TV Wasteland


Friends, Romans, Convicts…

By: David Michael Wharton
Date: Monday, August 15, 2005

I promised myself I wouldn't let the STARGATE discussion stretch into a third week, much as I do like antagonizing overly zealous Gaters, but the below email turned up in my account last week and I just couldn't let it pass.

Kaya Jackson wrote: "You can probably judge which side of the Stargate/ Farscape fence I'm on by the fact that after my little email group passed the links to your article(s) around we argued amongst ourselves about who could be the first to offer you a spare kidney should you ever need one. (I won, but you have three-kidney backup, fyi.)

"To be brief: thank you for expressing what a lot of fans are feeling. You're actually a fair bit more upbeat about Ben and Claudia being on Stargate than I am. While I'm extremely glad that they're getting work and exposure, I find SG1 utterly depressing in its mediocrity. I do realize that that's all the writers there are striving for and that I shouldn't begrudge them for not wanting to challenge their audience, in other words, for not being Farscape, but I'm afraid the latter just set the bar too high."


Well, that ought to re-ignite the shouting that had finally died down. "TV Wasteland: Give Us Enough Time, and We'll Find Some Way to Piss You Off, No Matter Who You Are."

Much more important than the continuing controversies surrounding ScapeGate, however, is the fact that my readership is now offering me their bodies. While I'm sure I'm not the first writer to have female readers offer up their bodies, this may be the first instance of specific internal organs being involved. It's unclear, however, whether the kidney being offered actually belongs to Kaya or not, so if you're the poor schmuck who wakes up in a bathtub full of ice with "Call 911" scribbled in lipstick on the mirror, I do apologize for the inconvenience.


Now that I've spent 300 words on organlegging, let's get down to it. By now, all the networks have announced the premiere dates for their assorted shows, so this is as good a time as any to do a bit of house cleaning. Below I'll begin wading through the premiere dates for every show I even remotely care about or feel like listing, followed by news, rumors, and capsule reviews of those pilots I've actually seen. If a favorite show of yours is missing from the list, it's because I've specifically singled you out because I saw what you did to that old lady behind the barn, and I don't like it one bit, mister.

This will take a few weeks depending on how many of these shows inspire me to logorrhea, so stay tuned.

Sunday, August 28


ROME - HBO, 8 PM CST
The second of the competing Rome dramas finally makes its premiere, several weeks after the lackluster rise and fall of ABC's EMPIRE. The involvement of manly-man director John Milius as producer and writer should prove interesting, and the blood-soaked promos HBO has been running promise that this show will at the very least offer plenty of the Roman virtues ABC could only hint at: wine, women, song, and more than a little of the old ultra-violence. However, with a $70M budget, ROME better bring in SOPRANOS ratings or risk getting thrown to the lions like similarly pricey period piece CARNIVALE.

Monday, August 29


PRISON BREAK - Fox, 8 PM CST
FOX tries its damnedest to spawn the next 24 with this high-concept thriller that follows the titular prison break as it unfolds over 22 episodes. Specifically, the attempts of a prison designer (Wentworth Miller) who gets himself tossed in the clink as part of an elaborate scheme to pull a SHAWSHANK by freeing his convict brother (who is incarcerated in a jail Miller's character designed) before said brother's execution date rolls around and things turn all GREEN MILE on them. Wow, two Stephen King prison-movie references in the same sentence. Thanks, Frank Darabont!

This one's been getting all sorts of buzz thanks to the shock and awe marketing tactics of Fox, who have been carpet-bombing prime time with promos for this show for roughly the past 27 months. Aside from the clever-so-long-as-you-don't-think-too-hard premise, the show generates chatter thanks to the involvement of Brett "I'm putting a mutant hooker in X3" Ratner, who directed the pilot and is exec producing. Even ignoring the overzealous marketing push, FOX is clearly excited about this one, having recently inked a three-year, seven-figure deal with series creator Paul Scheuring. But does the pilot live up to the hype?

