Movies Feature


A Golden Age of Horror?

By: Josh Gordon
Date: Friday, November 11, 2005

Let's play a little Password shall we?


Clues: Blech. Ugh. Egads. Oh No. Don't do it.


The correct answer is: Things you say when watching a horror film.


The problem is you often find yourself saying them for all the wrong reasons.


Here are some "not so good to bad" horror films I've seen recently (in no particular order):


The Cave (a mildly diversionary way to pass a couple of hours),
The Fog (Fog you! A total disaster and a waste of a great opportunity),
Boogeyman (An hour and a half of my life I'll never get back. Shame on you Sam Raimi),
Exorcist The Beginning (would have been kind of interesting if it didn't have the word Exorcist in the title)
Resident Evil II (Quite possibly the worst of the bunch. I can't believe I didn't walk out.)


Oh. The Horror.
BUT..
...things aren't as bad as they seem.

I'm always hearing horror fans talk about how many bad horror films there are.

I too find myself shaking my head in disbelief when I'm walking out of a movie like The Fog or Boogeyman thinking "Drats! Another terrible horror flick".

Let us horror fans try put this whole mishigas into perspective. Let me pose a question to you:

How many musicals and westerns have been made in the last ten years? Let's try and count 'em shall we? There's Chicago. Moulin Rouge. Phantom of the Opera and Open Range (forgive me if I missed one). Ok, so let's say we have four. Now granted, good things could maybe be said for all of them. Let's say musicals and westerns are batting a thousand in the quality department.


Let's also remember that the musical and the western were genres that not only defined American cinema in their day but have influenced filmmakers all over the world. TRIVIA: There were over TEN THOUSAND westerns made BEFORE the advent of sound. Realistically though both genres, for all intents and purposes, are extinct.

Horror survives everything. Sure we get Ghost Ship, the House On Haunted Hill remake, the 13 Ghosts Remake, The Fog remake, I Still Know What You Did Last Summer (you made a damn remake!), Boogeyman (should have been a no-make) but we are also blessed with some fantastic offerings.

Here's a list of what I feel are decent to excellent horror films of the last ten years (remember only four westerns and musicals in the same amount of time.):

Seven 1995*
Scream 1996*
Devil's Advocate 1997*
The Faculty 1998
Halloween H20 1998 (The best one since the original imho)
Ravenous (1999)*
Final Destination 2000 (The horror version of the classic Rube
Goldberg-esque board game Mouse Trap)
The Others 2001*
Jeepers Creepers (2001) (a respectable b-movie offering)
Dog Soldiers 2002
28 Days Later* 2002 (not a huge favorite of mine. I'm a fan of the first half of it but it re-invigorated and re-defined the zombie genre)
Cabin Fever* 2002
Ju-on* 2003
Ringu* 1998 the ring* 2003
Dawn of the Dead* 2004
Saw* 2005
Saw II* 2005 (get this. A sequel released in the same year as the original AND it's better! One for the history books my friends)
Shaun of the Dead* 2005
Land of the Dead* 2005 (What a ray of light it was to get a worthy successor to Dawn of the Dead after the sadly disappointing Day of the Dead. Some things are worth waiting for. Thanks George!)
Haut Tension* 2005
Constantine 2005 (a respectable b-movie offering dressed up like an A movie)
(* movies that, in my opinion, are particularly noteworthy)



That's twenty movies! Five times as many musicals and westerns combined!

The horror genre is notorious for producing bad movies and I find myself talking with friends lamenting how bad horror can be BUT we've gotten some gems and dare I say classics(?) among the stinkers. I dare, I dare.

The problem for us horror fans is that we go to see all of these cruddy pictures. Each time hoping beyond hope they'll be good.

The plain fact of the matter is that there isn't enough good horror to sate our ravenous desires but we should be grateful that horror is still alive and kicking and that we appear to be in a sort of "golden age" period with an unusually large amount of good horror coming our way. Just something to think about this the next time you think "Egads, another bad horror film".


More Content By Josh Gordon
Comments/Responses
1
snallygaster • Nov 11, 2005, 09:24am •
I have to call you out on a factual error first - the Saw movies were not released in 2005. The first Saw was released a couple weekends before Halloween in 2004, the second Saw released one weekend before Halloween 2005. So the sequel was slightly more than a year from the original, but definitely not released within the same year.

I'm not so sure I would say this is a Golden Age for horror films. I would say that what you present indicates that the horror genre is certainly thriving (unlike westerns and musicals), and that by the sheer volume of horror movies we are bound to get some winners among the drek. I would also say it indicates that horror is more diverse than it's ever been.

