Movie Review
18 Comments | Add a Comment

4


"Ghost Rider"

By: Abbie Bernstein
Date: Monday, February 19, 2007

Ghost Rider is a bit of a conundrum, full of grim mythology but with a pretty upbeat, quasi-humorous tone. With almost everybody involved on the same page, the results are enjoyable. 

Nicolas Cage plays the adult Johnny Blaze, a professional daredevil harboring a secret. When he was a teenager (Matt Long), Johnny made a deal with the Devil (Peter Fonda) that backfired. Johnny has been trying to disprove the idea that he’s damned ever since, but now the Devil has come to collect. Johnny is tagged as the new Ghost Rider, a kind of bounty hunter for Hell who by night is a fiery skeleton riding on a flaming motorcycle, with an internal evil detector that allows him to find bad souls. 

Actually, Johnny has a specific mission right now: he’s to prevent the Devil’s son Blackheart (Wes Bentley) from getting hold of the contract of San Berganza, which will enable Junior to take over the world. This seems vaguely familiar from Constantine, but fortunately, Ghost Rider doesn’t bang us over the head with metaphysical musings. Writer/director Mark Steven Johnson manages to work in both incarnations of the Marvel Comics hero – Western version (that Sam Elliott voiceover at the top eventually pays off) and ‘70s biker – to good effect. Speaking of good effects, there’s a lot of CGI here. There’s fun to be had with the morphing back and forth between human and flaming skull, or, for the more demonic characters, humanish and skeleton-like, and it’s used in a way that doesn’t really impede the action. Johnson succumbs to the urge to show too many reaction shots from civilians (yes, we know, this looks freaky to people, you can resume the story/action now), and he’s got an extra story beat or two in there, but for the most part, the pace is sprightly. 

Cage plays much of Johnny with a modest air of abashed, hesitant astonishment that is well-modulated and quite funny. He makes the character not only someone we can empathize with, but someone who empathizes with us – the movie never breaks the fourth wall, but there’s a sense that we’re being shown, “Hey, if you find this a tall tale, imagine how Johnny feels!” 

Fonda is swell casting as the ultra-cool master of the uneasy rider and Elliott is the epitome of all that is Western. Donal Logue scores as Johnny’s devoted chief roadie and Eva Mendes does all she can with the role of Johnny’s reporter true love. Only Bentley seems a little too arch for the proceedings – his Blackheart is mean but lacks the sense of personal menace conjured by Fonda. For that matter, we’re never clear on some of the rules at play here, including why Hell’s First Father and Son are choosing this moment in time to have their faceoff. 

Even so, the idea of literally burning rubber as the bike streaks around, the righteous ass-kicking and Cage’s air of someone tentatively engaging in a necessary but questionable task are all enough to create appeal for fans of decent comic book-based films.



User Reviews
Comments/Responses
1 2 > >>
Wiggley • Feb 19, 2007, 07:51am •
Hmmmmmm, not the horrible review I expected. Maybe I shall make the theatre to see instead of waiting for DVD.

celt6 • Feb 19, 2007, 09:00am •
A fair review. i saw this opening night, after waiting anxiously for 7 months. Ghost Rider was always my #2 comic character, so I was very excited, and very fearful that it would get botched like so many other previous comic movies (Mark Steven Johnson's outing for Daredevil among others).

I pretty much agree with Abbie's review, but for the point about it being long. I thought it could have been longer, and in fact SHOULD have been. The fight scenes were abrupt to say the least. Ghost Rider seemed to learn his powers and figure out how to defeat each threat in record time, leaving each combat scene feeling like a big tease.

Furthermore, the character development was felt abbreviated as well. It was like the filmmakers laid a fantastic foundation of a movie, and never really built anything on it.

All in all, I agree with the "B" rating. I'd like to say I hope the sequel will take this film and build something really exciting and meaningful on it, but I don't realistically see this one earning a sequel.

I recommend all you comic-reading Maniacs go check this out.

themovielord • Feb 19, 2007, 09:08am •
Check out my review as well MANIACS! I think it was a good start like the Fantastic Four. I wasn't wowed but I wasn't disappointed either.

20105 • Feb 19, 2007, 10:29am •
Celt6, You agree with the "B" rating. Why don't you realistically see this one earning a sequel?

kaybar • Feb 19, 2007, 10:54am •
movielord where's your review, in your blog?

momitchell7 • Feb 19, 2007, 11:28am •
I saw it this weekend and thought that it was simply okay... I definitely don't see it having any "Mass" appeal, comic book fans should have a good time. People were cracking up after the movie to the tune of "Did I really just watch that corny film?"

For what it's worth... I didn't expect much and that's about what I got.

daforce • Feb 19, 2007, 12:41pm •
Wow. Obviously a lot of people's tolerance for really bad acting has reached an all time high. This movie was horrible. There were no explanations for a lot of things (why does Blackheart mysteriously appear out in the middle of the desert, for example), and the Ghost Rider curse was treated more with glee (as in a 'hey kids, it's fun to be cursed') than dread.
None of the evil characters are anywhere near threatening (I've seen kittens that have been more terrifying than Peter Fonda in this movie), and the main characters couldn't act their way out of a wet paper bag given a chainsaw, a blowtorch, 10 years of acting lessons, and a battalion of Marines.

Anyway, you can read my review of it here:
http://www.mania.com/member-reviews/0/92.html


Merin • Feb 19, 2007, 04:39pm •
I appreciate Abbie's review and agree with it. I'd give it a B+, and it's lacking an A from me because there are some plot holes (the aforementioned "why is this happening now" a big one) and for the moments of goofiness (not every comic book / super-hero movie needs one-liners and moments to make you chuckle, really.)
The acting was pretty good for the material, and it is a little better than I expected. I didn't go in expecting much, granted, but when a film entertains me completely and fails to disappoint me, then it has done its job well.

Thanks, Abbie, for the good review.

muchdrama • Feb 19, 2007, 07:31pm •
A "B"? You gave this film a "B"? Apparently you didn't see the same film I did...full to the brim with bad script, bad acting (even Cage), and bad everything else except maybe the special effects.

Easily the worst superhero flick ever made.

Terrible. "F".

tbones420 • Feb 19, 2007, 10:09pm •
^^^actually, its called difference in taste and opinion :)

1 2 > >>
Login to post a comment!