Yes and no. As far as pilots go, it's by no means the best I've ever seen, but it does a solid job of introducing the world and the characters that inhabit it, establishing the problems that will drive the plot, and dangling several curious mysteries that will give the show a larger scope than merely "Will they bust out or not?" Series lead Miller is charismatic, and I'm sure recovering JOHN DOE fans will be tickled pink to see Dominic Purcell getting work again as death row bro Lincoln Burrows. The troubled home life of Burrows' son already promises to become the Kim Bauer thread that we'll all be sick of by the end of the third episode, but hopefully the show's writers will learn the lesson of 24 and not have the kid menaced by mountain lions unless he is subsequently killed and eaten by them.

The pilot also ends on a clever reveal that, much like the core concept of the show itself, only loses some of its luster if you start thinking too hard about it. Then again, 90% of the stuff produced in Hollywood doesn't hold up terribly well when logic or common sense are applied. If the name of the game is "you buy the premise, you buy the bit," then I'll be perfectly willing to suspend my disbelief if the show maintains or improves its quality from the pilot. At this point, it could go either way, but I think it's got a fair shot of becoming the next big hit for Fox. Of course, even if their first season is a runaway hit, PRISON BREAK shares the same conceptual problem as Fox's REUNION (see below); namely, how do you do a second season?

Thursday, September 8


THE O.C. - Fox, 7 PM CST
I missed the boat on this show, so I'm afraid I haven't a clue what Seth Cohen, Marissa Cooper, Summer Roberts, Ryan Atwood and the rest are up to. I fully plan to catch up on DVD one of these days, if only to further enrich my pop culture lexicon and to try and puzzle out why anyone thinks Mischa Barton is anything but freakish looking. I've heard fans of the show complain that last season didn't have the same magic as the first year, but obviously it's still pulling in ratings enough for Fox to give it a third. At any rate, it should make a good pairing with its demographic companion…

REUNION - Fox, 8 PM CST
Another high-concept offering from the fine folks at FOX, this one's drama/mystery that follows six friends over the course of twenty years, beginning in 1986 and unfolding one year per episode. In the "present" of 2006, one of those six friends has been murdered, so the show alternates between scenes of a broody bad-cop interrogating the surviving friends and flashbacks to the years preceding, including events that will no doubt eventually reveal both the identity of the murder victim and the whys and wherefores of their death.

This one's a case of being a little too clever. If either the mystery plot or the traditional drama of the flashbacks excelled in their respective genres, it might make this show memorable beyond the draw of its hook, but the pilot doesn't offer much in either case. The scenes in the "present" suffer from the acrobatics the writers are forced to resort to in order to avoid revealing which friend is the one in the casket. Characters go to great lengths to avoid specifics or names, and it doesn't take long before the whole exercise starts to strain credulity to the point of annoyance. It's a problem similar to the one JACK AND BOBBY faced with regards to revealing which of the brothers was destined for the Oval Office. That show wisely realized that it would be more trouble than it was worth to try and keep the secret for a full season (or seasons), so it let the cat out of the bag by the end of the pilot. That decision allowed the show to focus on the characters, the questions of who this boy was and how he becomes the man he is destined to be, rather than trying to milk the mystery, which would no doubt have grown stale before even a half-season. REUNION could stand to take a few lessons from J+B. Especially since the flashbacks fail to differentiate themselves from a thousand similar stories, all teen angst and dramatic histrionics. Such-and-such breaks up with so-and-so, or Overly Handsome Teen Lead #1 asks Overly Handsome Teen Lead #2 to help cover up a scandal (a scenario that was handled much better, I might add, on, again, JACK AND BOBBY).

The show does feature a few semi-familiar faces, notably former LIFE AS WE KNOW IT Tom Cruise clone Sean Faris and Alexa Davalos, who played lightning lass Gwen on ANGEL and all-grown-up Kyra in THE CHRONICLES OF RIDDICK (though she is so far sadly lacking in the leather pants department). Also, Jon Harmon Feldman, late of TRU CALLING, is on board as a writer and EP.