One major omission I noticed: Why no "Sixth Sense" among your list of best horror movies of the past 10 years? Do you not consider it as a horror movie, or was it simply an omission? Or has Shyamalan's stock dropped so far that we are now discounting his most memorable and influential movie? At the very least you can't overlook the influence of The Sixth Sense, as it almost single-handedly jump started the talking-with-the-dead subgenre (not just in movies but TV), as well as revived a desperate interest in the "twist ending," resulting in a lot of misfires but at least the scriptwriters are trying to surprise us again...

• Nov 11, 2005, 11:20am •
My belief is that so many horror movies get made because they'll EVENTUALLY make money. Formula: a new horror movie will have a $20-$30 million opening followed a week later by a 50% drop. Many theatrical-release horror movies will make their money back after the initial theater run. Add that to the fact that horror movies do great DVD sales and rentals and are favorites on cable and you've got millions in back end profits. So, as long as they keep making money, the studios will continue to spend $40-$50 million on horror movies...even if they're bad horror movies. And, every once in a while we get the added treat of an original idea or a fresh take on an old idea that we keep going to see the bad ones hoping for that next great horror movie.

• Nov 11, 2005, 02:52pm •
snallygaster:
Thanks for the correction about the Saw release dates. I was relating the release dates to events in my life and glitched it. Not an excuse but an explanation.

I think your statement "by the sheer volume of horror movies we are bound to get some winners among the drek" is right on the money.
While we haven't movies on a par with The Exorcist, Rosmary's Baby, or Halloween, I do believe some amazing horror has been produced lately. I think the pre-credit sequence in the Dawn of the Dead remake is some of the best horror ever made. The rest of the movie doesn't fall far behind. (NOTE: I have total reverence for the original. I saw it when I was about 14. Saw it six times in the theater. Wrote a term paper on it in High School.)
The Devil's Advocate has also become one of my favorite all time horror films. I won't go into why right now but there are many reasons.
While "golden age" might be a tad hyperbolic I really do believe that we're in a period of unusually good horror films. More than we've had in a very, very, long time. I find myself almost giddy with it.
Regarding your Sixth Sense comment, I found myself equally surprised that I hadn't thought of it. The truth is I've never considered it a horror film. It just didn't hit me that way while I was watching it but you're right, it is a horror film.
You can put that up there on the list!

Wessmith:
Yup. I agree. Believe me though that the studios aren't spending nearly $40-$50 million on these movies. I think most of them cost under $20 million.
The first Saw cost less than 5 mil, I think Boogeyman cost about 12 mil, and I think The Grudge cost about the same. I might be off a little bit but I'm in the ballpark.
At any rate your point is very true. Boogeyman took in about 16 million on it's opening weekend. With those kinds of cost to profit ratios we're bound for more shoddy offerings.

snallygaster • Nov 12, 2005, 11:15am •
Josh - I'm glad to see that your omission of The Sixth Sense was a simple oversight.

Yes, "Golden Age" is rather subjective, but I do agree that there has been an unusually high amount of quality horror movies in the past decade. But what I really like is the variety. The 1980s, for instance, will forever be known in horror circles as the Decade of the Slasher. Most of the horror movies which weren't slasher movies seemed to be Stephen King adaptations, or yet another cheap knock off of "Alien."

I think starting in the 1990s, the apparent burn out of the slasher movies left a void that was filled with a diversity of horror, usually kick-started by one movie. "Silence of the Lambs" demonstrated that serial killer movies aren't just for kids anymore. "The Sixth Sense," as I stated above, really brought back the return of the twist ending as well as intelligent supernatural thrillers. "Scream" revived the teen slasher movie, though thankfully not to the overbearing chokehold of the 1980s. "The Blair Witch Project" convinced studios that there was some big profit margins in cheap horror movies (whether you want to put the movie itself on your "best" or "worst" list is another question - though I rarely see it on neither). "The Ring" brought the Asian horror movie into Western pop culture. And, as you noted, "28 Days Later" ushered in a rennaissance of quality zombie movies.

I think it's also worth noting Dark Castle Entertainment, which specializes in producing theatrical horror movies. Granted, they have not yet produced a great horror movie, but the very fact that we have a brand name dedicated to horror movies shows that we are in a boom time for horror. I actually liked "House of Wax" (in spite of the presense of Ms. Hilton) and "Ghost Ship" as solid B-movies - and the prologue of "Ghost Ship" was one of the most disturbing horror film moments in recent years.

1
Login to post a comment!