Comic Book Review

Send to a Friend



To: (email)


To: (name)


From: (name)


Message:



GHOST RIDER #1

By: Al Brown
Review Date: Friday, September 09, 2005

GHOST RIDER relaunches this week, presumably to drum up some interest in the character before next year's crapariffic movie. Seems a bit premature though, don't it? Since this is a six-issue limited series, and the movie doesn't come out for 11 months? My first guess would be that they're just allowing for the inevitable lateness of artist Clayton Crane's digital art (a la IRON MAN), but Crane insists he's actually already finished the whole thing, or at least most of it. I guess they're hoping this will sell well enough to either launch an ongoing series when it's over or at least start working Ghost Rider into the regular Marvel Universe again.





Ooh, hey! Maybe he could join the AVENGERS! They'll let anybody in nowadays!





I have to keep forcing myself to stay on-topic instead of going off on yet another rant about Mark Steven Johnson (director of movies such as "Daredevil" and "My Ass") and the doleful, stultifying sincerity that Nicolas Cage is sure to bring to the title character. Partly because we've heard it before, and it's sortof like predicting that I will get drunk at Fenway Park tonight: it's so obvious that it's really not worth saying. But also it's hard not to talk about the movie because nothing friggin happens in this book.





Here's what happens: okay, there's a wicked cool prologue that shows what Johnny Blaze has been doing for the past few years (here's a hint: burning). (And yes, we are back to Johnny Blaze. 2001's GHOST RIDER relaunch brought Blaze back without particularly bothering to explain why, and this series seems fine with that.) Then there's a whole lot of some dudes with wings talking. Lots and lots of talking. There's a quick introduction to what I assume are a couple of bad guys, or else really mean good guys, but we don't learn anything about them other than they're mean. Then one of the wingy dudes is all, "Hey, we should get Ghost Rider!" And the other dude's like, "Golly, that sounds hard!" And that's pretty much it.





The weird thing is that this is written by Garth Ennis (PUNISHER), who's usually quite a bit snappier than this. Yeah, he's definitely been decompressed - most of his PUNISHER arcs have been six issues. But the thing with decompression, as we all know, is that it's cool as long as you don't get friggin bored. And Garth's usually pretty good about not being friggin boring. Man, it just kills me when the first issue of a story is all prologue, and by the end all that's happened is that some folks have decided to do stuff and some other folks have announced their intention to do stuff and some other folks have just stood around looking moody and no one's actually gotten around to the "stuff" part yet. This seems especially misguided when you're trying to reintroduce a character that's been out of the picture for years.






At least it looks nice, though. Crane has created completely digital art for the book, and it's pretty badass. Ghost Rider himself is particularly cool, as is his flaming bike. Crane has a little more trouble with normal people, whose faces tend to be kinda weird and shiny-looking. Hey, you know those little flesh-colored plastic things when you were a kid and you squeezed them and their eyes and ears popped out? No? Well anyway, some of Crane's people look like that. But in some ways they're actually more expressive than Crane's fellow digital artist Adi Granov (IRON MAN). And Crane has a much sketchier, more organic style; his art at its best, like in some wicked scenes in Hell, looks like something that you can't imagine being created either on a computer or by hand. Which is definitely cool.





So I have a good feeling that some really cool stuff will happen at some point in this series. It's Garth Ennis, after all, and the first issue does promise some fun action around the bend. And also...well, it's Ghost Rider! He's got a flaming skull for a head! But still: you know what you get when you take a great-looking book with potential, and you mix it with some deathly slow action? You get a trade paperback, is what you get. And this book screams "WAIT FOR THE TRADE!" Then it threatens to hold its breath until its head lights on fire unless you do what it says.



More Content By Al Brown
JONAH HEX #1
(Friday, November 4, 2005)
HOUSE OF M #8
(Thursday, November 3, 2005)
YOUNG AVENGERS #8
(Friday, October 28, 2005)
JLA #121
(Thursday, October 27, 2005)
JUSTICE #2
(Friday, October 21, 2005)
SHE-HULK VOL. 2 #1
(Friday, October 21, 2005)
INFINITE CRISIS #1
(Friday, October 14, 2005)
HOUSE OF M #7
(Thursday, October 13, 2005)
Comicscape - October 5, 2005
(Wednesday, October 5, 2005)
VIGILANTE #1
(Friday, September 30, 2005)
Fandango Logo
Comments/Responses
1 2 > >>
• Sep 09, 2005, 04:46am •
Nice just buy issue 1 then dump the next issue. Go for the trade unless you are a die hard core GR fan.