The show's premise also dead-ends the possibility of a second season with the same characters. Assuming the show lasts, each season of the show will supposedly follow a 20-year span in the lives of a new group of characters. That is potentially interesting, making for some bizarre hybrid between an anthology show and the standard serialized dramatic structure we're used to. If they actually go that route, they would be making use of this concept in a way I'd always wondered if 24 would ever embrace, since with that show as with this one, the core concept lends itself to virtually limitless numbers of stories. Which sounds good in concept, but breaks down in the real world. If this show is a hit, at least part of that success will be because viewers fall in love with this batch of characters. That puts the network in a bit of a pickle when it comes time to renew. Do you really risk the established success by tossing virtually everything out the window in favor of introducing a new crop of characters and stories, which may or may not find the favor of the loyal viewing audience? What is the alternative? Somehow find a way to squeeze another 20 years out the same characters, following a different 20-year period? Which should we go with: birth through young adulthood or middle age through retirement? Much more than either 24 or even PRISON BREAK, REUNION could find itself a victim of its own concept. With 24, we're willing to go along with Jack Bauer being the epicenter of every world-threatening event in history, because it's an action-thriller, and if it worked for Bruce Willis, it can damn well work for Kiefer. REUNION doesn't seem to have the same flexibility to survive into future seasons.

That's plenty for this week. Check back next Monday and we'll continue our trek through the coming season.

Send all questions, comments, and speculations about my parentage to tvwasteland@cinescape.com. Keep your head and hands inside the television, folks…


MONDAY, AUGUST 15


REMEMBER THE TITANS (7 PM CST, ABC) Unless you're the Greek gods. Then just do your best to forget about them (tip: avoid objects and situations that might bring up the subject of Tartarus, such as serving anything with Tartar Sauce).

X DAY: THE INVASION OF JAPAN (7 PM CST, History) Examining Operation Downfall, an Allied plan for the invasion of Japan that never came to fruition in the wake of the Japanese surrender after the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

SIX FEET UNDER 2001 2005 (7 PM CST, HBO) The soon-to-be deceased funeral home drama gets a post mortem.

ENTOURAGE (8:30 PM CST, HBO) "Blue Balls Lagoon." You know what's even weirder than a fictional plotline about James Cameron directing an AQUAMAN movie? Rumors of James Cameron actually directing an AQUAMAN movie.

WEIRD U.S. (9 PM CST, History) "Weird Worship." Hopefully, they'll include my personal favorite cheesy religious tourist trap, the giant stone Jesus in Eureka Springs, Arkansas.

WEEDS (9 PM CST, Showtime) "Free Goat." Wow, most places just give you a toaster.


TUESDAY, AUGUST 16


TEEN CHOICE AWARDS (7 PM CST, FOX) The Black Eyed Peas are scheduled to perform, but no word yet as to whether lead singer Fergie plans to soil herself onstage. (If you don't know to what that refers, and aren't bothered by scenes of celebrity urination, click here.)

THE SLEEPING DICTIONARY (7 PM CST, IFC) Sadly, the nude scene in this movie features a body double rather than the lovely Jessica Alba, since, as we all know, she doesn't do screen nudity. Not even while playing a stripper in a hard-R film wherein more or less everyone in the film takes their kit off at some point, and said nudity would actually thematically serve the plot. Translucent tops on the red carpet at a semi-major awards show, however? Well, that's a different story… Don't you love Hollywood logic?

RESCUE ME (9 PM CST, FX) "Rebirth." Tommy addresses Janet's antidepressant problem by having a few himself.


WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 17


THE OFFICE (7 PM CST, NBC) "Pilot." If, like me, you missed this Americanized take on the pitch-black Britcom hit, here's your chance to catch up. Three more episodes follow. (Repeat)

STARSHIP TROOPERS (7 PM CST, TNT) Putting aside how far it strayed from Heinlein's classic, it was cheesy fun. However, I have a feeling that watching it on TNT will strip it of its inherent…what's the word…Verhoven-ocity.

GHOST HUNTERS (8 PM CST, Sci-Fi) "Mordecai & U.S.S. N. Carolina." TAPS investigates a WWII ship supposedly haunted by the victims of a torpedo attack.

