Box Office Report

22 Comments | Add

 

Rate & Share:

1
 

Related Links:

 

Info:

A Disturbed B.O Report

By Jarrod Sarafin     April 15, 2007


Disturbia Image
© N/A

The past month has been a rollercoaster of surprises in our various box office reports. From Wild Hogs performing unbelievably well to 300 making us all looks like fools. From TMNT kicking ninja butt to Blades of Glory accepting the gold twice while Grindhouse stunned industry insiders around the world. So what’s going to happen this weekend? We have 6 new wide releases opening up on this Friday the 13th weekend and now it’s time to find out which ones were successful and which ones are joining Grindhouse in the back of the box office bus? 

Leading the group this weekend is Shia LeBeouf’s thriller Disturbia. Shia has been everywhere as far as movie news is concerned the past few weeks getting selected for the next Indiana Jones. The selection certainly didn’t hurt this film getting more attention. Paramount/Dreamworks distributed Disturbia thrilled audiences grabbing 23 mil in its debut weekend and this time, the number one film worked well off the timing of the release date, Friday the 13th. It has a running time of 1 hour and 44 minutes so it had quite a few showings per theater in its 2,925 screens across the nation. Its budget is listed at 20 mil so it in 3 days, it’s made its money back for Paramount, Dreamworks & producer Steven Spielberg.  

Coming in right behind the thriller is that other Paramount/Dreamworks comedy Blades of Glory. The comedy starring Will Ferrell has ruled the box office for two weeks but moved down a slot to give Disturbia the champ seat this weekend and I’m sure Paramount nor Dreamworks mind at all. During the month of March, Warner Bros ruled the box office with it’s 300 and TMNT releases. This  month is looking like a P/DW month for all the parties involved. Glory tacked on another 14 mil this weekend bringing its total to 90.1 mil overall domestically.  

Landing in 3rd place is the Disney animation Meet the Robinsons with a 12.1 mil take at the box office. The animation has pulled in 72 mil now domestically and another 25 mil overseas so it’s already 3 mil shy of that 100 mil mark overall. Not too shabby for the Mickey Mouse company. 

Right behind in 4th place is the Halle Berry thriller Perfect Stranger. Sony Revolution is taking 4th and 5th places this weekend with its Perfect Stranger & Are We Done Yet releases. Stranger pulled in 11.5 mil in 2,661 screens across the nation and averaged $4,321 per screen. The family comedy, also by Sony Revolution, Are We Done Yet is right behind in 5th place with a 9.2 mil bow in receipts. Ice Cube’s family centered sequel to Are We There Yet has now pulled in 33 mil overall in its 2 weeks of release. Not bad for Cube or for Sony Revolution. 

This is where the box office report goes downhill. 5th place is 9.2 mil but 6th-10th places all come well short of the mark with nothing above 4.8 mil. In its debut weekend, Pathfinder: Legend of the Ghost Warrior pulled in a measly 4.8 mil in it’s wide (yet limited) release of 1,720 screens. The action film distributed by Fox averaged $2,790 per screen. This isn’t exactly a great start to a film, landing in 6th place in its debut weekend with only 4 mil. Not sure why Fox put it only 1,700 screens in its debut weekend. 

Disney’s Wild Hogs is steadily holding place in 7th place for the second weekend in a row. It didn’t budge from its spot and took in 4.6 mil over the three day weekend. The film is starting to get pulled out of theaters now but it’s made 152.2 mil domestically and another 18.4 mil overseas. Disney is already thinking about greenlighted the sequel and for good reason, this film has performed very strong with audiences and with box office longevity.  