• Sep 09, 2005, 06:51am •
It also seems a bit premature to call a movie "crapariffic" before it has been released.

• Sep 09, 2005, 07:02am •
i agree with you yotaruvegeta. why would al brown call this movie a crap way before it came out. i mean he hasnt even seen the previews yet to assume its going to be crap. unless he's seen something that we havent seen. i would like to hear al brown explain why he would think its going to be crap. i know it being pg-13 instead of it being rated r sucks. but man wait to you at least see the previews of the movie before judging it.

• Sep 09, 2005, 08:18am •
Man, I think Al Brown (editorialist) needs to take some vacation time! Sounds like he has a major axe to grind with Ghost Rider or Mark Steven Johnson or Marvel!

• Sep 09, 2005, 08:56am •
Nillum, Al Brown isn't the only one who has issues with Mark Steven Johnson. I mean, Daredevil was one of the crappiest, worst piece of crap movie of the last 50 years and he completelly destroyed the character. Even worst, to cast Ben affleck in this movie was even worst then the movie itself.

I like GR and Marvel but, let's just say that the Daredevil franchise is dead and it's better this way. Heck, think about it, if Marvel decided to do Elektra instead of a second Daredevil, that's a sign (which the movie sucked also, it had potential and they didn't use it).

• Sep 09, 2005, 10:01am •
Who defends Mark Steven Johnson? Man, that's just perverse. That's like defending leeches. I'm sure you could think of an argument for them, but why bother?

Here's what Johnson has directed:
Elektra
Daredevil
Simon Birch
That means - and this is empirically proveable - that Johnson has never created a single minute of film that didn't suck. Throw in the fact that he wrote both "Grumpy Old Men" movies, and I don't see how anyone can argue that Ghost Rider has a prayer.

Nillum, it's just Johnson that I have an axe to grind with. (And yeah, it's a big one, because he keeps ruining movies that I was hoping wouldn't suck!) I love Ghost Rider, and I even love Marvel, although we're currently in counseling.

Now, if you happen to be one of the four people who liked either Daredevil or Elektra (I won't include Simon Birch here, because - literally - zero people liked that), more power to you, and maybe you'll like Ghost Rider too. I, however, did not and will not. And it's a shame.

Ghost Rider's gonna be tough to do a movie of anyway - dude's got a flaming skull for a head, c'mon now - but if I had a dream director, it'd be Wes Craven. Seriously, I think he'd do a cool job.

• Sep 09, 2005, 10:12am •
I think Al Brown's journalist integrety just went down the sh*tter. It's ok for you and I make comments like that before even seeing a preview, but I expect from a professional journalist/critic.

That being said, as a fan, though, I have say that Johnston totally destroyed the DD franchise even before it had a chance. Look at the guy's resume! He had never directed an action movie before DD, and especially a dark one at that! Why are they giving this a chance at ruining yet another great dark action hero?

• Sep 09, 2005, 10:14am •
you know al brown alot of the things you said made sense. but im still going to give ghost rider a shot i rather wait and see. i think the only director i will never give another shot after i went to see that piece of crap house of the dead and rented alone in the dark is uwe boll. now that has to be one of the worst directors out there. but wes craven hmmmmmmmmmmmmm doing ghost rider hmmmmmmmmm making it a R rating. i like it, i like it alot. but its in our dreams now. but like i said im still going to check this one out. but thats just me,I dont expect anyone to agree with me.

• Sep 09, 2005, 10:39am •
I guess I'm with you Tylon316, I will probably go see GR but, I'm having a lot of doubts with this.

Maybe some people deserves lots of chances until they finally fo something good so, maybe it will turn out good but, not holding my breath on this.

• Sep 09, 2005, 10:40am •
Wow. I had journalist integrity? Cool. *grin*

1 2 > >>
Login to post a comment!