Movie News


GHOSTBUSTERS IN HELL Where Hell = NY?

By: Karl Schneider
Date: Wednesday, May 17, 2006
Source: InFocus magazine

Well, if you like math then that title was fun for you. I hate math, and hate myself for writing such garbage. I could go on writing dribble, but I figure it is best to just give you the news before you cry for my head.

To be fair, this was all a sorry attempt to get you to mosey on to another story. If you are still with me, please know that reading any further will prove that God ... does in fact ... not exist. You have been warned.

InFocus Magazine has posted an interview of sorts with actor-filmmaker Harold Ramis. In the interview, Ramis had some sad news to report about the possibility of a third Ghostbusters. The report claims the movie would be titled Ghostbusters in Hell.

The script for the possible sequel is written by Dan Aykroyd and features a hell that looks like New York City. The Ghostbusters transport themselves to this Hell via a portal located in a warehouse. Are you sorry you read this yet? Wait ... it gets much worse.

"What Danny had originally conceived was sending us to a special-effects hell, a netherworld full of phenomenal visual environments and boiling pits," Ramis revealed. "But what works so well about the first two (films) is the mundane-ness of it all. So my notion was that hell exists in the same place as our consensus reality, but it's like a film shutter. It's the darkness between the 24 frames."

Yes Harold. Yes it is.

Ramis continued, "So we create a device to do it, and it's in a warehouse in Brooklyn. When we step out of the chamber, it looks just like New York, but it's hell. Everything's grid-locked; no cars are moving and all the drivers are swearing at each other in different foreign languages. No two people speak the same language. It's all the worst things about modern urban life, just magnified."


Sigh. I have done all I can. I have held off as long as possible. If you are still reading ... then you simply asked for it.

Reports are saying Ramis wants vets Aykroyd, Moranis and Murray to reprise their roles. Murray refuses to, probably because he got a whiff of the script's smell. In his place Ramis is reportedly trying to cast Ben Stiller to star as the new Ghostbuster.

I am going to the corner to cry. I just want to thank Tim, who sent me this scoop, for ruining my life. Just kidding, I appreciate it ... really.

More Content By Karl Schneider
Dark Knight, The
(Tuesday, May 29, 2007)
"Crank" sequel on the way
(Monday, April 30, 2007)
Carter Smith to direct "Come Closer"
(Monday, April 30, 2007)
Darren Aronofksy talks "Noah"
(Monday, April 30, 2007)
Lambert Wilson joins two films
(Monday, April 30, 2007)
Madonna and Guy Oseary producing "Digger"
(Monday, April 30, 2007)
Ridley Scott to direct "Nottingham"
(Monday, April 30, 2007)
"Everyone's Hero" Contest Winners
(Friday, April 27, 2007)
Blockbuster’s Ultimate Entertainment Experience Contest Winner
(Friday, April 27, 2007)
David Goyer will direct "Magneto"
(Friday, April 27, 2007)
Fandango Logo
Comments/Responses
1 2 3 4 > >>
• May 17, 2006, 02:22am •
Sweat Hell in a Hand-Basket!!!!

First it gets my hopes up for GB3, then, it dashes them with a really, really bad story-line, and even worse, BEN STILLER REPLACING BILL MURRAY!?

...*BREATH, BREATH, BREATH*...

This has to be a major hoax... cause if Aykroyd wrote such... I'll break his fingers into 28 individual peices and make him eat them... (j/k)

mckracken • May 17, 2006, 02:49am •
Bill and Ted Bogus Adventures...

its been done before. oh and recast Slimer for Murray, nobody will notice let alone care.

• May 17, 2006, 03:41am •
Bill Murray refused to do another Ghostbusters movie LONG before this proposal came about. Dan Aykroyd has been vying to do another one as much as Richard Hatch wanted to relaunch Battlestar Galactica over the years past.

The concept doesn't sound THAT bad, but I view it as more of a fun short gag than what to build a film around. And to be honest, I have yet to see Ghostbusters 2 (and sadly, I think I own it).

Ah well. If a Ghostbusters 3 happens, you won't see Bill Murray in it... but I can live with Ben Stiller in it, he's why I watch "Dodgeball" every so often.

And for the record, I still believe God exists.

• May 17, 2006, 03:56am •
I hope that Ramis works with Aykroyd on the script (if there is one). The script has to be air tight for it to work in this day and age. With shows like Lost, 24, and House, we're getting used to better writing... and comedy is even harder to do. If the script isn't as good (if not better) than say Pirates of the Caribbean, ya gotta get those writers to help out too. Dan and Harold are still cool no matter what they turn out; we'll never forget the eighties.

coldhardtruth • May 17, 2006, 04:03am •
Pathetic.

• May 17, 2006, 05:35am •
browbeat, I agree. The story sounds good. It doesn't take too much imagination to see what they're getting at. I hope it goes forward.

videocide • May 17, 2006, 05:51am •
I always thought they were going to go with a new team of ghostbusters, located in a different city, with cameos by the orignal cast. oh well

• May 17, 2006, 06:28am •
Okay, it does sound a little stupid, but I have to give them credit for not just doing the exact same story again, as in Ghostbusters II (and redone again in Ivan Reitman's Evolution, aka Ghostbusters III with monsters).
Points given for something different for the franchise. Points taken away for a potentially disasterous concept.
Unfortunately, with Murray gone, I doubt it really matters. His dry wit and delivery was always the best part of the other movies.
So, points taken away to pointlessness without him.

• May 17, 2006, 06:49am •
Will someone please tell Dan Akroyd to stop... It's embarrassing watching him go out on stage with Jim ( I don't even have half the talent my brother had) Belushi as the Blues Brothers.. Just count your money from your House of Blues clubs and stay off the stage..
What's next Dr. Detroit 2..

corvin • May 17, 2006, 06:51am •
I would like to welcome the editors of Cinescape to Nov. 2005 offering the freshest news on the net. ;)

http://www.slashfilm.com/article.php/2005110623100936

1 2 3 4 > >>
Login to post a comment!