Comicscape


COMICSCAPE PART DEUX: SHARPENING THE BLADE WITH A SPIKE

By: KURT AMACKER
Date: Thursday, June 29, 2006

Amid all the well-deserved attention for SUPERMAN RETURNS, the two-hour pilot of BLADE: THE SERIES premiered on Spike-TV last night. It stands as a significant move for Marvel Entertainment, as the company continues to adapt its comic properties to new media. Having already kicked the door in at the multiplex quite a few times and having recently entered the direct-to-DVD market with a line of animated films, television stood as the next logical step, I suppose. I don't really count MUTANT X, and you shouldn't, either.

As most know, BLADE: THE SERIES continues the story from the film trilogy that concluded with 2005's incredibly mediocre BLADE: TRINITY. The differences should ring obviously enough -- to its detriment, Wesley Snipes has left the franchise -- replaced by Kirk Jones -- along with the characters Hannibal King, Abigail Whistler, and the rest of the Nightstalkers. The show feels more like the first film than anything else, favoring urban grit over the stylized Gothicism of the second and the idiotic humor of the third. The violence is also surprisingly graphic, though less frequent than in the films. Still, it's R-rated television. At the very bloody end of the pre-credit sequence, I looked at my wife with pleasant surprise and said, "Well, they sure aren't f--king around."" Unfortunately though, the script and characters in this first episode only occasionally rise above par-for-the-course television mediocrity. But, it's not all bad.


After brutally dispatching a Russian vampire masquerading as an army officer, Blade tracks a shipment of experimental vampire bodies to Detroit, sent to Marcus Van Scyver (Neil Jackson) -- a wealthy industrialist, architecture patron, and vampire with the House of Chthon. Once in Detroit, Blade and his tech support, Shen (Nelson Lee), set up their operation in an abandoned warehouse before pursuing the bodies and Van Scyver. After cracking a few skulls and staking some suck-heads, Blade meets Krista Starr (Jill Wagner), a U.S. Army veteran recently discharged and returned home. At first unbeknownst to her, Van Scyver murdered her brother Zack, a familiar desperate to join the ranks of the undead. Of course, Krista doesn't believe in vampires. She only knows that Zack died with a peculiar tattoo on his neck that links him to the House of Chthon. And of course, she has to find a reclusive folklorist to tell her that vampires are real and explain the mythology to her. And, she knows that a stoic vampire hunter in a black trench coat wants to kill Marcus Van Scyver just as badly as she does. There's more to it than that, but I don't want to drop a bunch of spoilers in case a few of you decided to wait for a rebroast or TiVo.

Since New Line announced Jones would play Blade, fan boys everywhere have wondered if anyone could replace Snipes in a role he defined. Before I offer my take, let me digress for a moment. I really enjoyed the first two Blade films. Like several of David Goyer's scripts, the first film suffered from shoddy dialogue, but it remained visually and thematically strong. Stephen Norrington nailed the visuals, and the viewer glimpsed a hidden world within the film. And above all, Wesley Snipes defined Blade. If nothing else in the film succeeded, he grabbed the role by the nuts and twisted. The second one built on the vampires' world and, where the first film dragged the audience through the dark alleys of an urban nightmare, the second flourished with Gothic excess via director Guillermo del Toro. Goyer's much-improved script fleshed out Blade's character even more, allowing Snipes to move past his compelling, but mostly one-note, performance in the first film. The third film mostly sucked and I don't want to talk about it. But, none of the films would've succeeded without Snipes. Before X-MEN and SPIDER-MAN really jumpstarted the comic movie glut of the past five years, Snipes showed everyone that a comic superhero -- and more importantly, a Marvel one -- could work onscreen again. What BATMAN AND ROBIN killed and SPAWN couldn't revive, BLADE resurrected.

