BATMAN: UNDER THE RED HOOD Review - Mania.com



DVD Opinion

Mania Grade: B-

14 Comments | Add

 

Rate & Share:

 

Related Links:

 

Info:

  • Title: Batman: Under the Red Hood Two-Disc Special Edition DVD Review
  • Rated: PG-13
  • Cast:: Bruce Greenwood, Neil Patrick Harris, John DiMaggio, Jensen Ackles
  • Writer: Judd Winick
  • Director: Brandon Vietti
  • Distributor: Warner Bros Home Entertainment
  • Original Year of Release: 2010
  • Extras: See Below
  • Series: Batman: Under the Red Hood

BATMAN: UNDER THE RED HOOD Review

The Unexpected Return of a Sidekick

By Tim Janson     July 20, 2010
Source: Mania


BATMAN: UNDER THE RED HOOD Review
© Mania

The latest DC Comics Direct-to-video Animated film is an adaptation of the “Under the Hood” storyline that ran in issues of Batman in 2005 – 2006. The film is a mostly faithful adaptation of the comic arc with some minor changes in the cast of characters and story elements. The story begins with the 1988 “Death in the Family” storyline as the second Robin, Jason Todd, is being beaten to a bloody pulp with a crowbar by the Joker. He’s locked in a warehouse with a time bomb that explodes just as Batman arrives to attempt to save him.

Five years later, a new vigilante is on the scene posing as an upstart crime lord looking to take over the drug trade in Gotham City. He takes the guise of “The Red Hood” who Batman fans will recall is what the Joker called himself before becoming the Clown Prince of Crime. The Red Hood begins muscling in on Black Mask’s territory and its clear he doesn’t hold to Batman’s moral code about killing. When Batman, along with Nightwing, pursue Red Hood across the rooftops of Gotham, Batman recognizes the movements, skill, and mannerisms of someone who should be dead…Jason Todd.

Now this is no spoiler as the Hood’s identity is revealed early into the film and will of course be known if you’ve been following Batman in the comics in recent years. To be certain, Batman exhumes Jason’s grave to find a fake body. Somehow, Jason is back, and he wants revenge on the Joker. When Black Mask busts Joker out of Arkham Asylum, Jason has retribution in his reach and Batman now has to protect his archenemy from his former partner.

Under the Red Hood is easily the most violent DC animated film yet. The Red Hood’s first appearance finds him carrying the severed heads of several crime boss underlings in a duffel bag, just to show he is serious about taking over. Later, the Joker guns down several of Black Mask’s henchman in cold blood. The violence was surprising given the fact that DC still likes to partly target kids, but this one is amped up for adult comic book fans.

As mentioned, there are a few differences between film and comic…generic henchman take the place of more well-known villains like Deathstroke, and Count Vertigo, as supporting characters. In the film, Jason’s body is clumsily explained as Batman being too distraught to recognize a fake body whereas in the comic, Clayface posed as Jason’s corpse.

“Under the Red Hood” has a terrific cast of voice actors; probably the best of any DC animated film yet. Bruce Greenwood is fantastic as Batman but it is John DiMaggio who steals the show as a terrifyingly psychotic Joker. With Mark Hamill hanging up the reins as the Joker’s voice, DiMaggio will hopefully be the heir apparent. Others include Jensen Ackles (Supernatural) as Jason Todd/Red Hood, Neil Patrick Harris as Nightwing, Wade Williams as Black Mask, and Jason Isaacs as Ra’s al Ghul. Hopefully Marvel Comics will some day realize the value of using top talent for the voice acting in their animated features.

As good as the film is, you can’t help but think that the whole idea of bringing Jason Todd back was simply a bad idea. I realize that deaths in comic books are rarely for good but this is one that should have been permanent. There was no good reason to bring him back other than as a gimmick storyline. But, since Jason’s death was a gimmick in the first place, complete with a 900 number fans could call to vote for if he lived or died, its not surprising. Still, the fans spoke in 1988 and Jason should have been left to rest in peace.

 

Extras

DC Showcase Presents Jonah Hex(12:00). This is the second in the DC Showcase series of shortfilms, the first of which featured the Spectre. Jonah Hex would not be in my top 20 characters I’d like to see in these Showcase films but I understand why he is, given the release of the big screen film (however terrible it may have been). The film is better than expected thanks to the screenplay by Joe R. Lansdale, master of the weird western. Jonah is on the trail of a wanted criminal and ends up in a town where a local Madame lures strangers to their death with a couple of accomplices. A good cast featuring Thomas Jane as Jonah Hex, Linda Hamilton as the Madame, and Michelle Trachtenberg as a barfly makes this one fun to watch.

First Look: Superman/Batman Apocalypse. A look at the next DC animated film which will tell the tale of Supergirl arriving on Earth and being caught between Batman, Superman, and Apocalypse. This will debut on DVD in September.