Time for the Warner Bros section of the Box Office Report. We’ve already had the P/DW duo and the Sony Revolution team. The two films from Warner Bros are both rated R films. One has done outstanding and now rules this years total box office standings. The other hasn’t had quite the success and might break even or it might not. I’m speaking 300 and The Reaping here. Reaping lands in 8th place with 4.5 million in receipts, just 100 k short of the 7th placed Hogs. The Hillary Swank horror film has pulled in 19.7 overall in its two weeks. 300, on the other hand, has breached that all important 200.0 watermark. The periodic epic by Snyder and Warner Bros has pulled in 200.8 mil in its 6 weeks of release. It’s also made another 175.6 mil overseas bringing its overall total to 376.4 mil. When you consider its budget is 65 mil, the film is not only the top roller in 2007 but also the most profitable.  

Now, it’s time to talk about the opposite of the equation. Weinstein’s Grindhouse lags behind the pack this weekend in 10th place with just 4.2 mil in receipts. I guess it’s something that it even finished in the top 10, right? The film’s failure was just compounded this weekend by staying in the charts enough to warrant talking about and has accumulated 19.7 mil overall in its two weeks of release. Its budget is listed at 67 mil.  
 
 

Rank Movie Weekend $ Screens Average Total $
1 Disturbia 23.0 mil 2,925 $7,871 23.0 mil
2 Blades of Glory 14.0 mil 3,467 $4,056 90.1 mil
3 Meet the Robinsons 12.1 mil 3,238 $3,737 72.0 mil
4 Perfect Stranger 11.5 mil 2,661 $4,321 11.5 mil
5 Are We Done Yet? 9.2 mil 2,877 $3,197 33.0 mil
6 Pathfinder: Legend of the Ghost Warrior 4.8 mil 1,720 $2,790 4.8 mil
7 Wild Hogs 4.6 mil 2,429 $1,909 152.2 mil
8 The Reaping 4.5 mil 2,603 $1,753 19.7 mil
9 300 4.3 mil 2,140 $2,016 200.8 mil
10 Grindhouse 4.2 mil 2,629 $1,612 19.7 mil
 
 
 
 

Perhaps there was absolutely no shot that Grindhouse would have performed well given its competition, its very long running time and its extreme violent driven content from the minds of Rodriquez & Tarantino.  

Yes, perhaps it didn’t have a shot. 

That doesn’t take away the fact of it failing to the degree that it has. Nor does it take away the fact that it is Hollywood version of a Greek Tragedy. This is an extremely sad circumstance of events the past week for me personally speaking but I should keep all my thoughts to myself here. After all, this report is supposed to be about the “facts” and not my opinions on the situation. It’s clear to see what kind of cinema wins when pitted against each other all in the mind numbing game of box office analysis.  

Cinematic progress? Strong vs Weak? Economics vs Ratings? Running time? Amount of screens? Timing of release date? 

I think our residential Maniacal Joker Michael X Maelstrom put it best by weighing these factors against each other attached to last week’s column. After all, if you actually look at the numbers and factor in some number crunching hypothesis, you will come up with an eyebrow raising fact that under the weight of these factors, Grindhouse actually did well. 

That’s the glass half full opinion on the matter.  

The fact is that it has underperformed in a lot of industry insider’s minds because of how much money (or lack thereof) it has made so far in its two weeks of release. With all the hype attached to this film from a massive online and internet presence, people expected it to perform much better then it has but everyone with those high expectations seems to have ignored the factors against it doing well. 

The reason it’s failed.  

Nevermind the highly critical praise or audience reactions to the film, if it doesn’t get a certain amount in the first two weeks of its box office release, it’s going to be considered a failure.  

The whole situation has boggled that number crunching brain of mine. 

Here’s what Grindhouse made the past week: 

April 6: 5.0 mil

April 7: 4.0 mil

April 8: 2.5 mil

April 9: 1.2 mil

April 10: $990,327

April 11: $827,910

April 12: $784,740

Total: 15.4 mil 
 
 

Even when I know and list the reasons why it didn’t have a shot last week on Easter weekend against so many family movies, I find myself in utter shock that it has performed as lowly as it has. It’s all very disappointing to me as a horror minded moviegoer and I know I’m not the only one. Kevin Smith in a recent podcast on his Quickstop Entertainment website echoed my thoughts completely in the disbelief that this film has performed so low against all the happy family comedies out today. As I say, we know why it’s failed but it doesn’t stop the disappointment from rearing its head through in the words I type here. It does seem a little sad as a person who loves the horror genre and the cheesy goodness of yesteryear from some of my favorite cult classic directors. It’s sad to see these horror genre specific films fall as they have been pitted against the whole family comedy film genre.  