That said, no actor is irreplaceable. A new actor can bring a fresh spin to a character, and it need not stand as the end of a franchise. Unfortunately, Jones impersonates Snipes a little too well in manner and tone, and not enough in physique and presence. He deadpans his dialogue infrequently and stoically enough that one can't help but remember that Snipes did it better. Rather than expanding on the character and playing to his own strengths, Jones rehashes his predecessor to his own detriment. His swordplay and martial arts skills seem pedestrian at best. But, I admit that's probably a difficult quality to find in most actors otherwise suited for the part. Unless New Line were to audition professional martial artists over experienced actors, it's probably unavoidable. But, unlike BLADE: TRINITY, I never rolled my eyes when Jones spoke during the pilot. He seems good enough, but never much more than that. If BLADE: THE SERIES continues past the first season, I hope he grows in the role and takes it in directions peculiar to his strengths as an actor. It's the only way to keep the character interesting.

Television production values really hurt this episode the most. Outside of Hurricane Katrina coverage, I haven't regularly watched television in a couple of years. But, I watch a lot of movies. Thank God for DVD. But having done that, I can see the glaring difference between the production values and pacing in most movies and television. Television works by keeping the viewer interested enough to keep watching through a commercial break. Rarely does scripted television enter the sub-textual territory that good films explore. At best, television sometimes offers compelling serialized potboilers -- brain candy that entertains, but rarely forces you to think. I'm sure some of you will remind me that there are certainly exceptions, but the crap-to-gold ratio is disproportionately high. Critics have praised the best television shows by stating that they feel like weekly movies. And unfortunately, BLADE: THE SERIES clearly looks and feels made-for-television. The noticeable decline in production values hampers the show's overall feel. Some may not care, but I do.

David Goyer and Geoff Johns penned the lion's share of the script and, while it's still not great, they managed to squeeze in a couple of moments of comic book and art house weirdness. The show's greatest accomplishment, thus far, remains its villain, Marcus Van Scyver. As Krista turns, she hallucinates a vision of Van Scyver at his death by a tribe of American Indian vampires hundreds of years before the story. She also sees her brother as a child, and chases him through a crimson dreamscape as her body changes into one of the undead. After her resurrection, Van Scyver lectures her on life as a vampire -- an eternity of higher perception and aesthetic appreciation beyond humanity's reach. This admittedly interesting approach to Van Scyver doesn't come across nearly as coy as I've made it sound. In fact, his British poise nearly overwhelms any sense of menace or evil. In lesser writers' hands, I might've accused the film of pandering to Spike-TV's target demographic -- like, dude, won't it be great to see Blade kill that whiny artiste fag? But, the script never mocks Van Scyver and presents a villain more interesting than its hero.

The pilot of BLADE: THE SERIES isn't bad, but it's not great, either. Jones tries too hard to replace Snipes, rather than developing the character. The scale and the production values rarely rise above made-for-television quality. However, the show manages to recapture some of the spirit of the first film, albeit on a smaller scale. The script includes some unexpected character development late in the show, along with some visually compelling dream sequences. I'd watch it again, but there's room for improvement. However, there's also potential.


More From Mania

Comicscape: The Dreaded Comic-Con Recap

Comicscape: Character Contrast in the Dark Knight
(Wednesday, July 23, 2008)
Comicscape February 16, 2005
(Wednesday, February 16, 2005)
Comicscape - December 1, 2004
(Wednesday, December 1, 2004)
Comicscape - September 24, 2003
(Wednesday, September 24, 2003)
Comicscape - June 18, 2003
(Wednesday, June 18, 2003)
Comicscape - November 2002
(Saturday, November 2, 2002)
Comicscape - October 2002
(Thursday, September 26, 2002)

See more related content
More Content By KURT AMACKER
Comments/Responses
1
• Jun 29, 2006, 07:17am •
I agree with the comment about "isn't bad, but it's not great" I think it is important to remember what it is. It is a leaping point from a movie (or comic) to a new media. I think it is akin in quality to the pilot of the Highlander series. I thought that, and many early episodes, were quite mediocre. But eventually it did come into its own and became quite an entertaining series.

shaolinronin • Jun 29, 2006, 08:11am •
I thought it was awful. No redeeming qualities at all. Of course I'll still tune in to see if it improves.