OVER THERE (9 PM CST, FX) "I Want My Toilets." Time was, I'd settle for my MTV, but times have changed.

BLACK ADDER (9:20 PM CST, BBC America) Edmund's classic attempts to avoid a duel to the death with the Duke of Wellington.


THURSDAY, AUGUST 18


THE MATRIX (7 PM CST, TNT) Watch this and pretend they never made any sequels.

BRING IT ON (8 PM CST, USA) It would be remiss of me as a columnist not to point out Kirsten Dunst and Elisha Dushku in bikinis and cheerleading outfits.

STARVED (9 PM CST, FX) "Scrotal Origami." Wherein Sam learns the importance of care when grooming, you know, down there.

IT'S ALWAYS SUNNY IN PHILADELPHIA (9:30 PM CST, FX) "Underage Drinking." In order to bolster their income, the guys decide that the pub doesn't need to mess with formalities such as minimum drinking ages.


FRIDAY, AUGUST 19


ON THE WATERFRONT (7 PM CST, TCM) It's easy to forget, given the cartoonish caricature of himself he became in his later years, but back in the day, Brando was really something.

STARGATE SG-1 (7 PM CST, Sci-Fi) "Beachhead." Samantha Carter rejoins SG-1 in an episode that, as far as I know, has nothing at all to do with the G.I. Joe infantry specialist.

DEGRASSI: THE NEXT GENERATION (7 PM CST, Noggin) Kevin Smith continues his guest stint, now joined by Jason Mewes.

STARGATE ATLANTIS (8 PM CST, Sci-Fi) "Trinity." Apparently never having watched 2001, McKay tries to tap the power of an Ancient monolith.

BATTLESTAR GALACTICA (9 PM CST, Sci-Fi) "Home." Roslin reunites with Starbuck and Helo on Caprica, which doesn't bode well for the preggers Cylon Sharon.


SATURDAY, AUGUST 20


INSOMNIA (7 PM CST, AMC) After making the movie about the guy who can't remember, but before making the movie about the guy who can't forget, Christopher Nolan directed this movie about a guy who can't sleep.

THE SHOP AROUND THE CORNER (7 PM CST, TCM) This 1940 romantic comedy was later given the Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan treatment, resulting in YOU'VE GOT MAIL.

EPICENTER (8 PM CST, Sci-Fi) "Legitimate actress" Traci Lords stars in this story about a state witness and detective whose attempts to avoid the mob are complicated by an earthquake. I dunno, wouldn't the panic of an earthquake actually make them harder to find?

DUNE (10 PM CST, Sci-Fi) I'm still kinda partial to the slightly cheesy Sci-Fi Channel miniseries version of this tale, but if you'd like to see the expanded version of David Lynch's take, here's your chance. All four hours of it.


SUNDAY, AUGUST 21


THE 4400 (8 PM CST, USA) "The Fifth Page." An epidemic breaks out amongst the 4400, and Isabelle is examined without Lily's say-so.

SIX FEET UNDER (8 PM CST, HBO) "Everyone's Waiting." That's all, folks. (Series finale)

THE DEAD ZONE (9 PM CST, USA) "Coming Home." Johnny investigates mysterious deaths at the retirement home where Sarah's dad lives.


This concludes our broadcast.

More Content By David Michael Wharton
Exit, Stage Right
(Monday, November 21, 2005)
The Piller of Our Community
(Monday, November 7, 2005)
TV Not on DVD: The Your-Two-Cents Edition
(Monday, October 31, 2005)
Why Are These Not on My Shelf?
(Monday, October 24, 2005)
I Giggle When I Type 'Mail Bag'
(Monday, October 17, 2005)
Surfacing with Josh Pate
(Monday, October 10, 2005)
Don't Judge a Book By Its Pilot
(Monday, October 3, 2005)
Don't Mention Kolchak
(Monday, September 26, 2005)
All TV and No Play Make David a Dull Boy
(Monday, September 19, 2005)
Sitcoms and Space Invaders
(Monday, September 12, 2005)
Comments/Responses
1 2 > >>
• Aug 15, 2005, 11:02am •
I liked the Americanized Office. It wasn't as good as the British version (especially the American version of Gareth), but has a lot of potential. Steve Carell does a fantastic job and I think the rest of the cast will also be great if they are given the opportunity to develop.

