Should sequels be filmed back to back????????

[denjin]

And should they be split apart 6 months like the Matrix films were , and do you think thats the right financial thing to do?

[denjin]

Guess I havent reached my level of seniority yet to open a thread and have people respond.


*cough* dear moderator can you put this thread on ice ,and lock it up please?

[Pod]

Maybe you need an avatar? :wink: 8)

I say every three years there should be a new film, gives them time for a perfect film and all. There i post in the danger zone. :lol:

[Sonic1002]

I say they should do it like Spider-Man or Star Wars, about every two tothree years, give the people a new one, one that was better than the original. (Episode 2 was an exception to this rule... cuz it just sucked...)

[The Xenos]

For me, I'd love to see them back to back. As soon as Begins ended, I wanted the next movie, well, as soon as the damn credits ended.

Again, I'm dying to see Long Halloween adapted. Though with Falcone getting screwed over by Scarecrow, not sure how some of it is gonna work. Still there is a lot they could use from those books, too much for one movie. So if they split it up into two films, it might work.

-Xenos