- The 1st 10 - 15 mins are way too rushed. They should have spent more time expanding the storyline and setting us up for the series, instead of cramming almost everything you need to know right in the beginning.
- Jones is trying WAY too hard to be like Snipes' Blade. They would have been better off casting Snipes' stunt double, because that guy at least has some martial arts skills.
- Fight scenes are poorly choreographed and filmed. When you watch Blade fight in the movies, there's a certain rythym, and you can at least see everything.
- Is anybody actually convinced that Krista Starr was not only a SGT in the Army, but that she saw combat? Jill Wagner is gorgeous, and I like her in those Mercury commercials, but her character just isn't interesting or tough.
- So far the bad guy is pretty boring, but I did like the flashback/dream sequence showing his origin.

I agree that there's potential, but a lot of things need to be fixed.

fft5305 • Jun 29, 2006, 10:13am •
I half-watched the first half of it on DVR last night. It was good enough that I will go back and watch the whole thing without distraction just to see what I really think.

nikodemos • Jun 29, 2006, 11:53am •
I loved Blade I and II so much that I can even enjoy watching parts of Blade III. Thus, Blade: The Series realy didn't have to do much to get me as a fan.

But, it really didn't do much.

It was pretty violent at times, but the combat choreography wasn't stellar. Jones was pretty much non-existent in terms of acting or even screen presence... At one point when he was fighting the bald vampire guy, I really couldn't tell who was who. It was sexy at times, but Jill Wagner is going to have to work a little harder to be something more than eye-candy. [***Potential spoiler alert***] As for the "unexpected character development late in the show", I don't know where the writers think they are going with this... it just seems to be a cheap way to "Buffy" her up some so she can fight vampires.

The bad guy seemed pretty much the stock blonde-british-elite-vampire-bad-guy I've seen in about 100 bad vampire movies/TV shows.

I'll keep watching, and hoping for more. I really want it to be a good show, and I think it has a lot of potential. They just kind of need to work on the fundamentals a bit more.

• Jun 29, 2006, 01:18pm •
The comparison to Highlander:The series is probably spot on. That show started off a little weak but really got better and became a favorite of mine. I'll give Blade a chance to improve. If the show gets a second and third season Jones should hopefully become more competent at the action squences.

• Jun 29, 2006, 02:00pm •
This show has a lot of potential. I only watched the first half because I was tired, but taped the second half and will finish it up tonight. It seems like across the board, every critic has said that Jones is trying to imitate Snipes, instead of being his own man. Hopefully, the people who matter will read that criticism and take it to heart. The pilot of a lot of genre show do end up going through the motions to get the "setup" laid out.

I suspect that after 3 or 4 episodes, the cast will get into a rythym and the show will improve dramatically. I thought the acting was a little stilted, but I think the wwriting is decent to good and that is usually what will carry the show.

• Jun 30, 2006, 03:40pm •
After watching the whole show, I would say that my biggest gripe is how wimpy Blade is. Wesley Blade rarely had trouble handling mulitple vamps. When he got into trouble, there was a reason. Kirk Blade seems to have trouble with the run of the mill vamps. If this was Blade: Year One, I could see it, but I thought the series takes place after the movies.

• Jun 30, 2006, 05:11pm •
I agree with most opinions here, it lacks the crispness that the first two movies brought. The writing isn't too bad, the visuals although TV-like are not all bad. I think it would be a vast improvement if Kirk can work on his fight technique and improve the choreography. His Blade lacks the confidence, technique and the almost invulnerability of Snipes' Blade.

rael86 • Jun 30, 2006, 11:07pm •
So, when is he going to discuss Superman Returns? I can't wait to hear what he thinks about it.

• Jul 02, 2006, 01:32pm •
This is Kurt.
Kurt will write about Superman Returns for next Wednesday. Kurt really liked it. He saw it twice. Kurt can't run his comic movie reviews the day they come out because he doesn't usually get into press screenings. Kurt wishes he could, but that's the way it is. Instead, he writes the reviews for people that have already seen the film to initiate a dialogue beyond a recommendation about whether or not to see the film. Kurt doesn't usually write in the third person, but he figure'd he'd try it one time. He won't do it again, he promises.

1
Login to post a comment!