Perhaps, Grindhouse would have had a better opening this week on Friday the 13th. Perhaps not. It’s running time contributing to only getting 3 showings a day and its amount of screens across the nation would still have it struggling to make any money as to appear successful in industry circles everywhere. Would it have done as well as Disturbia did this weekend with these kind of factors against it? Who knows?  

The questionable decisions by studio execs continue in my eyes even today as I sit here and write this. Next week, Hot Fuzz is being released on only 700 screens. Yes, that’s right reader. 700 screens. I’m not sure exactly what Rogue’s rationale is here but last time I checked, Shaun of the Dead was a critical success! Hot Fuzz has been advertised and the anticipation is very high for this film so why release it on 700 screens? This kind of decision is as mind boggling as Weinstein releasing Grindhouse on only 2,600 screens against family comedies in 3,400 screens. It’s as mind numbingly strange as Dimension releasing Halloween at the end of August. Yes, the end of August.  

Does any of this studio executive logic make any sense to you? How come we who analyize the industry here seem to have a better grasp then the executive who makes the decision to release their films with these types of handicaps? It really doesn’t make a lot of sense to me and I’m always curious on some of these judgement calls from the individuals whom are supposed to know better. People whom are supposed to be experts. Some of these questionable decisions on their parts continue to baffle the hell out of me.  

Whatever the case, here’s what you Maniacs had to say on Grindhouse under-performing last weekend. 
 
 

Maniac Feedback: 

Michaelxaviermaelstrom: I doubt Hollywood accountants are going to miss the math here, all things equal: Grindhouse is the #1 movie this weekend. 
 
Let's do the math. 
 
(are you sitting comfortably? good then we'll begin - Ed) 
 
Go Away Ed. 
 
Hunh-Hunh-Hem. 
 
*tug down on purple shirt* 
 
Grindhouse (2624 screens)  
 
Blades of Glory's (3410 screens) 
 
Grindhouse opened on 786 -less- screens than Blades of Glory. 
 
so let's add those 786 screens for equitable comparison. 
 
Grindhouse average take ($4417 per screen) times 786 = $3,471762 
 
That brings Grindhouse's boxoffice up to  
 
11.5 million + 3.47 million = 14.97 million. 
 
(had Grindhouse simply opened on the same number of screens as BoG -Ed) 
 
but the accountants aren't done yet.  
 
Being a double-feature with a running time of over 3 hours Grindhouse can only play HALF as many times (ergo sell half as many tickets) as BoG per day. 
 
So let's factor in an equitable comparison there too now: 
 
14.97 million x 2 = *29.94 million. 
 
*if you agree that Grindhouse is only able to play half as many times as BoG per day. 
 
**if instead you estimate that Grindhouse is able to play closer to 2/3rds as many times as BoG, then. 
 
2/3 x 14.97 million = 9.98 million 
 
14.97 + 9.98 = **24.95 million  
 
Now look at the weekend charts: 
 
#1: Blades of Glory 23 million 
 
#2: Meet the Robinson's 17 million. 
 
#3: Are We Done Yet 15 million. 
 
On an even playing field - opening on the -same- number of screens and running the -same- number of times per day as Blades of Glory, (..assuming averages remain constant.. -Ed) 
 
Grindhouse opens with either 29.94 million (high estimate) or 24.95 million (low estimate) and _either way_: 
 
Grindhouse takes 1st place at the Box Office this weekend. 
 
(All things being equal - Ed)”
 

Wessmith1966: “Saw Grindhouse and The Reaping over the weekend. Although I enjoyed Hillary's performance, I thought The Reaping was somewhat flat, easy to figure out the big reveal during the climax and actually pretty boring. I was disappointed. The special effects were pretty good.  
 
