PDA

View Full Version : 10,000 B.c.

Trazalca
07-11-2007, 11:10 AM
And yes, I am officially stoked.

10,000 B.C. (http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1809724938/video/3317950/standardformat)
colmatrix
07-11-2007, 11:41 AM
Ditto. Looks awesome!
Al-Dog
07-11-2007, 12:06 PM
What; no dinosaurs? I hate when they remake a classic.



Only kidding. That looked pretty cool.
Strider
07-12-2007, 08:41 AM
That was a pretty sweet teaser. I hope the story will live up to the pretty visuals. That brief shot of the saber tooth glaring at the guy in the rain looked particularly nice. :D
DarkJedi
07-13-2007, 12:38 AM
It will be, Strider. Their doing this in the same vein as "300". A good March film that will bank even if it isn't historically accurate.

I'm stoked as well.
TheYah
07-13-2007, 01:29 AM
that trailer looked fantastic! love how this comes after reading news about the frozen baby mammoth found in Siberia! :) talk about timing aha
Deacon
07-13-2007, 05:12 AM
The film looks like it could be fun, but I'm getting pretty friggin' sick of trailers that show a brief shot then cut to black, then another shot, then black. Lather, rinse, repeat. "Twister"'s got a lot to answer for.
DarkJedi
07-13-2007, 05:22 AM
That seems to be the trick with "teaser" trailers than actual full blown trailers probably because some studios want at least a teaser out on the market eight months-to-a- year before the director yells "That's a wrap!"..

I say blame the studios for the cut to black part...
kah
07-13-2007, 07:48 AM
Ooooo!
Gentlemen Death
07-15-2007, 03:11 PM
I am not a fan of Independence Day or The Day After Tomorrow, so I honestly think I will skip this one....The trailer did nothing for me anyways....Oh well, I guess when the movie get close to releasing I will find out more information.
Bill_the_Pony
10-20-2007, 10:53 PM
If they make a sequel to this, would it be called 9,999 B.C. :confused:
mckracken
10-21-2007, 01:17 AM
If they make a sequel to this, would it be called 9,999 B.C. :confused:

nope... that would be the PREQUEL... the sequel would be called 10,001 B.c.
Bill_the_Pony
10-21-2007, 11:53 AM
nope... that would be the PREQUEL... the sequel would be called 10,001 B.c.

No, the PREQUEL would be 10,001 BC.

The calendar counts down as time goes forward B.C. :p

Either way, it looks like typical Roland Emmerich fluff, well made and completely empty.
InDi_GurL
02-15-2008, 10:30 AM
at first i thought it's not a good movie, and doesn't got my interest. but then after i saw the trailer, i said to myself that i'm gonna watch it.
Al-Dog
02-15-2008, 02:22 PM
at first i thought it's not a good movie, and doesn't got my interest. but then after i saw the trailer, i said to myself that i'm gonna watch it.
So I says to myself, “Self, you gonna see that movie?” Self says “I was thinking ‘bout it, you?” Well I said “If you see it, I guess I’ll have to.” Well, self said . . .

:wink:
Eternal Emperor
02-15-2008, 06:09 PM
Eye tolled mice elf eggs act lee thus aim.


(Sorry, I've been on this phonetic kick lately... :smirk: )
Bill_the_Pony
02-24-2008, 01:56 PM
That's sofa king! We taught it! :D

I'll of it! :D :D