Deathly Hallows First Look

This book was dull I question why they need 5 or 6 hours of movie for this one some of the other books really needed multiple movies like Goblet which they did great damage to,  this one though does not need 2 movies.  A 2 or 2 and a half hour movie would have been sufficient.

I'm so freaking tired of Harry Potter, aint these kids like 20something now? Harry Potter should be an instructor by now. Bad thing is, after the flicks are done.....can any of the cast move on without being typed-casted to this series???? Maybe Emma Watson, but she'll have to do a 180 away from Harry Potter and do more grown-up material. Others? Maybe

I enjoyed the Books (All of them). I think its 5 to 6 hours because there was allot of back story that needs to filled in. I also get that the gravy train is coming to an end and they need it to last just a bit longer. Watch WB will do the 3D treatment to the whole franchise and rerelease in theaters and IMAX. Dont complaine to much these movies are paying for Justice League.

I loved the books as well but I've gotten tired of the movie stuf. I'll rent the rest of them

But,... the first one will be on my Birthday,  I just have to see it!

loved the books, loved the movies. will watch.

I'm not sure what book you read BigKidd but DH definitely needs two films to do it justice.  Like pilgram said there is a lot of backstory to tell.  With so many key plot points that affect the ultimate ending, they couldn't cut a lot out like they did in GOF or OOTP.  To fit the tale of the brothers and the Deathly Hallows themselves,  Dumbledore's secret past, finding and destroying each Horcrux, not to mention the huge battle at the end which will take up at least a half hour alone, it is easy to fill up 2 full films.  Although I've had small problems with some of the films, overall I have enjoyed them immensely and these I'm sure will be the best of the lot.

This movie better have Dumbledore's gayness in it or it will suck.  They gotta hint at it at least, I mean they got two movies for it.

Dumbledore's gay lover walks into a room and Dumbledore says: Is that a wand in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?

Then Dumbledore's gay lover takes out the wand.

Dumbledore: Wow, that's bigger than Harry's.

Dumbledore's gay lover then says:  Well that's a kid's wand, this right here is a MAN's wand!  It's a mighty big and I like it cause hard all the time, can't break.  Also, after shooting my magic load it can recharge in less than a minute and it's ready to go again.

Dumbledore:  Amazing.  That's the thickest wand I've ever seen.  Can I touch it?

ddiaz, I agree with you 100%. I've read that book 3 times in the last few months. It's a great book with a lot of stuff to get through for a movie. I was very glad when I heard they were making 2 movies out of it. I could care less about the money WB wants to make off of it as long as the story is told the way it's supposed to be. There are so many scenes they have to do right, leaving 4 Privet, Malfoy Manor, Godric's Hollow, the end battle to name a few, they need the time to do it. While I wasn't terribly impressed with the ending of HBP keeping out the funeral scene, they did a good job of leading into the DH with the 3 in the Astronomy Tower. I left feeling satisfied.

Oh c'mon everyone's going to see it!  They're good movies that are loyal to the books to the best of their ability.  They make a ton of cash and they're entertaining.  What more do you want?