Television Review


DOCTOR WHO - The Empty Child

By: Jason Davis
Review Date: Saturday, May 13, 2006

At once harkening back to the tropes of the classic series and raising the bar for the modern incarnation, "The Empty Child" excels at everything that makes good DOCTOR WHO. From the TARDIS' arrival in 1941 London to the onslaught of the gas masked patients in Albion Hospital, the episode features all the cinematic disciplines working in concert to create a truly memorable experience that effectively sets up the second half of the story while presenting a coherent and entertaining whole.

Writer Steven Moffat, best known as the creator of the UK hit COUPLING, often employed intricately plotted parallel stories in his own series and brings that talent, along with his magnificent sense of humor, to DOCTOR WHO. In the tradition of the original series, the Doctor and his companion are quickly parted to embark on their own separate experiences before being reunited at the show's climax. Whereas the original series used this device to pad out the story with two locales eating up screen time to fill the timeslot, Moffat essentially creates two Doctor/companion pairings. While the Doctor teams up with Nancy to investigate the mysterious child, Rose finds a surrogate Doctor in Captain Jack Harkness, a 51st Century conman who fits her TREK inspired ideas of a space adventurer. Both teams proceed elegantly through their split story allowing the writer to hide exposition in the creepy Doctor/Nancy sequences alongside more information in the Rose/Jack moments. Still, Moffat's greatest accomplishment has to be the sheer horror exuded by a gas-masked child calling out for a missing mother. Touching upon the sense of loss every child feels when separated from a parent and combining it with an unnaturalness that raises the hairs on the back of the neck, the writer has created what will doubtlessly remain one of the most iconic images in DOCTOR WHO.


Director James Hawes, making his DOCTOR WHO debut, manages an astonishing energy even in scenes that should be drowning in plot points while his crew create a realistic and atmospheric Blitz-ridden London. The film noir lighting adds a tremendous element of menace while the production design, as usual for BBC period pieces, is spot on. The special effects, particularly the air raid and Dr. Constantine's transformation, make one wonder whether they're watching the same series that once presented green bubble wrap as an alien parasite and Murray Gold's music has never been better.

On the acting front, Christopher Eccleston delivers absolute magic with his astonishment at the ringing of the TARDIS phone while his delivery of the "damp, little island" speech echoes the majesty of a similar monologue delivered by Tom Baker's Doctor in "The Ark in Space." Rose's flirtation with Jack Harkness takes advantage of Moffat's COUPLING experience to craft a witty repartee complete with a use of the now ubiquitous psychic paper. As Harkness, John Barrowman gets little to do besides smile and offer exposition, but the actor's charisma imbues every scene he's in and calls to mind the roguish characters oft employed by the original show's best writer, Robert Holmes. Florence Hoath's Nancy is another in a long line of guest characters who beg to be abducted by the Doctor to become a series regular. Contrasting her innocence with the certainty that she knows more than she's telling, Nancy takes on a depth seldom afforded to supporting characters in the series and her tragic ties to the titular empty child guarantee the audience's affection. With this wealth of talent in front of the camera, it's quite an accomplishment for Richard Wilson to steal the episode as Dr. Constantine whose sole scene builds the subtle menace of the first 35 minutes to a magnificent crescendo climaxing in... the credits.



More From Mania

Doctor Who - The Complete First Season

Doctor Number Eight
(Sunday, November 3, 2002)
DOCTOR WHO: RELATIVE DEMENTIAS
(Tuesday, August 13, 2002)
DOCTOR WHO: THE CAVES OF ANDROZANI
(Sunday, April 14, 2002)
DOCTOR WHO: THE ONE DOCTOR
(Friday, February 1, 2002)
DOCTOR WHO: PRIMEVAL
(Friday, December 14, 2001)
DOCTOR WHO: THE EYE OF THE SCORPION
(Monday, October 15, 2001)
WHO Comes to the Rescue
(Friday, July 13, 2001)

