Book News
34 Comments | Add a Comment

0


Code Red for DA VINCI

By: News Editor
Date: Tuesday, February 28, 2006
Source: Associated Press

AP reports Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, authors of the 1982 nonfiction book The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail, are suing publisher Random House over the allegation that parts of their work formed the basis of Dan Brown's THE DA VINCI CODE.

If the writers succeed in securing an injunction to bar the use of their material, they could hold up the release of THE DA VINCI CODE, starring Tom Hanks and directed by Ron Howard.

Baigent and Leigh's lawyer claims Brown, was "interested in taking, and took, short cuts rather than doing any of the work himself."

Baigent and Leigh are suing Random House, which also published their book. The company denies the claim and a Random House says they believe the lawsuit was without merit.

"Both books hinge on the theory that Jesus married Mary Magdalene and they had a child, and that blood line survives to this day. The earlier book set out the notion that Christ did not die on the cross but lived later in France," notes AP.

Related Products
Comments/Responses
1 2 3 4 > >>
• Feb 28, 2006, 03:18am •
Why is it these people always wait until the film is about to come out? The books been out for a couple of years now. There's been so much buzz that it's difficult to believe these guys hadn't already checked it out.

• Feb 28, 2006, 07:10am •
They wanted to wait until the movie was ready for release as well as the paperback (which I believe gets released around the same time as the movie). Baigent and Leigh probably think that Random House and Sony will want to settle out of court so there won't be any delays in the releases.

• Feb 28, 2006, 07:50am •
It is strange especially since there have been numerous documentaries linking both books together and one I saw recently claiming the early novel was inspiration for the Davinci Code.Its even stranger that the code was on the bestseller list for years and the movie rights were actually sold years ago

• Feb 28, 2006, 08:13am •
"Taking shortcuts"...?

So writing a fiction novel based on Carolingian/ Merovingian mythology derived from unsubstantiated, quasi-historical (i.e. the life of Jesus) hearsay rates a lawsuit? There goes my script pitch to Mel Gibson on 'The Passion of the Easter Bunny'...

• Feb 28, 2006, 11:43am •
can you honestly sue over a piece that is supossed to be non-fiction? If Baigent and Leigh sue over the da vinici code because it was their idea, is it like their way of saying that they came up with the whole thing over a hooka pipe and Brown is infringing on that copywrite? These guys should be on their knees thanking the guy, because if he hadn't written The Da vinci code, their book would have still been relegated to the back shelf in occult book stores. Now people are actually reading it.

Some people don't really think things through, do they?

• Feb 28, 2006, 12:48pm •
Who cares. Such a ridiculous concept for a story anyway. The Holy Bible already has a wealth of great stories that would make great films. Why do we need a film based on this fictional book?

• Feb 28, 2006, 01:37pm •
If the fictional story contained material that plaigerized the intellectual property of a non-fiction source, for sure you can sue.

However lame the timing seems to be...

lracors • Feb 28, 2006, 01:53pm •
Wes nailed the reason why are doing this now. The rest is immaterial. Face it some of our court system sucks horrible eggs when these types of "subjective" similarities can cause book and film to come to a grinding halt.

wallyrus • Feb 28, 2006, 04:26pm •
This is CLEARLY a publicity stunt! If nobody remembers, Dan Brown mentions "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" by title in The DaVinci Code. It inspired me to buy it for someone as a gift. The only thing this could possibly do is increase ticket sales and sales of both books.

• Feb 28, 2006, 06:23pm •
#6 The Bible is fiction too, and frankly I find the stories very boring.

1 2 3 4 > >>
Login to post a comment!