Robin: The Story of Dick Grayson (24:00). This documentary looks at the history of the first Robin, Dick Grayson. It seems that Robin was created for no other reason than to give Batman someone to talk to rather than to just talk out loud to no one while solving crimes. Features interviews with numerous comic professionals including Paul Levitz, Marv Wolfman, and longtime Batman writer Denny O’Neil. Well-made documentary!

Bruce Timm presents two episodes from Batman: The Animated Series featuring Robin.

COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

Showing items 1 - 10 of 14
1 2 >  >>  
Chopsaki 7/20/2010 1:37:04 PM

Another great DC animated movie. Great voice actors though you can't really replace Kevin Conroy & Mark Hamill. Bruce Greenwood held his own as Batman but I'm not quite sold yet on John DiMaggio. He nailed the laugh but his speaking voice takes some getting used to. An emotional and rather brutal begining really sets the tone for this entry. Definitely worth checking out.

animefanjared 7/20/2010 2:09:28 PM

I'm disappointed in the quality of the review.  The grade B- isn't exactly a glowing endorsement, but the review doesn't really explain what was wrong with the movie to merit the score.  Are there problems with the plotting?  Is the movie too short for the story it's trying to tell (or too long)?  Does it lack emotional heft? 

I'm not upset that the movie got a merely decent score; it may very well deserve it.  I *am* disappointed that the review doesn't explain where the movie failed to live up to expectations.

LooneyBinJIm 7/20/2010 6:44:12 PM

This movie deserved an A easily. The only drawback is like Planet Hulk, certain characters from the books were subbed out. Also, I really wish they would take a gamble and do a 1 1/2 to 2 hr movie.

DC seems to excel over Marvel in their animated movies as well. Maybe they should just forgo the live action and reboots and concentrate on animated features. Or at least CGI.

tjanson 7/20/2010 7:42:33 PM

No a B- isn't a glowing review but neither is it negative.  As mentioned changing the supporting characters from well-known villains to generic thugs didn't work for me and clearly DC wanted to go on the cheap here...not to mention that they made Batman look like a twit for not recocnizing Jason's body was fake...the guy is the world's greatest detective and he's going to miss that?  And as stated in the last paragraph, while I liked the film, I didn't like the idea of Jason being brough back.

animefanjared 7/20/2010 8:21:57 PM

Now that last comment is the more direct criticisms I think should have made it into the review.  The reviews mentions that members of Batman's rogue's gallery are subbed out with nameless thugs, but doesn't explicitly state that this is positive or negative (clearly, you felt it was a negative).  Although I know some fanboys will always disagree, I don't feel that changing details from the source material for film adapatations is inherently bad, so I think the review should more explicitly state that this particular change works against the story. 

As for the idea of Jason Todd being brought back, that idea is at the route of the source material, and holding it against the film seems a tad unfair.  Now, if the review stated that bringing back Todd lacked emotional resonance in the film because the character was underdeveloped (since as far as I know, Jason Todd hasn't really appeared in any film or television incarnations of Batman), that would seem like a more valid criticism.  Or you could make the argument that reviving Todd somehow betrays a core element of the Batman mythos and feels unconnected to the characters and the world they are shown to inhabit.  But the review reads like you came in with a bias against the film's core conceit and therefore would never have liked it, in which case you have not given a fair review.

SonicManJosh 7/20/2010 8:24:58 PM

 The movie certainly improved upon Jason's original means of resurrection (ala Superboy Prime's dimension punching o' doom)

Muenster 7/21/2010 6:12:22 AM

My only complaint was that it was too short. DC really should try to go for a 90 to 120 minute feature sometime. This one played out like 3 episodes stitched together. Bruce Greenwood's voice was damn near perfect for Batman, and DiMaggio's Joker was fantastic. He even seemed to channel a bit of Mark Hamill(who really set a high bar for the animated voice) for the role.  

tjanson 7/21/2010 7:32:52 AM

anime...how does a B- grade imply that I had a bias against it and didn't like it?  I consider a B- to be a positive grade.  Not overwhelmingly positive but still positive.  What are only A grade positive anymore?  I had no bias because i had not read the comic series and only did my research on it AFTER watching the film. 

tiredjay 7/21/2010 5:35:55 PM

The bias is that you're faulting the movie based on what it's adapted from, rather than the movie itself.  It's like saying you didn't really like the idea of a flying crime-fighter in tights while reviewing a Superman project.

tjanson 7/21/2010 9:41:41 PM

The bias is that you're faulting the movie based on what it's adapted from, rather than the movie itself.

Try to stay with me here, champ...I JUST said I didn't read the comic arc that the film was based on.  I had no bias.  Bringing Jason back was a stupid idea.  Franly I think Starlin ought to kick Winick's Ass over this.  But that's the problem with comic book writers today...they all try to go for the big splash.  That's why a douchebag like Bendis could never carry the jockstrap of guys like Roy Thomas, Len Wein, Stan Lee, Or Denny O'Neil.

1 2 >  >>  

ADD A COMMENT

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Please click here to login.

POPULAR TOPICS