Movie Profile


Directors Who Matter Michael Bay

By: ANTHONY C. FERRANTE
Date: Sunday, December 18, 2005

Age: 40

Most Recent Film: The Island

Best Film: Pearl Harbor

Most Underrated Film: The Rock

Did You Know: Won the Gold Lion for The Best Beer Campaign (Miller Lite) at Cannes.

Why He Matters: With James Cameron busy with his documentaries and enjoying all the money he made off of Titanic, Michael Bay is now the go-to-guy for big summer event movies.

"I shoot a lot of film," admits Bay. "Most directors get 20 set-ups a day. A lot of times I'll get 70. I also do a lot of improv, and I'll add funny stuff that wasn't in the script and add action all over the place. I make shit up. Every single movie, some of the stuff I made up is some of the stuff people remember the best, and it comes from working with the actors when you start building characters."

The Island was a bit of departure for Bay in that it had more science-fiction overtones than his previous action flicks Bad Boys, The Rock and Armageddon. It was also a movie that had a lot to say about current society focusing on two clones (Ewan McGregor, Scarlett Johansson) who realize their reason for existing is to simply be harvested for their body parts for their non-clone human counterparts. Naturally, they escape and go on the run where things crash and blow-up in an impressive widescreen spectacle.


"It's a big movie," says Bay. "There's a scope here. It has sci-fi elements, but it also has some unsettling parts about it. And on a human level, it's creepy. You see the birth of these adult-sized clones. It makes you feel sad, as well. And visually, it's really cool."

Technology has changed drastically since Bay first started out. He's shocked that movies can now be made with video cameras and edited on laptops for a fraction of the money it used to cost film students when they had to beg, borrow and steal Super 8 and 16mm equipment.

"It's amazing what you have access to as a film student now," says Bay. "If I had the tools to cut on an Apple instead of working night jobs to be able to rent a moviola -- just think having it on a tiny little computer and how much it frees you up. You used to be a prisoner as a film student getting those tools, and now you actually make something on a little video camera and you can make it damn good."

While technology has been a boon to the industry, Bay still admits he likes doing many things the old-fashioned way. He's still a big proponent of shooting on film, and he also likes to shoot as many elements practical and on-set, enhancing them later, as opposed to creating everything completely in the computer.

"I think you can never underestimate reality," says Bay. "I like supplementing reality and adding to it. The amazing thing about Pearl Harbor most of that is real and then there's stuff that is added -- and lot of people think it was the other way around. On The Island, we (had) 200 effects shots. So my motto as a director is to show big bang shots and spend more money on that, rather than doing a bunch of dinky little ones."

Getting his start as a commercial and music video director, Bay's first inkling that he might want to be a director goes back to when he was a kid working at Lucasfilm and archiving the storyboards on such little films as Empire Strikes Back and Raiders of the Lost Ark.

"I remember filing every storyboard on Raiders and told all my 15-year-old friends that Spielberg is making this movie and that it's going to suck," says Bay. "And I had read it like a comic book, the entire movie, and I vividly remember going to Grauman's Chinese [Theater] and seeing it and going, 'Oh my God, I want to do this.' That's about as vivid as it gets for me."

"As a kid, these guys were my heroes, and now Spielberg talks to me and comes to my office it's weird," admits Bay. Even better, Spielberg plans on producing Bay's next film, Transformers, next year.

"It's the first movie he's produced in ten years," concludes Bay. "He asked me to do it. He said, "I want to be your Jerry Bruckheimer'."


More Content By ANTHONY C. FERRANTE
Last Minute Holiday Shopping Guide: Part 2
(Tuesday, December 19, 2006)
Last Minute Holiday Shopping Guide: Part 1
(Monday, December 18, 2006)
Directors Who Matter - George A. Romero
(Sunday, January 29, 2006)
Directors Who Matter Robert Rodriguez
(Friday, January 20, 2006)
Directors Who Matter - Christopher Nolan
(Friday, January 13, 2006)
Directors Who Matter - Wes Craven
(Sunday, January 8, 2006)
Directors Who Matter - Tim Burton
(Sunday, January 1, 2006)
Directors Who Matter Steven Spielberg
(Friday, December 23, 2005)
Directors Who Matter Michael Bay
(Sunday, December 18, 2005)
Peter Jackson KING KONG
(Sunday, December 18, 2005)
Comments/Responses
1 2 > >>
• Dec 18, 2005, 04:19pm •
I don't understand. It's not April 1st. Why is this article here?

• Dec 18, 2005, 05:44pm •
yeah, the article should say directors who want to ruin classics such as the crappy job he did on The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, he should be thanking Jerry Bruickheimer for his career.

• Dec 19, 2005, 12:57am •
Don't get me wrong here. I despise Michael Bay as much as the next intelligent person, but I can see how he is considered a "Director who matters." He is basically the current Hollywood model, and it works everytime for him, except the Island (maybe people are coming around?)

What confused me more than anything was the choice of Pearl Harbor as his best movie. If it weren't his worst movie, by far, I might see how they could make the argument.

Maybe it's just me, but just about everyone I know thinks that The Rock is his best movie. It just doesn't seem all that underrated to me.