Grindhouse was just pure fun, and I saw it during a late night showing with the perfect audience. Planet Terror was absolutely fantastic, but I thought Deathproof was fairly uninspired and even a little boring. Kurt Russell was good as Stuntman Mike and I thought Zoe Bell was a kick, but other than that I wasn't impressed. I liked the trailers, although Zombie's was just ok for me. Rose McGowan was smoking in the movies. wow! 
 
I did notice that my theater only had three showings of Grindhouse per day, while other films were being shown five or six times.”
 

Merin: The theater I can go to here in central Wisconsin shows Grindhouse 3 times a day. Other films, like Blades of Glory and Meet the Robinsons, are 5 times a day. That's two extra shows a day. That makes a huge difference monetarily, even without sell-out crowds. Less options on when to catch it, less likelihood of waiting till the next showing if you missed your time you tried to make. 
 
Being 3+ hours (both IMDB and Wikipedia list it as 191 minutes, and the theater I went to listed it as 3 hours and 15 minutes) also means you lose audience - there are many people who do not like sitting in a theater so long. They'll watch it on DVD, surely, because they can pause or watch it over several viewings. And with such a long running time it's harder to get excited about going to it again. I loved it, but I think I'll wait (anxiously) for the DVD cause that was a long haul in that seat. 
 
I agree with Jarrod. The reports are remarkably short-sighted
 

Snallgaster: As usual, Jarrod's analysis is spot-on.  
 
I'm part of the Grindhouse target market. I'm a fan of both directors, and I'm an avid movie goer (generally seeing one movie in the theater every week). However, I did not see Grindhouse this weekend, even though I really wanted to. Fact is, my family celebrates Easter with a get-together, so Sunday was completely out of the question for seeing any movie in the theater. Furthermore, even though Easter is a holiday for me, my employer doesn't recognize it by granting a three-day weekend. So unlike say Christmas or Thanksgiving, which also involve family get-togethers, there's no extra day for this holiday weekend. So I wind up having to get all my weekend chores and errands done on Saturday, leaving very little time for a movie.  
 
Which brings me to that daunting running time. There was no way I could fit that three hours into my Saturday schedule this weekend. I could have squeaked in a 90-minute movie, but not a three hour movie. I have a buddy (also squarely in the target audience for Grindhouse and avid theater-goer) who outright told me he will not sit through Grindhouse if it were three hours long.  
 
I believe the Weinsteins really botched the scheduling of the movie. One weekend before or one weekend after, and I would have been there opening weekend. I suspect my situation was experienced by a number of other potential first-weekend viewers. I mean, between the running time and the R-rating, why further handicap the movie by releasing it on Easter weekend?”
 

Jppintar326: I agree that Grindhouse should have opened one weekend or one weekend after Easter. I think there is also a certain polarization when it comes to Quentin Tarantino movies. According to USA Today, Grindhouse did well on both coasts but not in the middle of the country or the South. I know Tarantino has a lot of fans, but I think there are just as many (myself included) who thinks he's an overrated one hit wonder. It looks to me like die hard Tarantino fans came but others stayed away. These die hard Tarantino fans are probably young, urban, and probably liberal when it comes to their taste in violence, which is why you get the disparity in where the movie did well and where it didn't.” 

Jon41380: I think it speaks volumes about the movie going public when Blades Of Glory beats out a Tarantino film. It's pretty sad. I'm going to check out Grindhouse today. The film is three hours and eleven minutes. Each film is an hour and a half plus the fake trailers in between. I guess expecting the audience to make a three hour commitment is the problem. In an interview with Weinstein, he said that the movie performed well on the east and west coast but didn't in the midwest and south. I live in SF and everyone really like it (except for the SF Chronicle but who cares what they think). I talked to some people in TX (where I'm originally from) and a lot of people didn't even know what it was. It seems like maybe the marketing wasn't done properly. Just my thoughts though. This movie will make it's money. Word of mouth will spread and after going international it shouldn't be a problem. After all, the budget for the whole project was only 53 mil. Despite what you think about Rodriguez, this is how he keeps working. He stays ahead of schedule and under budget.” 