See more related content
More Content By Jason Davis
Pilot Fishing, part two
(Monday, September 4, 2006)
Pilot Fishing, part 1
(Monday, August 28, 2006)
Sinking My Teeth into Action
(Monday, August 21, 2006)
Musings of a TV Junkie
(Monday, August 14, 2006)
My First Time
(Monday, August 7, 2006)
THE 4400: The Ballad of Kevin and Tess
(Saturday, August 5, 2006)
THE DEAD ZONE: Symmetry
(Saturday, August 5, 2006)
STARGATE SG-1: Flesh and Blood
(Tuesday, August 1, 2006)
Lost in the Village
(Monday, July 31, 2006)
And now for something completely different...
(Monday, July 24, 2006)
Comments/Responses
1 2 > >>
snallygaster • May 13, 2006, 10:37am •
I was never a fan of the Dr. Who series, which I blame squarely on my local PBS station which carried the series but never seemed able to run it in the same consecutive time slot for two weeks in a row. And when I did tune in, one week the show would be in color with a crazy-haired chap with a scarf, the next time it would a black & white episode with an older gentleman playing the Doctor. It was all too confusing to even bother trying to find it in the TV Guide.

That said, I tuned into the current incarnation of Dr. Who with low expectations. I must say, I'm completely delighted, even if I have to play "catch up" with the show's long mythology (I at least have a notion of what a Dalek was, but not much more). Eccleston & Piper are both completely charming in their roles and have a terrific chemistry together. I'm now looking forward to boarding this TARDIS every Friday night.

coldhardtruth • May 13, 2006, 04:58pm •
Good episode! More serious, more realistic, far closer to Dr. Who's full potential than many of the other episodes I have seen.

• May 14, 2006, 02:38am •
This was an amazing episode, and I finally like Dr.Who. It also provided plenty of material for several months of nightmares, as the lost child is the scariest thing I have ever seen on TV. (Even more frightening than Bob from Twin Peaks.)

I may never be converted to a William Hartnell fan, but the new incarnations of the Doctor have won me over.

• May 15, 2006, 06:55am •
The fun of the original Dr Who was frequently as much about the sometimes cheesy dialogue and FX that came out of a Cracker Jack box as the scifi elements. Not this new incarnation. My only gripe is that it's been so Earth centric. All the episodes have either been on Earth or a space station orbiting it. Lets get out of the solar system and start exploring the universe like the old series did.

• May 15, 2006, 09:39am •
"Mummy? Are you my Mummy?"

• May 15, 2006, 09:39am •
As a new Who fan, I've been enjoying the show, but I thought, "No way am I going to plunk down $50 to $60 for the box set of season 1." These two episode might just have changed my mind.

• May 15, 2006, 09:47am •
>All the episodes have either been on Earth or a space
>station orbiting it. Lets get out of the solar system
>and start exploring the universe like the old series
>did.

You're right, as far as it goes. And actually, it's very England/present day centric. Shooting in present day locales allows them to produce the series at a much lower cost and avoid the cheesy sets and effects.

It also a great way to get fans to relate. As it is, a lot of Americans have to turn on captions because of the heavy accents.

If I had to choose between more "space" locations and cheesy British production values vs. England centric stories that are grippping and which don't make my roll my eye heavenward, I'll take the later.

• May 15, 2006, 09:59am •
>As Harkness, John Barrowman gets little to do besides
>smile and offer exposition

I would suggest that his presence and energy actually gave Eccleston and Piper something to play off of to create a tense love triangle. Whether he intended or not, Barrowman really brought something to the table in this respect. The end of episode wasn't "and they all lived happily ever after". It was more, "Huh, looks there's going to be some sparks."

• May 15, 2006, 10:11am •
***SLIGHT SERIES TWO SPOILER***

For those lamenting the Earth-centricity is series one, year two opens on another planet...it's called "New Earth" but it's another planet...

Jason
TV Wasteland

• May 15, 2006, 11:38am •
According to the Internet Movie Database, the reason the show is so "Earth-centric" is because they're trying to make the show accessible to new fans, and they don't want to alienate them with strange locals or mythology. As a new fan, who'd like to think he's open to stranger TV shows, I'm glad they're doing this. Plus, it's difficult enough explaining this show to my friends as it is.

1 2 > >>
Login to post a comment!