Kaeos
09-25-2008, 05:45 PM
Turns out what you think you may know is probably out of date as of last year.
I'm usually one to rail against fear mongering, but in this case, I am afraid and I think we all have something to be afraid of.
Look this one up:
Public Law 109-364, or the "John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007" (H.R.5122) (2), which was signed by the commander in chief on October 17th, 2006, in a private Oval Office ceremony, allows the President to declare a "public emergency" and station troops anywhere in America and take control of state-based National Guard units without the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to "suppress public disorder."
I think a lot of Americans missed this, but Bush essentially made himself King by signing two laws giving him complete and total power in a time of natural disaster, terrorist attack or public disorder. These laws also include suspending elections.
So then we see last night's prime time speech and we hear a message about how bad it is and that "More banks could fail, including some in your community. The stock market would drop even more, which would reduce the value of your retirement account. The value of your home could plummet. Foreclosures would rise dramatically."
Are they trying to whip everyone into a hysteria? Are they trying to cause more "Indy Mac" style runs on the bank? Sure seems like they are trying to incite fear and response.
That could lead to...I dunno "Civil Unrest"? Give them a good enough reason to exercise "Public Law 109-364" and suspend the election?
We're already seeing the attempts to stop the debates. We're "suspending the campaign" for what has now been demonstrated to be a farce.
I wrote a post here a long time back speculating that they will find a way. Some way to create a reason for them to declare Martial Law and suspend the elections.
I seriously hope I am wrong. But this just feels to close for comfort.:(
I'm usually one to rail against fear mongering, but in this case, I am afraid and I think we all have something to be afraid of.
Look this one up:
Public Law 109-364, or the "John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007" (H.R.5122) (2), which was signed by the commander in chief on October 17th, 2006, in a private Oval Office ceremony, allows the President to declare a "public emergency" and station troops anywhere in America and take control of state-based National Guard units without the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to "suppress public disorder."
I think a lot of Americans missed this, but Bush essentially made himself King by signing two laws giving him complete and total power in a time of natural disaster, terrorist attack or public disorder. These laws also include suspending elections.
So then we see last night's prime time speech and we hear a message about how bad it is and that "More banks could fail, including some in your community. The stock market would drop even more, which would reduce the value of your retirement account. The value of your home could plummet. Foreclosures would rise dramatically."
Are they trying to whip everyone into a hysteria? Are they trying to cause more "Indy Mac" style runs on the bank? Sure seems like they are trying to incite fear and response.
That could lead to...I dunno "Civil Unrest"? Give them a good enough reason to exercise "Public Law 109-364" and suspend the election?
We're already seeing the attempts to stop the debates. We're "suspending the campaign" for what has now been demonstrated to be a farce.
I wrote a post here a long time back speculating that they will find a way. Some way to create a reason for them to declare Martial Law and suspend the elections.
I seriously hope I am wrong. But this just feels to close for comfort.:(