Comic Book Review


CIVIL WAR

By: Kurt Amacker
Review Date: Thursday, September 28, 2006

I applaud Marvel and decry the publisher at the same time. Almost everyone knew Thor would return. And, he does, after a fashion. I applaud Marvel for thwarting everyone's expectations and resurrecting him on the side of those in favor of the Superhero Registration Act. I decry them for the manner in which they resurrected him. Read the issue and you'll understand. It's an all too convenient comic book cliché, but one that Marvel will likely undo within CIVIL WAR itself.

I hate to write so vaguely, but Thor's return builds to the first of two spoilers within this fourth issue of Marvel's controversial event series. The fallout leaves one hero dead and a few ready to favor the Act to stop the bloodshed. The second rings far more personally, when Sue Richards makes a decision that will impact both her family and the conflict between those both in favor of and in opposition to the Superhero Registration Act. In that regard, Mark Millar writes this fourth issue of CIVIL WAR with a more intimate stroke. Though the issue lacks the startling revelation of the second issue or the "holy f-ck" cliffhanger of the third, it resonates with both the moral degeneration of the pro-registration faction and the familial conflict of Sue Richards. It's a quieter chapter in CIVIL WAR, but not an unwelcome one.

Steve McNiven's art continues to impress. My fury over Marvel's delays and selective disclosure aside, CIVIL WAR will benefit in the long run, even if comic shop owners everywhere won't. Though admittedly his work looks a little rougher than his masterstroke first issue, he still balances the humane and the fantastic in his characters with grace. Some artists make their characters look like steroid-riddled caricatures. Others make superheroes so realistic that they subdue any semblance of wonder. McNiven brings humanity to heroes, while still inspiring awe. Look at the close shot of Thor on the slab in Tony Stark's lab, as he looks at Peter Parker with cold, hard eyes. Some artists work for it. Others never find it. McNiven mastered it a long time ago.


It's late and I'm still annoyed, but I'll be damned if it isn't good.

Questions? Comments? Let us know what you think at comicscape@cinescape.com.



More From Mania

More Sellouts: Civil War: Battle Damage Report and Marvel Spotlight: Civil War Aftermath

"Civil War: The Confession"
(Friday, March 23, 2007)
"Civil War: The Initiative"
(Saturday, March 17, 2007)
Civil Words
(Wednesday, March 7, 2007)
Civil War and the Road Ahead
(Wednesday, February 28, 2007)
PAUL JENKINS CIVIL WARS & SIDEKICKS
(Tuesday, September 26, 2006)
CIVIL WAR: FRONTLINE
(Friday, August 11, 2006)
CIVIL WAR: FRONTLINE
(Friday, June 9, 2006)

See more related content
More Content By Kurt Amacker
Comments/Responses
1 2 3 > >>
noblenonsense • Sep 28, 2006, 08:53am •
McNiven's art is well worth the wait. Simply brilliant. Realistic yet awe-inspiring.

evilron • Sep 28, 2006, 09:59am •
This Thor is not the same guy we saw pick up Mjolnor at the end of FF 538. We're lead to believe that it was Donald Blake. The clone Thor has no mortal host. The Mjolnir in Civil War 4 also seems to be some sort of energy weapon created for the clone. I love Thor, but I really do not want to see the clone fight the real Thor. Marvel has done the clone thing to death.
I have actually enjoyed Civil War. My only real problems are with the way some characters are written. Tony Stark comes off as almost too much of an ass. I also have a hard time believing Reed would so blindly follow Tony. All in all though, much better than I thought it would be.

noblenonsense • Sep 28, 2006, 10:31am •
evilron...I agree with you at the heart of your comments. I'm flat out anti-reg to the end and despise Iron Man with a passion. I jumped on the bandwagon that said "Millar is setting this up to make Pro Reg look like jerks! This isn't balanced!" But after reading it twice...after thinking about it for a bit. I gotta say I like it. Stark is known for thinking a few steps ahead of everyone. I'm guessing the negative zone prison has been thought of by him (or whomever) for a long time, I'm guessing the idea of a statewide initiative of trained superheroes was thought of a long time ago, and I'm guessing Reed Richards truly believes in fighting the good fight even if its against his friends. Plus if you look at Starks reaction to a lot of whats going on it makes him wonder if its worth it anymore. Thats some good writing.