I feel like the American version was a little more centered upon Carell's character whereas the British version focused more on the Tim/Dawn relationship thing.

So there are 4 episodes of The Office on Wednesday (did I understand it correctly)? Do you happen to know when season 2 premiers?

• Aug 15, 2005, 12:10pm •
Wait! There is a controversy behind Farscape vs. Stargate? I find that hard to believe and makes me guess that those that are defending Stargate as better than Farscape have not watched the complete series of Farscape. I have watched up to Season 5 of Stargate, Season 6 is on it's way courtesy of Netflix, in two days. Farscape was genre bending, going in directions that seldom shows go in (except for the beloved buff or angel, but those still might be outdone by the craziness of farscape). Stargate however is a family friendly show that is basically like watching the Old Star Trek series. I'm not going to begrudge it because I like it as a entertaining sci fi show, with fun characters and writing that accomplishes what it's meant to...to entertain. It's definately one for the masses as Farscape is a little harder to get into, but once you do, man...the dimensions of Criton and Aeryn Sun grip and twist your SOUL! Watch them both, support genre television. SIDENOTE: Ben and Claudia on Stargate is crap. I say that because I feel like scapers are being pulled to Stargate unfairly. We are so passionate about Farscape that we basically want that relationship between the characters from Scape to continue, and it won't...not in Stargate at least *sigh*. But then again....eh...who cares Viva Sci Fi

• Aug 15, 2005, 12:39pm •
i still don't understand why people compare farscape and stargate together like this. they are two different shows. not even in style or writing or anything, but just two different shows. let it be.

that being said (i'm gonna get yelled at for this but i can't stop myself) i think most of the people who watch farscape are more or less like it for the look. i tried to get into the show i really did. the characters and the story annoyed me to no end. it didn't help that the first episode i saw had something to do with ben having a wet dream or something and all the female characters were all around in in porn like costumes. made me feel like the show was hitting the cliche of making the female characters sex toys so men can wack off. the other episodes were boring to me.

yes, i know stargate hits the cliches as well, but at least they poke fun of them and themselves. it is light hearted and as many people said before fun. whats wrong with a show that is just fun? it can't be drama all the freaking time.

so i guess if you were a fan of both shows then you get the better. a more dramatic (i guess) farscape with a more fun (and still pretty dramatic to me) stargate.

now, you may get angry at me for what i just said.

• Aug 15, 2005, 01:27pm •
You are definitely right about them being two different shows. I really don't think there is much grounds for comparison.

I do not agree, however, with your Scapers like the show for it's look idea. Although the show had a fantastic look, I kept coming back week after week because of the amazing characters and their interactions and chemistry (same reason I watched Buffy). I really cared about these characters a lot, which was probably the show's greatest strength. I actually cried when D'Argo died (supposedly) in Peacekeeper Wars, and I haven't cried over a movie/tv show since I was a little kid. The show was only helped by the usually fun and entertaining stories told every week that often weaved together into a complex and fascinating long-term story arc.

You basically supported spacekicker's assertion, leaderbean, that many people who disliked Farscape did not see the entire show, or even an entire season. The problem with Farscape was that it wasn't very accessible to newcomers. If you hadn't been watching the show very regulalry and from nearly the beginning, it would be very hard to get into.

I am not surprised that many people don't like Farscape because it really didn't strike me as a show that could appeal to everyone. It really did appeal to a certain audience so I hold nothing against people who didn't like the show because it just might not be your cup of tea(kinda like how Wes Anderson movies only appeal to a certain group of people). Stargate, on the other hand, strikes me as a very fun and entertaining show that just about everyone could enjoy and get into with ease.