• Dec 19, 2005, 03:55am •
Okay, Lucas could be contested for admiration, but this is a fucking no brainer. The man makes TERRIBLE movies. His action movies are missing a cohesive plot, and as proved by his commentary on the Criterion Collection version of Armageddon, he has NO IDEA what's going on in his movies. This would be forgivable if his action sequences were good, but I don't even remember any, except when the guy got that green ball shoved in his mouth and got a sock to the jaw. When it comes to John Woo, I remember a slug shotgun blowing away flying motorcycles, or kicking a table to get a gun off it, or Nicholas Cage's backflip to a shooting position in Face/Off... Bay has done nothing truly memorable. CINESCAPE... DO A DIRECTOR THAT REALLY MATTERS LIKE CRONENBERG, GODARD, KUROSAWA, KUBRICK, EVEN SPIELBERG, BUT ENOUGH OF THIS MICKEY MOUSE BULLSHIT!!!

• Dec 19, 2005, 05:35am •
"With James Cameron busy with his documentaries and enjoying all the money he made off of Titanic, Michael Bay is now the go-to-guy for big summer event movies."

It's clear from this passage that the series of articles should be entitled "Directors that matter to the studio's bottom line." or "Directors that matter given the erroneous maxim: $=Quality".

• Dec 19, 2005, 10:48am •
''Okay, Lucas could be contested for admiration, but this is a fucking no brainer. The man makes TERRIBLE movies''

Well Bryanway, I wouldn't say the man makes terrible movies, on the contrairy, he did made some fun movies to watch and he's the guy who gives ''summer movie'' the perfect definition (summer movie = lots of things blowing up, lots of half naked women on screen, not too complicated storylines). He's not a director who likes to bring perfect images with perfect acting and all that, he's a director who likes to blow shit up and to show you things that don't make sense but that are fun to watch.

The Rock was his best movie and it was fun to watch. Armageddon was awful acting but, the explosions and action scenes were cool to see (even if there was so many mystakes in that movie). Pearl harbor was his worst movie since he tried to put some ''story'' in his movie and it was just total crap. BUT, that scene of the actual battle with all the planes and the boats blowing up, that was some of the best action sequence I've seen.

And that's what Micheal Bay is good about, some cool images that don't make sense but are still fun to watch. There is no way in hell that M.B. is in the same league as Cronemberg, Spielberg or Jackson because they don't have the same style at all but, M.B has a good style that does go well in the likes of John Woo, Brian De Palma, Paul W.S. Anderson, Uwe Bowl and all of them action directors.

• Dec 19, 2005, 01:32pm •
I think Kyle from South Park summed it up best:

“… and Michael Bay gets to keep making movies. There isn’t a God.”

How can anyone say Michael Bay ‘matters’ in any real sense? Twenty years from now will anyone be talking about his movies the way we talk about The Godfather, Star Wars, Psycho or Citizen Kane? No.

Michael Bay does decent popcorn thrillers that are entertaining for a couple of hours and are largely forgotten the next day. He’s a strictly by the numbers director. He puts together ok action pieces with big booms. He adds nothing to the art of movie making. Quick someone tell me something innovative he’s done. Has he pushed the technology of filmmaking like Lucas? How about visual imagery like Spielberg? Editing and pacing like Hitchcock? Lighting and set design like Wells? No.

As a couple of other people have noted, Lucas was debatable (his artistic vs. technical achievements). But Michael Bay is not important beyond box office numbers which are fleeting at best (quick name the highest grossing movies of 1963, 1974, 1985, 1995 and 2002). And his box office success owes much, if not more, to the marketing department’s ad campaigns and Bruckheimer’s ability to get name actors for his movies and toss large wads of cash his way.

There are a number of excellent directors working today that ‘matter’ far more than Michael Bay. Many of which others have named.


• Dec 19, 2005, 01:43pm •
Okay, when I first saw this article posted here, I immediately thought of the song from "Team America." You know the one I'm talking about!

• Dec 19, 2005, 03:53pm •
I'm going to contest, again, that he does matter. This is not a directors that are great (or even good) column. This is directors that make an impact on the film industry. Right now Hollywood is living by the Michael Bay model. It's unfortunate, but he does matter whether you want him to or not.

• Dec 19, 2005, 04:28pm •
JediBanner, Brian DePalma is crap because he treats his movies like film experiments with split screen, diopters, the camera spinning in circles... he never should have left film school, if he even went. John Woo is on a class in his own because he seamlessly blends action and melodrama, and his sequences are so highly stylized and his editing is so fierce that it's almost hard to image action movies before him.

Film works very much the same way that all other art forms do, and the philosophy is simple: if you have nothing to add to the art form, then you are not an artist. Bay uses the same styles of other directors and makes films that fall in with other summer entertainment, hence, he does not matter. Besides, he works for Jerry Bruckheimer almost exclusively, and if it weren't for him, Bay wouldn't be a household name. Bruckheimer won't let a director do anything that he doesn't want, which is why he's so powerful.

Besides, think about Bay's movies. The scripts he chooses are Armageddon, which came after Deep Impact, Pearl Harbor, which came after Saving Private Ryan and Titanic, Texas Chainsaw Massacre, which is a remake, and The Island, which has been in legal limbo because of its similarities to Clonus, and it clearly lends itself comparisons to Logan's Run.

I don't mind when a populist director emerges or is honored, that's why I argue that George Lucas is a director that matters for adding new elements to the form, but Bay brings nothing to the table we haven't seen before, which means he does not deserve to be honored.

1 2 > >>
Login to post a comment!