Movie Profile

Send to a Friend



To: (email)


To: (name)


From: (name)


Message:



Directors Who Matter - Tim Burton

By: ANTHONY C. FERRANTE
Date: Sunday, January 01, 2006

Age: 47

Most Recent Film: Charlie and the Chocolate Factory

Best Film: Edward Scissorhands

Most Underrated Film: Big Fish

Did You Know: Designed winning anti-litter poster for a garbage company when he was in ninth grade, and all the company's trucks sported his poster for a year.

Why He Matters: If anyone was a true artiste, it would be Burton, whose warped and idiosyncratic world-eye view has continually been brought to very successful big-budget mainstream studio fare like Batman and Sleepy Hollow.

When you heard that director Tim Burton was re-imagining Roald Dahl's famous children's book Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, it's one of the few times you didn't hear a groan echoing throughout the global collective consciousness at another beloved classic being remade. After all, Charlie is the type of movie (like Sleepy Hollow) where you recognize Burton was born to make it.

"I remember growing up and the book having a lot of impact on me," says Burton. "There weren't many authors in my mind that captured that feeling of light and dark that spoke to children and adults at the same time, even though it's a bit more commonplace now."

While many view the 1971 Gene Wilder film Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory as a classic, Burton didn't want to compete with the earlier film and was more interested in adapting the Dahl book more faithfully.

"I wanted to keep it true to the book and things that were in there," says Burton. "It's a strong book."

The process for bringing Charlie to the big screen was a long one. Various directors and writers had been on board over the years, and everyone from Jim Carrey to Will Ferrell were considered for the role of Willy Wonka.

"The tact we took was to go back to the book," says Burton. "If not, then why make this to begin with?"

But he admits some of the early scripts did go a bit astray.

"They were originally trying to make Charlie more proactive, or this and that," recalls Burton. "The kids are so clearly bad, and part of the whole thing about Charlie is he represents 90 percent of the kids we knew in school -- people you don't recognize that were just quiet and maybe good, but not overly demonstrative. I think the key was to keep it simple that way and not really make him some sort of super boy or anything."


Not surprising, Burton mainstay Johnny Depp played Wonka in the new film, and he was even more eccentric than the more outgoing Wilder in the original film. Charlie, as a film, was also be a bit darker as well.

"I grew up watching monster movies and never had problems with them," says Burton. "Fairy tales have been around for centuries and have explored darker aspects of things without any real problems. I think certain adults forget what it's like to be a kid and become more politically correct. They're afraid of the things they forget they were kind of into when they were younger. I read early manuscripts that Raold Dahl had wrote for Charlie, and he had characters called Herpes and other weird things. He kind of pulled himself back a little, but some kids can take certain things and some kids can't. A lot of times adults freak them out and make them think something is wrong with it, and it isn't."

While many filmmakers might have gone an overly CGI-route for the film, Burton says he still believes in keeping things as practical as possible.

"We tried to keep CGI to a minimum," says Burton. "It really isn't an action movie and with kids and all we tried to build as many sets and tried not to rely on blue screen that much. It gives everything a real texture, and I think it helped everybody the kids especially when things were on the set. If you rely on something like CGI too much, you get in this black hole. There's something fun about the original old-fashioned way of making a movie that you really don't want to lose. That's one of the main reasons you're doing it. It's always a balance."

Getting his start in the business as an animator at Disney, followed by a couple oddball shorts, Burton made his feature debut with 1985's Pee-Wee's Big Adventure and followed it with the quirky afterlife comedy Beetlejuice before spearheading the big screen adaptation of Batman in 1989. Through it all he's continued to maintain his filmmaking identity, even when he makes the occasional misstep like Planet of the Apes.

"I've felt lucky for the most part because I've been able to do what I wanted to do," says Burton. "I've always had a certain amount of freedom and a certain amount of restrictions, but that's the nature of filmmaking. No matter where you get money from, you have your restrictions. It's just trying to find that balance all the time."

Then again for Burton, he doesn't feel he would have been as successful if he did it any other way.

"When people ask me advice, I think the best thing I remember is to keep true to yourself and try to do the things you want to do," says Burton. "I always thought it was a mistake when people would go outside of themselves to do something. The only thing you can do is go by your own passion and do what you want to do and hope somebody will go for it."


More Content By ANTHONY C. FERRANTE
Last Minute Holiday Shopping Guide: Part 2
(Tuesday, December 19, 2006)
Last Minute Holiday Shopping Guide: Part 1
(Monday, December 18, 2006)
Directors Who Matter - George A. Romero
(Sunday, January 29, 2006)
Directors Who Matter Robert Rodriguez
(Friday, January 20, 2006)
Directors Who Matter - Christopher Nolan
(Friday, January 13, 2006)
Directors Who Matter - Wes Craven
(Sunday, January 8, 2006)
Directors Who Matter - Tim Burton
(Sunday, January 1, 2006)
Directors Who Matter Steven Spielberg
(Friday, December 23, 2005)
Directors Who Matter Michael Bay
(Sunday, December 18, 2005)
Peter Jackson KING KONG
(Sunday, December 18, 2005)
Fandango Logo
Comments/Responses
1 2 > >>
• Jan 01, 2006, 02:46pm •
Finally! A director who really DOES matter in the Directors Who Matter column. Burton is an original filmmaker, someone who has a very unique identity and vision. His films--even the ones that aren't critically or financially well-recieved--have an impact on the industry because he stretches the imagination and brings his audience into a world that they usually do not experience at any other time. We have been blessed that 2005 brought us two Tim Burton films. Let's hope for many, many more.