Gamera23: I've heard that GRINDHOUSE is playing in about 2600 theaters, but multiplexes added it to an extra 1000 screens. However, I'll still agree with Jarrod. With double the running time, the extra screensdon't make up for fewer possible screenings. GRINDHOUSE was still shown fewer times last weekend than REAPING, which cost more to make, and still beat it in raw dollars. With no new family films coming on Friday, and the others aging, GRINDHOUSE should make a bigger dent. Unless PATHFINDER is something remarkable.” 
 
 

All good thoughts everyone! Keep up the great feedback. The knowledge of our box office maniacs is easy to see with every week’s new report. Keep up that amazing feedback. 
 

April 20, 2007 Releases: 

Wide Releases

Fracture (2,400 screens)

Vacancy (2,200 screens)

In the Land of Women (2,000+ screens)

Hot Fuzz (700 screens) 

Limited Releases

Severance

Smiley Face

Stephanie Daley

The Tripper (50 screens)

The Valet (6 screens)

Downtown: A Street Tale 
 

That’s going to do it for this week’s edition of the Mania Box Office Report. Talk to you later, Maniacs.

MOVIES REVIEWS

Comments (0) | Bangs (0)
MOVIE REVIEW- THE UNBORN
Comments (8) | Bangs (0)
MANIA INTERVIEW & REVIEW:...
Comments (8) | Bangs (0)
MOVIE REVIEW- Valkyrie
Comments (6) | Bangs (1)
DVD REVIEW- Death Race
Comments (3) | Bangs (0)
MOVIE REVIEW #2- THE SPIRIT
Comments (6) | Bangs (0)
MOVIE REVIEW #1- THE SPIRIT
Comments (12) | Bangs (1)
MOVIE REVIEW- The Day the Earth...
Comments (16) | Bangs (0)
PUNISHER: WAR ZONE - The Mania...
Comments (5) | Bangs (1)
Review: WANTED on DVD
Comments (10) | Bangs (0)
MOVIE REVIEW- TRANSPORTER 3

COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

Showing items 1 - 10 of 22
1 2 3 >  >>  
kempmike79 4/15/2007 4:11:58 PM
Disappointed to see Hot Fuzz is only opening on 700 screens. It opened in the UK a wee while ago and it was absolutely packed out. It's a great film although it is very British so may not translate that well. It does for action buddy films what Shaun of the Dead did for zombie films - highly recommended if you liked Shaun.
Captmathman 4/15/2007 4:38:21 PM
I'm still thinking Grindhouse will be considered a long-term success, even though it didn't make BO bank. DVD sales will do very well.
Merin 4/15/2007 5:10:16 PM
Box office, to me, means very little. But then I'm not an accountant nor an investor, so my caring more about viewer reviews and (to a much lesser extent) critic reviews, and especially my own opinion on the film, is obviously biased. Only 700 screens for Hot Fuzz? Am I going to have to drive to Chicago to see this film? I'm very unhappy with that. Maybe I'll get lucky and a college town will grab it nearby.
wessmith1966 4/15/2007 5:34:54 PM
Perfect Stranger was as flat a thriller as I've seen in a long time. The director must be in love with Halle, because he sure showed her curves as much as possible. The ending was a little bit of a twist, but not enough to warrant buying two tickets IMO. I loved Pathfinder. The visuals were fantastic; the whole film looked like a Frank Frazetta painting. I am really disappointed that Grindhouse has tanked. I thought it would bounce back this weekend since there was no family holiday to compete with. I saw the Rocky Horror Picture Show for the first time since '89 at the Allen Theater in Annville, PA, Friday night at midnight. It was so much fun, although we weren't allowed to take all of the "props" into the theater. It was great to see a younger generation get into the film and dance to Time Warp.
jppintar326 4/15/2007 6:17:33 PM
Enough about Grindhouse. If I had a nickel for every movie that I liked that died at the box office, I would be a rich man. I am a little surprised that Disturbia was number one. I guess people like thrillers like this.
almostunbiased 4/15/2007 6:28:20 PM
Really cause even if I had a dime for every movie I liked that tanked at the box office, I'd probably still have less than 10 bucks. But maybe that is rich to you pintar. Putting that aside, I agree with Merin although lets' be honest money is what makes the world go round. Or is that Inertia, I always get those confused. I personally thought Grindhouse looked like a rental, and I'm sure I will when it comes. Now Pathfinder I wanted to see, but I just don't get to the movie theater as much as I used to. I'll rent that too.
peteo 4/15/2007 7:03:10 PM
I finally saw "300" today, since previous sold-outs and circumstances (e.g. Easter) have kept me from seeing it, and what a perfect digital IMAX movie! Have to watch it again on a regular screen for comparison. I was surprised how well Disturbia did, let alone being in the top spot. SLB did pretty well on SNL last night, considering the crappy skits he had to endure. :)
snallygaster 4/15/2007 9:08:19 PM
I'll agree with Merin's comment in as much that the amount of box office a movie makes has no impact on how what I think of it. However, as a one-time student of marketing and a movie fan, the box office report has always interested me, whether making predictions on how much a movie will make or doing Monday morning quarterbacking to analyze what went right or wrong with a movie's box office performance. Case in point: I just got back from watching Grindhouse. Absolutely loved it. But it is clearly tanking at the box office. It dropped 63% from last weekend, which is the sort of really precipitous drop one only expects from particularly lame horror movies (this is an almost identical second weekend drop to The Grudge 2, for instance). Part of the fascination with the box office failure of Grindhouse is that it's not just another box office dud - it was a big gamble for the Weinsteins, so everybody was watching. The fact that they have commented about re-releasing the movies as seperate entities probably didn't instill confidence in the movie-going public. They've already sunk about $100M between the production and marketing, if they split the movies and re-release them, this will incur even more expenses with no guarantee that the two movies will be a draw individually. If they follow through and the two movies tank individually, that would really be egg on the Weinstein's faces. As for Disturbia - no doubt the Friday announcement of LeBeouf’s role in the next Indy movie was no coincidence (both movies are both Paramount productions). Although I think a large part of it is a reaction to Easter weekend's family comedy movies. In other words, the teens in the family were dragged along to one of last week's top three movies. This weekend they're not with the parents, the younger siblings, and the grandparents so they will go see what teens want to see - and this PG-13 thriller appears to have filled the bill. I haven't seen the movie, but it strikes me as a modern teen version of Rear Window - is that an accurate assessment? As for the upcoming Hot Fuzz, I'm not surprised that it's only opening in 700 theaters. That's about the same as Shaun of the Dead (which means that, like Shaun, it probably won't make my local multiplex). I guess they figure that most of us Yanks living outside the major metro areas can't handle a British movie unless it's a Bond flick.
CappyMorgan 4/15/2007 9:27:20 PM
Grindhouse was made in tribute of bad movies, exploitive movies. Why did they think a chick with a gun for a leg would bring people in? It is based on schlock and an indulgence for a couple of overhyped direcors and gore geeks. Not saying I'm not one. It would have been a better movie if they made it on the same, super low budgets similair to the 70's. Instead, they went all special effects and high dollar. I'm kind of confused about the statment "300 made us all look like fools"? Um, why? It has made 200 mill and will make even more. Everyone expected it to be a blockbuster and it was. Did I miss something?
snallygaster 4/15/2007 9:46:20 PM
Cappy, I believe Jarrod is referring to a poll he conducted in this column prior to the release of 300. He asked us to predict the total box office for it. Every one of us who chimed in - I think with one possible exception - came in with guesses that were blown out of the water when 300 opened. Even the professional prognosticators (studios, professional media writers, etc.) did not expect 300 to be as successful as it was.
1 2 3 >  >>