nax37 • Sep 28, 2006, 12:02pm •
The only thing that makes me go "What the hell are they thinking?" is the new Thunderbolts. The pro-reg guys are going to use super villians to stop the rogue super heros from stopping super villians? Good call. That won't end badly.


freelono • Sep 28, 2006, 12:38pm •
The only problem with this issue, which I loved, was that Millar totally contradicted Cable & Deadpool, by having Cable leave the group...Bad characterization and mars an otherwise entertaining issue. Anyone else notice this?

evilron • Sep 28, 2006, 12:58pm •
I agree that the supervillian idea is too far-fetched. I realize that it is all part of the plot, but it's not very believable. With the whole negative zone prison. I can believe that Stark may have started this years ago. But Tony keeping the Thor hair sample. To me it's all a bit too Batman (JLA Tower of Babel) for me.

evilron • Sep 28, 2006, 01:05pm •
freelono, I don't usually pick up Cable and Deadpool. What happened ?

shadowprime • Sep 28, 2006, 01:21pm •
While I am enjoying CIVIL WAR on one level, on another level, I think the conflict at its core is a hugely artificial one, not treated with real seriousness... and that, for me at least, impacts my enjoyment on a really fundamental level.

Stop and think about the Anti-Registration position. Basically, it amounts to this - "Anyone who dons a mask and a costume has the right to be a vigilante. To personally decide what laws to obey, and which to break. To not follow any of the basic laws or guidelines re privacy, warrants, right to avoid selfincrimination, etc (think of how many times you see superheroes break and enter, eavesdrop, coerce witnesses, engage in pitched battles in the middle of crowded cities, etc). To use whatever level of violence that masked person chooses, whenever and where ever that person chooses. Without consequence. To inflict collateral damage as that person sees fit. Without any training. Without any accountability."

THIS is a noble cause? ONLY within the totally artificial MARVEL and DC universes! If you really THINK about the alleged 'high minded' principle being defended here, it should give you nightmares! All you have to do is imagine some cretin putting on a mask, kicking your door down in the middle of the night, and threatening your family with a gun if you don't spill the beans re some corporate wrongdoing at your firm to see where this leads. Shoot... you don't even need to go that far. Was that Captain America I saw, in an earlier issue, tossing a SHIELD agent out into the middle of oncoming traffic, causing a high speed pile up of police cars - cars doubtless filled with "average joe" cops trying to prevent what was, clearly, a "jail break"? THAT is heroic? Remind me again, please - what exactly is Cap fighting for here?

Suspension of disbelief is a part of the comic book experience, obviously, and as a fan, I gladly play along. In this case, however, the authors have constructed a scenario that makes that impossible,

fenngibbon • Sep 28, 2006, 01:41pm •
I concur with shadowprime. Supposedly, the original intent was to treat both sides with respect, but clearly the minds behind CIVIL WAR decided that the pro-registration side is the villain, a point of view that, when thought about, is clearly insane. A world where licensing doctors, lawyers, even barbers and hairstylists is fine and dandy, but keeping track of people who could (and did, in the first issue) kill hundreds either intentionally or by negligence is wrong? Please.

Of course, maybe they've taken is position because they're against ALL licensing and registration and they don't care for any government checks on who practices medicine, law, haircutting, etc. I rather doubt that, though; I suspect, the real reason for putting Iron Man, et al. in the black hats was so they could insert some heavy-handed political commentary about the real world. That's a shame for a number of reasons, not the least of which is that to score their political points they're going to seriously damage some of their mainline characters.

nax37 • Sep 28, 2006, 01:56pm •
Actually, Cable's actions still fit with what happened in Cable and Deadpool. The events of CW4 cause Cable to believe that neither side can win the war and so he leaves the resistance and tries to convince the president to end everything. Where's the contradiction?

1 2 3 > >>
Login to post a comment!