• Jan 01, 2006, 04:35pm •
He does indeed matter.

But let's not forget 'Planet Of The Apes'. I don't care what anyone says about 'Charlie And The Chocolate Factory'... not closer to the book. If you disagree, look at the credits for the original and tell me who wrote the screenplay. You can't get any closer to the original vision than that.

He does matter though, and that's important... but don't forget the Spielberg article, because he matters too.

• Jan 01, 2006, 10:41pm •
Tim Burton still has that knack of showing FASCINATION with the movies he makes. It's something that alot of Directors miss. From Ed Wood to Big Fish, you can feel that odd bewilderment from the things he makes. Even HE doesn't know sometimes what it is he's done, but everytime there is one thing that's certain: You get something entertaining. Best Film: Batman. Michael Keaton was not supposed to be able to pull that acting job off, but it was BRILLIANT! And Jack as the Joker? Really? Then you watch it and BOOM! JACK IS THE JOKER!!! Most Underrated film: BIG FISH. The story about stories in the story of a man. There you have it.

• Jan 02, 2006, 12:13am •
I have never had a problem with Tim Burton. His films are dark and briliant at the same time. The tone and mood of his films are suductive and bring something totally different to the screen. I think the first film I ever saw of his was Beetlejuice. I would love a sequel to that.

• Jan 02, 2006, 12:07pm •
Burton has such an amazingly unique vision for his films. You know they're his films even if you didn't see his name on the screen. Beetlejuice was so odd, but I couldn't take my eyes off of the screen. Sleepy Hollow was outstanding for its look, mood and performances and still a favorite of mine. Big Fish was a wonderfully sentimental fairy tale and the fable Edward Scissorhands is such a brilliant film because its tale of acceptance and racist views doesn't slap you in face with it's message. And, of course there's Batman. Buron's take on the dark knight was terrific and his casting of the leads was inspired (although Kim Basinger wasn't much of an actress at that point-but she did look great!). Add Burton's visionary direction to Danny Elfman's dark scores (does anyone even remember any of the horrible Prince music from Batman? Maybe a couple of people, but we all remember the theme and the score) and Depp's performances and you've got a great foundation for a film.

• Jan 02, 2006, 01:53pm •
I am in love with The Nightmare Before Christmas. The way I see it, you can love Burton or hate him, but you can't ignore him. His style is strictly his own, and ever since Vincent, if he releases a film, I'm immediately interested in it. There are very few directors I can say that about.

• Jan 02, 2006, 06:02pm •
Big Fish is phenomenal. Definitely one of my top movies of 2003.

• Jan 02, 2006, 08:59pm •
Interesting storyteller (at times), good production designer, an okay director. I confess, I haven't watched anything of his after the megabomb that was "Planet of the Apes", but can you blame me after "Mars Attacks" and "Sleepy Hollow" before it?

"Ed Wood" and "Pee Wee's Big Adventure" are the only two movies that I really like from his resume as a director (he didn't direct "A Nightmare Before Christmas", Henry Selick did). As for the Batman movies...I think Joss Whedon said it best in a recent interview when he was talking about "Batman Begins" (paraphrasing) '...they finally made a good movie after making four bad ones.'

Burton has a different vision that works well in storytelling and production (like set design, character design, etc.), but just like Tarantino, he needs supervision when directing and editing otherwise the end product winds up being a big mess.



• Jan 03, 2006, 08:52am •
I remember Beetlejuice when I was young and how that is such a great movie.

• Jan 03, 2006, 09:03am •
Personally, I find Burton's work extremely uneven. I think he has a very unique vision (something few could argue) but his storytelling powers are seriously lacking. It's like he's more interested in conveying style than substance. He's not completely unfocussed, but clearly he needs to find that careful balance of emotionally involved, moving storytelling with his clever, twisted aesthetics.

Therefore, I'm not entirely convinced that he is a Director who "matters". A director of interest? Sure. But I just can't see how this guy belongs with living luminaries such as Spielberg, Gilliam, Soderbergh, Malick, Yimou, Ang Lee, Wong Kar Wai, Tarantino, Kitano, et al. Let alone those who are gone (Kurosawa, Kubrick, Lean, et al.)

I guess Burton is just one of those guys you either love or feel completely ambivalent about. I'm obviously in the latter!

1 2 > >>
Login to post a comment!