Movie Review
4 Comments | Add a Comment

0


FANTASTIC FOUR

By: Wendy Craigan
Date: Sunday, July 10, 2005

Given the widely reported, tangled history of this production, it's sort of impressive that the version of FANTASTIC FOUR that made it to the screen is respectably coherent and moderately enjoyable. Director Tim Story, credited writers Mark Frost and Michael France (possibly only the Writers Guild arbitration committee knows how many other screenwriters were involved at one point or another) and a game cast give us a superhero/supervillain origin story that has a lot of good moments but never feels like it's building toward anything big.

We meet scientist Reed Richards (Ioan Gruffudd) as he's pleading (albeit with dignity) with old schoolmate/rival/billionaire Victor Von Doom (Julian McMahon) to fund his research into an astral phenomenon that Reed believes holds the key to untold benefits to humankind. Reed turns out to be right about his study subject's capacity for wreaking change when the good doctor, his ex-astronaut best friend Ben Grimm (Michael Chiklis), Reed's ex-flame and fellow scientist Sue Storm (Jessica Alba), Sue's hotshot pilot brother Johnny (Chris Evans) and Victor are all aboard the Von Doom space station, the astral storm catches them not entirely prepared. In the days that follow, Johnny discovers he can burst into flame unharmed and fly; Sue becomes invisible when emotional and can project a forcefield; Reed finds that he can stretch his body like taffy. Ben becomes mega-strong, but with a drawback none of the others face he looks like a large collection of rocks with eyes and a mouth rather than a human being. Victor, who is jealous of Reed's relationship with Sue and angered by what this whole enterprise has cost him on many levels, is going through some changes of his own.

FANTASTIC FOUR wants to balance superhero action, identity crisis drama (as personified by Ben), light comedy about reactions to sudden fame (with Johnny in woo-hoo mode and the others mortified), sophisticated romantic comedy about a very reserved man and a woman who ... well, one of the film's several problems is that Sue is not tremendously well-defined (as a character physically, she's stunning, when we can see her, that is), and illustration of existential questions about responsibility and partnership.

Individually, some of the sequences are very charming and there are some nicely-thought-out grace notes, like Reed waking up to find out that the computer keyboard is literally (albeit temporarily) imprinted on his face. However, the overall effect is disjointed, as though the film keeps restarting itself in tiny increments, even when it moves into its finale.

Chiklis finds genuine emotion in the plight of Ben/Thing, while McMahon puts impish charm into Victor, so that we do get the sense that he sees himself as the injured party, rather than just a moustache twirler. Evans gives Johnny a quality of cheery narcissism that serves the character well, while Gruffudd in the straight man role is suitably concerned and anxious.

FANTASTIC FOUR doesn't capture the imagination in the way some superhero movies do, but it's genial and lively, with a lot of moments to make you grin.


Related Products
Comments/Responses
1
lracors • Jul 11, 2005, 09:23am •
I agree this film seems to land in the middle of comic book adaptations, which, fortunately leaves you wanting more instead of wondering why you saw it. The heart of the team is Benjamin Grimm a.k.a. “The Thing” who is tormented by what happened to him. “The Thing” is played expertly by easily the best actor in the movie, Michael Chiklis (Emmy winner for “The Shield”) who manages to show a huge range of emotions under tons of makeup. The film is lifted to above average status based on his performance alone. Chris Evans as Johnny Storm managed to play a great smart aleck as in the comics, if not more so, providing some the best unforced comic relief in a long time. Jessica Abel and Ioan Gruffudd round out a nicely put together ensemble cast. The villain in the film is Julian McMahon who's story wasn’t very compelling and lacked in the believability factor in several areas, plus, he had some just awful puns and jokes and provided some of the worst forced comic relief on film. I found some disbelief regarding how Reed was able to keep his building operational, but it’s not enough to detract from the energetic and goofy fun moments in the film buy some fine actors cast in roles that suit them. In the end, this felt like eating a really good appetizer, smelling the main course, then not being allowed to eat it. I'm spoiled by some truly great comic adaptations like Batman Begins, Sin City, X-2, and Spiderman (I & II). Therefore, I hope that the next FF (rumored to have “The Silver Surfer” and his planet-eating master “Galactus” as the antagonists) moves this franchise closer to the caliber of Fantastic and not in the same vein as this film which is just slightly above average. 2 ½ *’s

• Jul 11, 2005, 12:46pm •
"... has a lot of good moments but never feels like it’s building toward anything big."

LIKE WHAT FOR INSTANCE?!?!?!?

Why does every single action movie have to hinge upon the destruction of the world? I am anxiously awaiting the day when film reviewers get their own ideas instead of pulling from the same well as everyone else. I've now read at least 5 reviews of Fantastic Four and Cinescape's is the least harsh, but not nearly as positive as it should be.

Going into the theater, I expected the worst based on the reviews (and admittedly the less than impressive trailers). But I was pleasantly surprised that after an hour of waiting for the movie to go downhill, it didn't. For crying out loud, it isn't supposed to be Hamlet II. So some things were changed, big deal ... nothing even came close to being a deal breaker.

This was an excellent beginning ... small scale. Let's give them a chance to establish themselves and come to grips before they have to face Galactus for Heaven's sake!

And for the first time ever in a super hero film, the origin of their getups is actually believable.

See this film. Three stars.

• Jul 11, 2005, 09:13pm •
The Thing needs to be bigger.......make him look bigger the same way they made frodo and his compadres look smaller in Lord of the Rings.... The only thing I really liked about it was the interaction between Torch and Thing... it was pretty hilarious...

• Jul 17, 2005, 03:14am •
Overall, I liked the film, maybe not as much as Spiderman or Batman (I feel like it was seriously lacking in action), but it was enjoyable. What I did find really interesting was the fact that the main obstacle wasn't really Dr. Doom so much as it was the team themselves. The film really concentrated on establishing the team as a family unit. The final fight with Doom seemed to be there as a test of the team's new (and fragile) bond and ability to work together rather than a desperate fight to stop a madman's designs for destruction and domination (Dr. Doom seemed pretty easy to beat actually). Unfortunately, this focus on the origin didn't really pan out, and it felt more like the first half of a film than a full feature. Hopefully this means that the sequel will focus on the team's coping with being heroes, considering they didn't even really look at themselves that way until the very end of the film (and hopefully with a hell of a lot more action). Can't wait!

As a sidenote, the only thing that really bugged me about the film was the whole bridge sequence. Sure, they all got treated like heroes, but eveyrone seemed to forget that it was Ben's fault that all that happened in the first place!

1
Login to post a comment!