Movie News

17 Comments | Add

 

Rate & Share:

0
 

Related Links:

 

Info:

Update: Director Rumor Debunked for 28 MONTHS LATER

Danny Boyle still the leading candidate after all.

By Jarrod Sarafin     October 08, 2008
Source: Arrow in the Head


Survivors trying to make it out of London alive in 28 WEEKS LATER(2007).
© Fox Atomic

Update: It seems that the rumor of 28 Months Later grabbing a director may not be true, Maniacs. Twitchfilm posted an update on the latest speculation by saying they received a very brief note from insiders within the third installment stating that the Paul Andrew Williams rumor is "totally untrue".

For now, no director is attached and the only speculation we have to go by is original director Danny Boyle hinting to the press back when 28 Weeks Later hit theaters that he could return behind the camera for the third film.

 

Original: It's amazing what you'll hear at various film festivals around the world. Sometimes those whispers you hear from insiders may even end up true. If the latter is the case here, not only do we have a 28 Months Later coming into production shortly, we also have a director already attached to lens the project. Arrow in the Head was on hand at the Sitges Film Festival this weekend and grabbed this interesting piece of knowledge.

Now I kind of knew about that already but mention it here for those who may not know. The scoop I caught was that a director has been chosen for this second installment. Who? PAUL ANDREW WILLIAMS baby! The UK director of THE COTTAGE (Read our review of it here). So there you have it! The 28 MONTHS LATER wheels are in motion! Arrow out!

The Cottage turned a few heads this year and 28 Days Later creator-executive producer Danny Boyle may have been one of them. There have been whispers that we could see a third installment in the franchise ever since 28 Weeks Later hit theaters May 11, 2007. Before that release even. The second film wasn't exactly a box office juggernaut, having pulled in only $64.2 million worldwide but there is no telling how much money it made from its DVD run later that year. The budget was likely very low as well. The first film was produced for only $8 million and wound up grossing $82.7 million worldwide in 2003.

MOVIES REVIEWS

Comments (0) | Bangs (0)
MOVIE REVIEW- THE UNBORN
Comments (8) | Bangs (0)
MANIA INTERVIEW & REVIEW:...
Comments (8) | Bangs (0)
MOVIE REVIEW- Valkyrie
Comments (6) | Bangs (1)
DVD REVIEW- Death Race
Comments (3) | Bangs (0)
MOVIE REVIEW #2- THE SPIRIT
Comments (6) | Bangs (0)
MOVIE REVIEW #1- THE SPIRIT
Comments (12) | Bangs (1)
MOVIE REVIEW- The Day the Earth...
Comments (16) | Bangs (0)
PUNISHER: WAR ZONE - The Mania...
Comments (5) | Bangs (1)
Review: WANTED on DVD
Comments (10) | Bangs (0)
MOVIE REVIEW- TRANSPORTER 3

COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

Showing items 1 - 10 of 17
1 2 >  >>  
myklspader 10/5/2008 6:15:03 AM
Funny, cause Danny Boyle said in an interview he was going to come back and helm this one cause the last wasn't possible since he was doing “Sunshineâ€. Regardless, I think another installment is welcomed the previous two have been enjoyable.
needaname04 10/5/2008 8:16:19 AM
Agreed. I would be there for a new one. Obviously the first one was the better of the two and if the third one focused more on character rather than explosions like the second it should be great. Danny Boyle should do whatever it takes to direct this one.
hanso 10/5/2008 8:26:25 AM
I can't wait for 28 Years Later.
blackshogun420ninja 10/5/2008 10:18:28 AM
Damn! I still ain't seen 28 weeks. Luved dayz. Weeks just looked kinda soft. But, I guess I should see it be4 months and years come out.
ThrillerSam 10/5/2008 11:36:26 AM
Or 28 decades later... me and some of my employees were joking about how far this could go... 28 generations later... centuries... and so on.
Moz72 10/5/2008 12:27:52 PM
Or..if you want to do an off world story, you could call it 28 Planets Later!
snallygaster 10/5/2008 12:39:20 PM
Loved the first movie, the second was just OK IMO. I could go for a trilogy.
blackshogun420ninja 10/5/2008 12:47:25 PM
...don't 4get 28 shitty movies Later. I just got tha Elm Street box set and they were talkin bout how sequels began2 get silly and fall victim 2 makin fun of themselves. If they really make it2 28 decades...which those money hungry Hollywood hookas might end up doin, it would end up hilarious2 tha audience. 280 years after tha outbreak? Nobody should be left.and, they'd try2 make it look futuristic and well as apocolyptic. That's why Resident Evil3 kinda pissed me off.
316mio 10/5/2008 1:42:07 PM
I liked 28 weeks later. You're funny hanso....28 years later. hehe.
galaga51 10/5/2008 2:29:52 PM
I'm all about 28 Eras Later, but let's get to months first.
1 2 >  >>