• Aug 15, 2005, 03:32pm •
well, i can't really blame some people for being turned off by Stargate at first. the look of the show in the beginning was quite cheap looking. (not their fault bad funding at first)

some of my best friends are scapers.

i guess the first episode i saw wasn't the best to start out with for me. i heard black's character was good. i like smart strong female characters in my sci-fi. (samantha carter) i think i will give farscape another shot. i guess i got kind of angry with most scapers (not all) bashing stargate like anyone who liked it was an idiot. if it isn't your cup of tea thats okay, but there are far far worse shows out there. lets all bash the simple life, please.

• Aug 15, 2005, 03:47pm •
I'll never understand sci-fi fanboys. If you love Star Trek you have to hate Star Wars. If you love Farscape you have to hate Stargate. If you love Babylon 5 you have to worship at the alter of JMS and constantly berate Star Trek. If you love old Battlestar Galactica the new Battlestar Galactic MUST suck. Etc, etc.

Why can't we all just enjoy each series for *what it is*? Or at least, appreciate that there is as much variety and interest as there is. Certainly, science fiction is a "niche" genre (at best) - and yet we have this persistant need, this fragile ego to protect - so we bash anything in the genre. As if another show is threatening our "favourite".

Frankly, I'm a fan of both Farscape and Stargate. And there is just NO comparing the two shows - beyond that they share this vague "science fiction" genre label.

Calling something "depressing in its mediocrity" while offering ZERO in the ways of credible critical analysis only serves to denote that the writer is, in effect, a gigantic idiot-stick.

For what it's worth, if you don't appreciate Stargate - at least understand that the reason it's been going for 9 f*cking seasons is that there ARE people who enjoy it. And while their taste may not be as incredibly, pretentiously astute as your own - it's survived for a reason.

So in conclusion, Stargate and Farscape haters can kiss my arse.

• Aug 15, 2005, 03:59pm •
You know I like Stargate SG-1 the way it was. I like Stargate: Atlantis and I like Farscape too, but this new incarnation of Stargate SG-1 is just plain fun with Claudia. It doesn't have the depth of Battlestar: Galactica, so I can't say I like it as much as that, but it is just plain fun. I know full well that some people need intelligence in what they watch or it is a depressing waste to them, but others of us can use a chance to unwind with a bit of fun too. That doesn't make one right and the other wrong just different and appealing to different tastes. One thing I've learned from experience is that reviewers tend to prefer the more intelligent things while that is not so true for the public. There are always exceptions though as this is no rule. The best shows though have some nice balance of both fun and intelligence. I will not say SG-1 is better than Galactica though just more fun and less intelligent. Perhaps the balance is not as good for many of us. Still I like it and want to see how it all plays out. What else is there to say?

• Aug 15, 2005, 04:37pm •
I can't watch ANY of the Stargate shows. I've tried. I've tried them all once or twice depending upon whether or not my dvd player was working. I couldn't get into most eps of Trek: TNG either. I hated DS9, VOYAGER, and really hated ENTERPRISE (with the exception of Jolene Blalock). But I really liked every other film which is weird. However, of all the sci-fi dramas, I LOVE Firefly (mostly because I love just about anything JW does) and I really admire the hell out of BATTLESTAR GALACTICA. It's like the "Ocean's Eleven" of TV shows. It took a lame-o idea, remade it and remade it into something infinitely better than it was originally. What a great show!


P.S. - RIGHT f'ing ON about Jessica Alba and her TOTAL hypocrisy. I was looking at that pic of her at the MTV movie awards and I couldn't for the life of me understand how she could say "I won't do nudity in movies, even when I have to play a stripper even when it's essential to the atmosphere of the film", but apparently she's totally ok with showing her breasts in public. Does that serve an artistic purpose, I wonder? Or is she just showing them off to gain some more publicity for the suck that was FF?

• Aug 15, 2005, 07:14pm •
Wow, so much for moving on from the ScapeGate discussion this week...

Goin alllllllll the way back to the first comment, yes, mah19, thare are 4 eps of The Office airing Wednesday night. And the second season premieres September 20, I believe.

• Aug 15, 2005, 08:05pm •
Awesome and double awesome. Thanks for the info and keep up the great work.

1 2 > >>
Login to post a comment!