbly original with it. Make Jason Todd a Vampire. DC needs a character thst will put BLADE to shame.

1
Login to post a comment!