Comic Book Review


Civil War

By: KURT AMACKER
Review Date: Friday, June 16, 2006

I realize I already reviewed the first issues of both CIVIL WAR and its companion series, FRONTLINE. But, I couldn't ignore this issue. By now, the Internet has cracked in half with the news about the final two pages of this second issue of Marvel's CIVIL WAR. If you're one of the five people that don't know already, consider this your spoiler warning. This is your last chance to turn back.

All right, I warned you, fanboy. To show his support for the recently enacted Superhero Registration Act, Spider-Man unmasks at a press conference and reveals his identity to the world. It's not a stand-in, it's not a robot, and it''s not a clone -- at least not yet. Peter Parker finally comes clean. I must admit I was a little taken aback by Iron Man's unmasking in CIVIL WAR: FRONTLINE, but I didn't expect this. I'll give Marvel credit for dropping a hell of a bombshell. Unfortunately, the buildup to the grand unveiling feels more like blasé setup than a part of the epic that CIVIL WAR will likely turn out to be. Mark Millar quickly establishes both the passage of the Superhero Registration Act, the assembling of a resistance force under Captain America (with Nick Fury's support, apparently), and S.H.I.E.L.D.''s enforcement of the new law -- most notably against the Young Avenger, Patriot. All of those should, in and of themselves, take more space then they get in this issue. Maybe I should just pick up all of the crossover titles to get the full story.


Regardless, this isn't a bad read. Unfortunately, even the best ongoing comics are hindered by the brevity of a single month's issue. But, aside from the dynamite ending, it feels like the writer wants to establish a few subplots just as quickly as if he'd explained them to you. However, Millar still manages to squeeze in a few interesting character moments, most notably between Reed and Sue Richards. Reed explains to Sue that, from a mathematical standpoint, the Marvel Universe is on the fast track to the apocalypse given the amount of vigilante activity and its quantifiable effects. Though it won't surprise me if Captain America and the resistance are ultimately given the moral high ground by the end of CIVIL WAR, it's nice that Millar and Marvel have taken the time to explore other points of view. But, maybe I'm wrong.

I doubt anyone's going to start CIVIL WAR with the second issue and work their way backwards. But, if the unmasking finale sounds enticing, grab the first issue and catch up before the real fighting starts.


Questions? Comments? Let us know what you think at comicscape@cinescape.com.


More Content By KURT AMACKER
Comicscape: The Kirkman vs. Bendis Steel Cage Match
(Wednesday, October 1, 2008)
Comicscape: Saving Superman's House
(Wednesday, September 24, 2008)
Holy Shitaki, Batgirl
(Wednesday, September 17, 2008)
X-FORCE #6
(Wednesday, September 17, 2008)
PUNISHER: WAR JOURNAL #23
(Monday, September 15, 2008)
Comicscape: What Expands Must Contract
(Wednesday, September 10, 2008)
Comicscape: Warner Bros. Takes DC to the Movies
(Wednesday, August 27, 2008)
Comic Review: DRACULA MEETS THE WOLFMAN #1
(Monday, August 25, 2008)
Comicscape: Robert Kirkman Calls You Out
(Wednesday, August 20, 2008)
Comicscape: Waiting for the Trade: What Will Happen to Monthly Comics?
(Wednesday, August 13, 2008)
Fandango Logo
Comments/Responses
1
• Jun 16, 2006, 12:52pm •
I still think I'll wait for the hardback compilation in a couple of years.

• Jun 16, 2006, 03:21pm •
I think it's such a great idea that what Marvel did with this, so cool. It will open so many doors for this character, I'm actually more interested in him then ever before.

mrstonky • Jun 16, 2006, 03:55pm •
Mark Millar is all hype and controversy. This will degenerate into a right old mess, mark my words. Millar's time on legendary British comic 2000AD demonstrated his ability to "re-invent" relentlessly until he destroyed everything that made characters special.

• Jun 17, 2006, 07:13am •
It's too much change. Marvel has never been one to do the massive sweeping changes like Crisis on Infinite Earths (even DC hasn't been able to repeat the magnitude of that set of changes). Disassembled was pretty much a bust (Ant-Man is replaceable, Vision has already been replaced, Avengers Mansion has been replaced, The Avengers re-formed almost immediately, all we lost was Hawkeye, no other long-term effects), Decimation's lasting effects are debatable (there were supposed to be "no more mutants" but all the important mutants kept their powers). There is mounting evidence that this reality has flaws just like the House of M reality did, leaving a loophole for Millar or later writers to say, "Oops, this one's fake too, now back to your regularly scheduled reality." All the fanboys keep saying, "This is good. Peter revealing his identity does so many great things for the character." Name one. What does it do for the character, except make MJ and May walking targets for the grudge-bearing psychos that have plagued Pete all these years? Like mrstonky said, it's pointless controversy, all shock and no substance, all controversy and no planning. This will be undone within a year.

dmedwards • Jun 18, 2006, 11:09pm •
Alright the story caught my attention right away and will probably read it but if this is really so good give it an 'A' rating. There are so many movies and so on reviewed with B ratings it is hard to tell sometimes which is really good, which is good, and what is just average.

Rethink your rating system Cinescape.
D.M.

1
Login to post a comment!