DVD Review


NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN

By: Robert T. Trate
Review Date: Sunday, March 09, 2008

The title of the film indicates that yes, there is no country for old men. Sheriff Bell (Tommy Lee Jones) will never have any of the answers he seeks to why whole the world is changing. Nor will he learn the reason that why men do the bad things that they do. If the film was really from his point of you then why did we spend so much time following Llewelyn Moss (Josh Brolin) and Anton Chigurh (Javier Bardem)? Their resolution was cheated from us when we actually did return to Sheriff Bell. Before that moment the film clearly was a chase movie belonging to Llewelyn and Anton not an old Sheriff who had a perspective about an ever changing world in which he has no part of except as a bystander.

I thoroughly enjoyed the film despite the spotlighting of Sheriff Bell in its conclusion. I know that it is his story but the reason to watch ‘No Country for Old Men’ over and over again is for Javier Bardem. Bardem’s praise and awards for his portrayal of Anton Chigurh are rightfully deserved. Bardem’s best touch is how Anton responds to all the little day to day chatter in the world. His confrontations both bloody and not make the film worth watch all over again. Without him ‘No Country for Old Men’ would be just as boring as its title. 

Bardem plays a sociopathic monster in ‘No Country for Old Men’; a monster that could, at times, seem to have a softer side. Bardem’s softer moments as Anton come out when he speaks to people confronting them with idle back talk. It was his way of giving them a chance to get out or away from the monster they have just come across. Like a dragon with a riddle Bardem, often become frustrated with their stupidity and allows fate to make a life changing decision. His coin toss is done with such precision and forethought that their end could come so quick that the loser would never know it. This character brought to life with such a cold and calculating precision is worth the gold statue. 

Special Features:

“The Making of No Country for Old Men” is a twenty-five minute documentary with cast and crew interviews. Don’t worry, Ethan Coen actually talks more than he did at the Oscars allowing us insight to what he and his brother where trying to accomplish with their multi genre film. Believe it or not the hardest part to cast in “No Country for Old Men” was the part of Llewelyn Moss. However, what was truly fascinating was learning that Llewelyn’s wife (Kelly Macdonald) is actually Scottish. 

“Working with the Coens: Reflections of Cast and Crew” is the best special feature on the DVD. I often wonder about how a two director set works with such films as ‘Sin City’, ‘the Matrix’ and so on. I found the piece enlightening. The praise of the brother’s work ethic and the environment they create to work was refreshing. Obviously they are prolific in their work, but having a cast and crew discussing how the Coens’ set is the most stress free environment really gave you an insight into how they work.

“Diary of a Country Sheriff” features incoherent interviews featuring both cast and crew. I was hoping for and an actual Sheriff’s perspective on the film. This special feature seems as if it is all the extra footage the cast and crew recorded with their insights into movie. A historical perspective of west Texas during the Mexican Brown Dope influx would have been great. However, this special feature is anything but and a disappointment.

Since ‘No Country for Old Men’ is being released so soon after winning its Academy Awards, this is a bare bones, short on frills DVD. There is no commentary by the Coens or any of the stars. A full length commentary by Bardem and Brolin would be great considering they actually have no screen time together. My prediction is that a special edition will be released this fall. It can’t clean up the Oscars and not provoke the studios to release another edition.




More From Mania

And The Oscar Goes To...

Spook Country
(Monday, August 6, 2007)
“Space Cowboys on HD DVD, X;Men: The Last Stand coming to Blu-ray soon.
(Sunday, November 5, 2006)
Harrelson and Root will be OLD MEN
(Wednesday, June 7, 2006)
Paramount's NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN
(Wednesday, December 8, 2004)
ULTIMATE X-MEN
(Wednesday, December 20, 2000)
X-MEN: On Location, Part 2
(Friday, April 7, 2000)

See more related content
More Content By Robert T. Trate
Comments/Responses
1
GentlemenDeath • Mar 09, 2008, 12:44am •
I liked the ending and thought it was a good way to end this kind of a film. I am not sure why people were bothered by it and am curious to know how THEY would have wanted it to end.

Other then that, I agree that it was quite worthy of winning the Best Picture award.

daforce • Mar 09, 2008, 10:58am •
Honestly, if the movie had ended at the end of Anton's last scene, the movie would have had a better ending. The Tommy Lee Jones ending was pointless, boring, out of step with the timing of the rest of the movie, and just plain stupid.

With that said, I agree with the review. Without Bardem, this movie would have been boring and listless. As it was, I still only consider this movie worth a video rental, not a ticket price. You can actually see where the two directors take control in different parts in the movie. Very disjointing, and disappointingly amateur for two directors that have been in movies for as long as the Cohen brothers have been.

miko34 • Mar 09, 2008, 11:47am •
This movie was fantastic. You can't understand it fully on one viewing. You can't compare it to a normal movie to appreciate it. I still think Fargo deserved to win the best picture that year, but No Country deserved the top prize this year and it's not only due to Bardem.

It's a shame they did not put more into this release of the DVD. I'm still waiting for a special edition of Raising Arizona and Hudsucker Proxy.

NotAFan • Mar 09, 2008, 03:35pm •
"No Country For Old Men" is a great title, it's what they should have called the new Indiana Jones movie!

thebigiff • Mar 09, 2008, 05:12pm •
Best movie I've seen since... Pulp Fiction? Er... Fargo... Also I'd have to say one can't say this movie would have been bad if Bardem hadn't been in it. He was in it! It's like saying Star Wars would have been bad without Vader. But he also was in it. What if someone else played the role and did a better job? I thought the whole piece was wonderfully constructed and all players were pertinent to how well the story played et al.

thebigiff • Mar 09, 2008, 05:19pm •
300, Sin City & American Psycho also come to mind...

1
Login to post a comment!