Mania Discussion

30 Comments | Add

 

Rate & Share:

0
 

Related Links:

 

Info:

DC's Noveck Talks JLA, Supes & Batman

Some of them are not popular answers..

By Jarrod Sarafin, News Editor     October 20, 2007
Source: Voices From Krypton


A snapshot of the Justice League.
© DC Comics

Warner Bros and DC liaison Gregory Noveck-- also the Senior Vice President Creative Affairs for DC Comics--sat down with Voices From Krypton and had some pointed questions directed his way after the last few weeks of press releases. To Noveck's credit, he did answer the questions even if his answers were not well received by a lot of fans. This hasn't been the only bad publicity for their franchises this past week. The Hollywood Reporter published a story earlier this week about a slew of 19-20 year old thespians trying out for JLA roles, something which caused a lot of negative feedback on the decision making inside Warner Bros. By the way, it should be noted that AICN is now reporting all of them were auditioning for only two roles, the Flash and Wonder Woman.

To see what Noveck has to say about these issues, read below.

VOICES FROM KRYPTON: I’ve read some of those earlier versions of the Superman script – Tim Burton as director? Nicolas Cage as Superman? What were they thinking? Even earlier today, there was the Hollywood Reporter story where they’re saying that 19 and 20 years olds are auditioning for Justice League. Does that kind of thing concern you guys at all?


GREGORY NOVECK: Don’t believe everything you read. Some of it may be true, some of it may not be. But I can tell you they’re not casting a 19-year-old as Superman. Most of the actors they’re looking at are in their late ‘20s.


VOICES FROM KRYPTON: And then there are all of those Internet rumors about Tom Welling being cast as Superman…


GREGORY NOVECK: Not happening, if for no other reason than it would just confuse the issue.


VOICES FROM KRYPTON: And if that’s the case, I wonder why they wouldn’t just use Brandon Routh again.


GREGORY NOVECK: I think part of it is that the character is larger than the actor. If you look at Batman, Superman and Justice League as separate franchises, if all of a sudden you have Brandon in it but you don’t have Christian, then what movie is it? I think you have to have it stand on its own. I’m just speculating, but if I’m the director of this movie, I don’t want to have to be too careful of another director’s iteration of a character. If I use his actor, then I’m kind of beholden to it. What if George Miller hired Brandon and Christian, but he wanted Brandon to really play Superman tougher and wanted Christian to show more humanity, then all of a sudden you’re entering very strange creative territory. The same is true of using Tom Welling. I think ultimately it’s a better movie if you have different actors to keep the iterations of the characters distinct. The example I’ve been using is, is it the Mike Mignolia Batman versus the Frank Miller Batman? It’s still Batman, they’re just different versions of it. I think when we start to open up the films with that kind of lens, where you can say, “These are all Superman, but they’re different versions” – even from Tom Welling to Brandon Routh, right? – that’s pretty cool.

To read more, click here.

To read Part 2, click here.

Big thanks to Scooper Monkeyfoot for passing this bit along..

MOVIES REVIEWS

Comments (8) | Bangs (0)
MANIA INTERVIEW & REVIEW:...
Comments (8) | Bangs (0)
MOVIE REVIEW- Valkyrie
Comments (6) | Bangs (1)
DVD REVIEW- Death Race
Comments (3) | Bangs (0)
MOVIE REVIEW #2- THE SPIRIT
Comments (6) | Bangs (0)
MOVIE REVIEW #1- THE SPIRIT
Comments (12) | Bangs (1)
MOVIE REVIEW- The Day the Earth...
Comments (16) | Bangs (0)
PUNISHER: WAR ZONE - The Mania...
Comments (5) | Bangs (1)
Review: WANTED on DVD
Comments (10) | Bangs (0)
MOVIE REVIEW- TRANSPORTER 3
Comments (3) | Bangs (0)
DVD Review of The Man from...

COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

Showing items 1 - 10 of 30
1 2 3 >  >>  
craigtnelson 10/20/2007 12:52:08 AM
Borrr-rrring!
xyde 10/20/2007 1:38:47 AM
Excellent points from Noveck. Although I initially thought its a bad idea & have always thought that a JL live-action feature would not work, I now do have some positive sense of anticipation for this project. If the supposed spoiler news about the JL movie synopsis had some truth in it, I think it would be a successful movie.
dawntreader 10/20/2007 2:32:00 AM
i think they should just drop it. superman is dead. brian saw to that. as for the batman, leave him out if you intend to do this movie, cause the best version is the christian bale version. i think they should rewrite the JLA and use other characters in place of supes and batman. i think if they start duplicating they are going to end up with a messy universe just like thier comics had been. of course they could always do a major trilogy where they bring all the different versions of superman, batman and other various characters together from movies and TV and do the whole consolidation of versions thing like they did in the crisis comics series... nah.
metalwater 10/20/2007 4:44:43 AM
Warner really needs to assemble a "Council Of Nerds" (Fan Boys) to keep them properly centered on their super hero projects. If they had actual Fan Boys working for them, in terms of being the voice for the fans--and the comic books that Warner is attempting to adapt into films, Warner could experience an immediate reversal of fortune, seemingly overnight. And should the studio really open themselves to listening to such a council, they would automatically manage to avoid so many of the major problems like what has befallen them, time...and time again, with JLA, Superman vs. Batman, Tim Burton's Superman, Cat Woman, Wonder Woman, the original Batman franchise, Superman Returns, Superman 3 thru 4--from the original franchise...and certain issues which have unfolded with tv series like Smalllville, Birds Of Prey...as well as various attempted pilot shows. I'm not buying Noveck's interview--he seems to be too much of a Warner insider and apologist--giving "Yes Man" answers and excuses for things that just don't deserve excuses. For instance, I suspect that Bryan Singer is no fan of Superman and never respected the character...this I deduce from the fact that he has admitted in past interviews that he never even read comic books as a kid. He didn't know much about comic book lore whatsoever, and wasn't into such characters at all. Now in a full on bid at revisionist history, he talks about growing up loving and Idolizing Superman???--Bitch please!!! Talk about a fake fan--hence the reason Superman Returns is such an uneven direction-less mess!!! No, judging by the way he butchered Superman Returns...the only thing Singer was after, or respected, was a big fat paycheck--end of story, end of Superman. Tom DeSanto was the muse, and comic book lore expert responsible for the success of The X-Men. He educated Singer on the characters and got him involved with the films. However...without DeSanto to hold his hand and walk him through the mythos of Superman, Singer was lost--sitting around trying to copy elements of the first Superman film, and failing miserably at every turn.
Flint521466 10/20/2007 8:04:42 AM
This movie is gonna flat-out suck balls
monkeyfoot 10/20/2007 11:45:09 AM
Noveck seems to be the standard good PR guy, saying all the right things. I don't think he's lying, just casting things in a more positive light for the companies involved. I'm hoping the script is as good as he says. If the writers know and love the characters like he says. It would be nice to have a complement of qualified fanboys to coach the crew on DC characters but that's what they have Noveck for. As I stated in one of these commentaries before, it would be great if the director George Miller did a press conference or interview talking about his intentions and ideas for the movie. How and why he decided to do the project and did he have any knowledge of the comics previously and what he has now. Plenty of other directors do this in the initial stages, from Raimi on Spider-man to Matthew Vaughn on the upcoming Thor. It only makes good PR sense for a film with such a huge fanbase and buzz. Metalwater, I think I read in previous interviews that Singer was more of a big fan of the first Superman movie than of the comics. He saw it at that critical young age that made a major impression on him. Like kids who saw King Kong or Star Wars at a young age. Fortunately or unfortunately this influenced how he did SR.
gauleyboy420 10/20/2007 1:19:21 PM
GOD DAMN! For people who claim to be such "experts" at how Hollywood works, or should work. You guys (SR Haters) don't know anything about anything. I've said it too many times before but yes I'll say it again. Now I know you won't believe me because that would mean you would have to admit to being mistaken. BUT BRIAN SINGER DID NOT RUIN SR! Personaly I loved it, I gonna go watch it as soon as I'm done posting. It was an homage (psudo-remake of the original) to reintroduce a new generation to the Superman movie mythos. It was IMHO better than the original Superman. It made me believe a man could fly. AND JOHN PETERS was/is the producer, and for all of you Hollywood experts out there, I have a giant news flash for you. PRODUCERS HAVE THE FINAL WORD. The director has to persuade the producer to do things they might not otherwise have done. Like what you ask, Well how about the fact that Singer convinced the money behind SR to allow him to 1. FLY 2. Wear the suit 3. Not fight a giant spider in the 3rd act 4. not have polar bear guards at the FoS 5. Not have a homosexual robot sidekick. If you guys are soooo up to date on the details of SR you'd know that the Producer (John Peters) wanted all of that and more in the latest Superman movie. Singer Saved the movie BECAUSE of his knowledge and love of the character. The ONLY reason he directed the X-films was because he had always wanted to be involved in a Superman movie. Metal enough of your spitefulness towards Singer. He has shown (even before X-1) that he is a very competent and talented director. You have to bust his balls because you didn't like SR, but you cannot take away his success on the x-films. Thats childish to say that he only did them justice because someone held his hand (BTW how many movies have you made?) As long as there are ignorant people trashing Singers Superman, I'll be around to post positively on him, because I want him helming up the next installment. AND I'M NOT ALONE. Dawntreader- Supes aint dead he's alive and kicking. AND the ONLY way JL movie can and should be made is with the holy trinity of DC Comics Supes, Bats, And WW. As for this guys answers, Do you people ever get satisfied? Were you so badly ignored or abused by your parents that you feel the need to complain about anything and everything? This guy gave some good honest answers that made a lot of sense. Do you guys even read comic books?
joeybaloney 10/20/2007 1:33:56 PM
Singer's great. Superman Returns is boring.
cmnorris 10/20/2007 1:57:53 PM
Singer is a great director, but SR did fall short because it was a homage. This isn't the 70s or 80s. Supes needs to be seriously updated. Gauleyboy420 I hate to say it but you are in the minority with your opinions. As far as Noveck's answers go he is just trying to put a positive spin on it because the reason for pushing the JLA is because of the union strikes that are coming. end of story
Flint521466 10/20/2007 1:58:12 PM
Just read over on BOF(batman-on-film.com) that Josh Duhamel read for the Batman role. Again, This movie is gonna suck balls.
1 2 3 >  >>