PDA

View Full Version : Word In Stone-Review of Goldfinger


tstone
07-01-2007, 04:52 PM
Slowly making my way through the early entry in the Bond series that I haven't really had a chance to see before, either at all or as the movie watching sophisticate that I am now.

A young Sean Connery at the height of his powers. A series that hasn't become too detached from reality, buried in excessive gadgetry, smothered in bad puns, or overwhelmed with over the top stunts. Goldfinger showed old school Bond at it's highest point. You believed Connery, and he did capture the two sides of 007 in this film, both the suave gentleman spy and the thuggish street killer, both necessary for his job.

Auric Goldfinger was loopy, but believable as a villian, his lust for gold leading him to conduct a scam to bump up the value of his gold stock, while throwing the economies of the Western world into a loop. His scam was thought out fairly interestingly. He did suss out the logistics of trying to move that much gold would be impractical, so he planned on turning it instead into nuclear soup. Of course, I wondered how he would actually suceed in getting a group of small plans to fly over a major American military installation without interferece. Now, they let him, because they were in on it and it had been altered, but I'm inclined that if Goldfinger had gone with it like he planned, that some of those planes at least might have gotten shot down short of their targets.

At any rate, Auric Goldfinger, though entertaining and interesting, isn't the most dangerous or menacing of the Bond supervillians. And of course, we got introduce to Oddjob, besides Jaws, one of the most interesting heavies Bond dealt with in the movies. But we only got him for one film.

Oh, and how about Pussy Galore? Besides having one of the coolest names of all the Bond babes, she is a busty blond bombshell who is NOT a helpless damsel in distress. She has skill in martial arts ability, is a master pilot. And geez, wotta rack.

I'm of the opinion that she's one of my all time fav Bond girls.

The best thing about this film is that it ages pretty well. It came out in 1964, but it's production values are high, and there is nothing about it that simply takes you out of the picture and screams DATED! Sure, some of the tech looks older, but it still fits and is believable, unlike some of the crap foisted on us in the later Moore era.

I think I'm going to have to add Goldfinger to my best Bond films of all time so far, alongside Goldeneye and Casino Royale

UNCLEagent
07-04-2007, 09:39 PM
I think I'm going to have to add Goldfinger to my best Bond films of all time so far, alongside Goldeneye and Casino Royale

Probably the wisest, most profound statement you've ever posted here. :D GF is my all time fav!

Good review!

tstone
07-05-2007, 02:39 AM
Glad you liked it! More coming. Up next is "The Spy Who Loved Me".

Space Tycoon
08-21-2007, 08:55 PM
It doesn't often happen, but I agree completely. Goldfinger is the best of the 007 movies, followed closely by Casino Royale and Goldeneye.

Although, I have to give a lot of love to The Living Daylights. I was interested in the Afghan struggle for independence back in the 80's and this movie kind of brought it home for me at the impressionable age of 15.






.

WhiteKnight
08-22-2007, 09:06 AM
I still prefer FRWL over GF, but GF is definitely one of the better Connery films.

Daltons Chin Dimple
08-22-2007, 11:38 PM
It's funny, but I find GF quite tiresome now and prefer DN, FRWL and TB over GF. It is still better than DAF and YOLT (and NSNA!) though.

But hey, that's just my opinion.

Kara Milovy
08-23-2007, 07:06 AM
DN, FRWL, and YOLT are probably the ones I rewatch the most. FRWL is the best, but they're all very watchable. YOLT is remarkably watchable; it's the first Bond movie that makes no sense at all, but each individual scene is a masterpiece even though it doesn't hang together.

WhiteKnight
08-24-2007, 04:49 AM
Interesting concept. Which is the more terrible? YOLT or DAF? Hmmm. I'm gonna have to go with DAF being the better flick. At least it's believable up to the moon buggy chase.

neglet
08-24-2007, 06:21 AM
I find YOLT hard to digest, just for Bond's completely unbelievable "Asian" disguise. And DAF was my first Bond in theaters (I think my first Bond ever)--my dad took me to see it twice. So I have a special fondness for it and can't look at it too critically.

conman
08-24-2007, 08:19 AM
DAF has a very strong first half. I love when they are slowly picking of the people involved in the smuggling. Then we get to Vegas and... you know the rest.

Archangel972
08-24-2007, 08:21 AM
I find DAF to be the worst Connery Bond film. YOLT may be silly at times but I find it highly entertaining. Asides from a few scenes, DAF seems to a complete bore for me.

Kara Milovy
08-24-2007, 09:58 AM
I find YOLT hard to digest, just for Bond's completely unbelievable "Asian" disguise. And DAF was my first Bond in theaters (I think my first Bond ever)--my dad took me to see it twice. So I have a special fondness for it and can't look at it too critically.

DAF was my first new Bond in theaters (the whole story is in my book), and like you, I can't look at it uncritically.

When I watch it repeatedly, some of the flaws are too visible—the weird mud bath scene, the bad moonbuggy sequence, the filming problems in the final shoot-out, but it has so much going for it. I do love it.

conman
08-25-2007, 05:08 AM
DAF was my first new Bond in theaters and, like you, I can't look at it uncritically.

Ditto me and TWINE.

tstone
08-29-2007, 04:40 AM
I'm like that with Octopussy. First Bond film I saw in theaters. Very flawed in many ways, but you know what? I still dig it muchly.