Movie News


From Indy to Tintin to Lincoln

By: Associate News Editor
Date: Monday, May 12, 2008
Source: Variety

With INDIANA JONES AND THE KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL to arrive in theaters in just a couple of weeks, Steven Spielberg is setting his sight on Abraham Lincoln and the Civil War.

Spielberg told German weekly magazine FOCUS that he might possibly begin filming the movie early in 2009. 

Variety reports, Tony Kushner wrote the script, which is based on the biography by Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Doris Kearns Goodwin's The Uniter: The Genius of Abraham Lincoln. Actor Liam Neeson agreed to play the part of Lincoln over three years ago. 

The director will first shoot TINTIN in early fall. As reported back in July 2007, Spielberg and Peter Jackson are teaming up to make three films based on the character of Tintin. Each filmmaker will direct at least one of the movies but no one has been set/decided upon for the third film. Spielberg, Jackson and Kathleen Kennedy will produce all three films, which could possibly be released through DreamWorks Animation.

The trilogy will be based on the comic-strip hero Tintin created by Georges Remi. Spielberg and Jackson have selected three stories from THE ADVENTURES OF TINTIN series, which encompasses 23 books, to base the films on. Spielberg first lined up the rights to the books from Remi's estate back in  December 2002.


More Content By Associate News Editor
1/6 Scale BAT-POD
(Wednesday, September 17, 2008)
Johnson Sets Up LOOPER
(Wednesday, September 17, 2008)
Kidman to Trot Globe in WONDER
(Wednesday, September 17, 2008)
NINJA 2 to Shoot in Korea
(Wednesday, September 17, 2008)
Screamfest Starts With TRICK
(Wednesday, September 17, 2008)
THE JOKER 1/2 Scale Bust
(Wednesday, September 17, 2008)
Variety Calls IGOR Mirthless
(Wednesday, September 17, 2008)
Affleck Heading to TOWN
(Tuesday, September 16, 2008)
Foxworthy Gets Animated for FOX
(Tuesday, September 16, 2008)
HBO Goes on MANHUNT
(Tuesday, September 16, 2008)
Fandango Logo
Comments/Responses
1 2 > >>
AzuLTaLoN • May 12, 2008, 12:11am •
if he does do lincoln i hope it does it 100% truthful (as far as we know it) and doesn't back down to pressure from studios.

kimbroo • May 12, 2008, 12:29am •
We're talking about Spielberg here, the American version of Senor Spielbergo. If anyone is applying pressure of any kind to any of his films, it is him. What he says, goes.

exfan • May 12, 2008, 02:07am •
experience show clearly over the year that when spielberg make more than a movie a year, it s crap ! amistad ? anyone !

WISEGUY562 • May 12, 2008, 05:45am •
I was under the impression that TinTin was going to be live action films, but I guess not. Lincoln should be a great movie IMO. His going to have his hands full editing this into a manageable time.

Roads • May 12, 2008, 06:34am •
Bring in Del Toro, Zemeckis or Gil Kenan to the third!

fft5305 • May 12, 2008, 08:10am •
Wait to see how the first movies do first, before talking about a third. Even though it's Spielberg & Jackson, Tintin isn't exactly Superman when it comes to brand name recognition. I'm actually more excited to see what he comes up with for Lincoln than I am about Tintin...

jamiekage • May 12, 2008, 08:35am •
I just hope he doesn't have Tom Hanks whispering in his ear trying to make Lincoln out to be evil, like he did with Alexander Hamilton in the John Adams miniseries.

lancedenier • May 12, 2008, 02:11pm •
But Alexander Hamilton was evil. He was at the center of events that led to the formation of political parties (I'm sure that would have happened anyway, but still); He openly confessed, in detail, about an affair that lead to his political demise, setting a precedent that we still suffer from to this day; He tampered with the elections of 1796 and 1800; He had a horrible temper and habit of insulting other gentlemen, which led to him frequently challenging duels or being challenged to them, which led to his death. Plus, he's on the $10, which isn't worth a damn thing anymore.

almostunbiased • May 12, 2008, 02:34pm •
Hamilton wasn't evil. He wasn't pure either, but he was a great man in some ways. He just had a lot of flaws. Sure he had an affair, and he's a ace for that, but as for the political demise, many other things caused that. But he didn't tamper with the elections he just twisted peoples arms, but nothing wa really illegal about what he did. And he didn't always insult other people he just said a lot of stuff behind their backs and then lied about not saying it. If we can even believe what other people have said. I mean I wasn't around at the parties so I don't really know. But the dude was a great military commander, one of the best our country has ever seen (And with out him Washington couldn't have one the war) and he came from absolutely nothing to be one of the most powerful men in our country. I'd say you have to give the dude credit. Flawed yes, evil? No way in hell. Alex B was the hot head.

hanso • May 12, 2008, 04:42pm •
Bret Ratner or McG for the last part! What what, represent son!!

1 2 > >>
Login to post a comment!