Comic Book Review


"The Dark Tower: The Gunslinger Born"

By: Kurt Amacker
Review Date: Thursday, February 15, 2007

After months of hype, speculation, and delays, Marvel’s Dark Tower prequel miniseries hit comic shops at midnight last Tuesday.  Fans received the series’s announcement some months ago with questions and a touch of controversy.  Marvel artfully obscured Stephen King’s role in the books creation – as Creative Director and Executive Director, rather than writer – before announcing Peter David’s responsibilities in scripting the series.  Thus, David wrote a script from a plot conceived by King and Robin Furth, the author of two companion volumes for the novel series.  Jae Lee has drawn the miniseries beautifully, and provided even stuffy lit-snobs like myself good reason to look at The Gunslinger Born 

I admit to only reading Stephen King’s work occasionally.  I also admit to avoiding most popular fiction (outside of comics) in favor of the backlog of great work left behind by so many literary giants.  But, I’ve also never read any of The Dark Tower series and likely won’t, based upon a few trusted recommendations.  I don’t hate King, but I find him usually lacking as a writer.  However, I resolved to assess The Gunslinger Born fairly and not let my disinterest in the novels affect my opinion of this first issue.  For those new to The Dark Tower, this first miniseries adapts the flashback sequence showing Roland Deschain’s youth from the novel Wizard and Glass, the fourth in the novel series.  The series takes place in Mid-World, a realm that combines western elements with Tolkien-esque high fantasy.  At the start, we see young Roland training to become a Gunslinger – a sacred order of cowboy knights.  To earn his guns, he must challenge and defeat his instructor, Cort.  Though unusually young, Roland impulsively challenges his instructor after discovering his mother in a compromising position. 


To veteran readers of The Dark Tower novels, the story will likely offer few surprises.  I can’t attest to it faithfulness to the flashback from Wizard and Glass, but I can only imagine that with King and Furth’s involvement it should please fans of the novel.  The impetus for adapting this story as the first miniseries springs from the desire to accommodate new readers unfamiliar with The Dark Tower.  Speaking as one such reader, I can recommend The Gunslinger Born for new readers seeking an introduction to the whole series.  Jae Lee’s art never looks less than amazing, making this easily one of the best looking comics on the shelf this month and likely the rest of the year.  I don’t know how closely Peter David’s script resembles King’s novel, but the latter’s prose usually, in my estimation, hinders his work.  In the case of The Gunslinger Born, Lee’s fantastic art with David’s sparser script highlights the strength of King’s story, seen clearer when removed from the novel and recreated for comics.  This is worth a look. 

Questions? Comments? Let us know what you think at comicscape@mania.com.


More Content By Kurt Amacker
Comments/Responses
1
SinisterPryde • Feb 15, 2007, 02:03am •
I've read the novels and loved them. I thought this series was good star, mostly adapting material from the first book and leading into the stuff from the 4th. So far, though, off to a good start!

MercurialHyperbole • Feb 15, 2007, 02:22am •
...

DeviantBoi • Feb 15, 2007, 07:09am •
Anyone know where I can buy this online?

kiba101 • Feb 15, 2007, 08:51am •
Should i wait to buy as graphic novel or is it that good that i have to buy every issue

scoundrel • Feb 15, 2007, 12:34pm •
Kiba, it's a matter of preference. If you like your comics in one big chunk wait for the trade. As an introduction or a serial, it reads pretty well, though.

I liked the first issue. Lee's artwork was absolutely amazing. Generally, I like the Dark Tower as a series but I think King could benefit from a copy-editor.

fft5305 • Feb 15, 2007, 12:48pm •
Is "Gunslinger Reborn" a typo? Or is there another comic out there that I don't know about?

therealjohnny99 • Feb 15, 2007, 10:11pm •
I believe the "Reborn" is a typo. Also, I'm not sure it's entirely accurate to point out the "delays" the book has faced. While the original release date for the first issue was altered VERY early on in the book's production, I have read accounts on Newsarama that the book was actually so ahead of schedule that Lee went back and reworked several panels that he wasn't completely pleased with. That's pretty unheard of in today's industry.

What I would like to know is this: is the plan to adapt the rest of the novels once "The Gunslinger Born" has concluded?

deadcowboy138 • Feb 16, 2007, 12:58am •
Hey guys, Kurt here. Yes, "Reborn" is a typo. I will have it fixed. Sorry about that.

The plan is to continue with a series of prequel miniseries about Roland's youth, presumably continuing into adulthood until the first Stephen King novel.

The "delay" refers to the fact that the book was pushed back from April 2006 to February 2007. It was supposed to be concluded in time for the collection to be released for Christmas of last year. That's what I was referring to, but call it what you like.

ashamel • Feb 16, 2007, 07:27pm •
The comic was very faithful to the language and events of the books. It didn't add anything new (other than an interesting titbit in the story at the back), but I thought it was well done.

I would definitely recommend the books to everyone, especially the first couple which are particularly lean and mean.

1
Login to post a comment!