Hollywood News


Golden Globes Seek Deal with WGA

By: Jarrod Sarafin, News Editor
Date: Thursday, January 03, 2008
Source: HFPA, WGA,

It seems that another group is seeking an interim agreement with the WGA even if AMPTP continues playing "hard ball" outside of their bargaining room. The SAG Awards grabbed a deal early on to have WGA's stamp of approval for their award show though it should be noted they sought their interim deal long before the current strike mess. When some late night talk show hosts announced their imminent return to the airwaves (sans writers), late-night-host David Letterman decided to strike up an official deal with the WGA through his company Worldwide Pants so his two talk shows, his show and the later broadcast of Craig Ferguson, would have WGA writers on board. Letterman's actions seem to have inspired the HFPA judging by their latest statement but it may not find the same net results as you will see below.

Here's the statement that HFPA (Hollywood Foreign Press Association) President Jorge Camara gave out yesterday, which says that they are seeking an interim deal with the WGA so they can provide The Golden Globes in just 10 days...

I am happy to announce that on Saturday morning, December 29, 2007, our attorneys began discussions with the Writers Guild of America to enter into an interim agreement similar to that entered into by the WGA and Worldwide Pants, which permits writers guild members to go back to work writing for "The Late Show with David Letterman." We feel that the "Late Show with David Letterman" agreement is very reasonable, and hope and expect the WGA will agree to the same terms and ultimately permit the "Golden Globe Awards" to be broadcast as scheduled, without picket lines, on Sunday, January 13.



We are pleased that the WGA has made interim agreements available for independent production companies. The process established by the WGA permits writers to get back to work, grants the WGA the rights it is seeking on behalf of all writers, and allows certain shows to move forward. The "Late Show with David Letterman" and the "Golden Globe Awards" are similar in structure and are administered in the same way. Worldwide Pants produces "The Late Show with David Letterman" for broadcast on behalf of David Letterman, Dick Clark Productions produces the "Golden Globe Awards" for broadcast on behalf of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association. CBS does not own "Late Show with David Letterman," and NBC does not own the "Golden Globe Awards."

We strongly support the WGA and the efforts they are making on behalf of writers, and applaud the fact that they have agreed to allow certain industry awards shows to move forward with WGA writers and be broadcast. Much like the Screen Actors Guild Awards and Film Independent's Spirit Awards, we want to enter into an agreement with the WGA that will allow the entertainment industry to celebrate the outstanding work of creative individuals in addition to millions of fans nationwide. It is only fair that we be afforded the same opportunity as these other awards shows.

What's more, our partners at Dick Clark Productions share in our support of the WGA and their efforts and have agreed to enter into interim agreements for all of their productions, including the "American Music Awards," "Dick Clark's New Year's Rockin' Eve" and "The Academy of Country Music Awards," among others.

An interim agreement with the WGA will also help numerous schools and entertainment industry non-profit organizations receive annual donations from the HFPA. Over the last several years the HFPA has contributed approximately $8 million to organizations including The Film Foundation, Sundance Institute, Film Independent, American Cinematheque and schools including USC, UCLA, and Cal Arts. All of these programs will be severely impacted without the funds made available as a direct result of the Golden Globe Awards broadcast.

Sounds good, right? What's the problem?

Well, Mr. Camara may have bit off more than he can chew by releasing this statement judging by reactions inside the WGA community, people who don't see eye-to-eye with Camara's statement of the Globes being anywhere close to groups like the SAGs and Worldwide Pants. In the latest news over at Hollywood Reporter, you can see that HFPA may not get that deal even when the show is only 10 days away. Basically, the guilds are very pessimistic on a 11th hour reprieve for the Globes and surprised by Mr. Camara's confidence in the statement above..

The writers guilds, though, seemed taken aback by the announcement. Asked on the picket line outside "The Late Show with Conan O'Brien" about the HFPA missive, WGA East president Michael Winship seemed almost surprised about the contents of the letter. "There have been some informal conversations but really nothing more than that," he told The Hollywood Reporter.

The WGA West followed soon after with a statement that also sought to put distance between itself and the HFPA letter. "Dick Clark Productions is a struck company. As previously announced, the Writers Guild will be picketing the Golden Globe Awards," it said.










 

 


More Content By Jarrod Sarafin, News Editor
Agent Zero & Barnell Revealed for WOLVERINE
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Amazon Producing Fantasy CHILD
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Cameron Updates Status on AVATAR
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Doomed JLA, More Mutants & Ant Man!
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
First Bloody Pic from LOST BOYS 2
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
IRON MAN Trailer Debuts on Feb 28 Lost
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
New Victims Ready for FINAL DESTINATION 4
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Two More Gangsters for Mann's ENEMIES
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Weaving Tracks After the WOLFMAN
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
BIONIC WOMAN Officially Axed by NBC?
(Thursday, February 21, 2008)
Fandango Logo
Comments/Responses
1
smegforbrain • Jan 03, 2008, 05:53am •
It's already being reported elsewhere (ComingSoon.net) through an official WGA statement that there will be no deal with the Golden Globes:

"Dick Clark Productions is a struck company. As previously announced, the Writers Guild will be picketing the Golden Globe Awards."

Merin • Jan 03, 2008, 08:22am •
This is beginning to feel like that Babylon 5 episode - only we don't have a Commander Sinclair to reappropriate the military budget!
Huh - you think GWB will reallocate some Pentagon money to bolster union workers' pay? Wait, these are writers, and Bush doesn't read. Dang.

Awards shows are stupid anyway. They should just do announcements of winners.

lincolnparadox • Jan 03, 2008, 08:24am •

I suppose that they could do a decent awards show in 11 days. It's mostly jokes and banter wrapped around some research on the nominees for each award.

I guess there will just be less jokes, ad-libbed banter, and Wikipedia or IMDB for the rest.

wessmith1966 • Jan 03, 2008, 09:48am •
Either you're on strike on you're not. I think it's BS that individual deals could be worked out for certain shows or events. I'm not an expert on unions, but if management knows it can work individual deals, why wouldn't they hold out and try to break the union or circumvent the union altogether and work out individual deals for every show? How will the writers walking the lines feel about the ones who cross the lines to work on individual shows? I know I'd be pretty pissed. My dad was a steelworker and I can remember how he and his coworkers felt about guys who crossed.

rgtchtiger • Jan 03, 2008, 10:57am •
I just saw an article on MSN that the deal was nixed. Honestly I agree with wessmith that either the WGA is balls-out striking or it's not. Making exceptions here and there for awards shows and late-night talk shows could be interpreted by the studios that the WGA's back is bending and could concede some of their demands in order to get back to work.

DarkJedi • Jan 03, 2008, 01:24pm •
Smeg..Rgt,

Did you check out the Hollywood Reporter article linked at the bottom of the article? That's the whole "deal nixed" piece that CS and MSN took from..

As I said it in line below the title..They may seek a compromise but it's not going to happen here. Mr. Camara bit off more then he can chew with that statement.

Merin • Jan 03, 2008, 02:56pm •
The "individual deals" are the Union contracting with businesses asking for their workers.

Unionized nurses, for example, work for MANY different hospitals. If one hospital offered a striking union a deal that was good enough to satisfy the needs of the nurses, then those striking nurses from said hospital would go back to work.

Letterman's company made its own contract negotiations with the WGA, and thus the unionized writers can work for Letterman's company without breaking the strike.

Saying you have to boycott the companies that are willing to deal with you just because there are other companies who are unwilling to deal with you is ridiculous.

wessmith1966, you have to think about this. The WGA made a deal with Letterman's company. They are not crossing a strike line to work for Letterman because, once the deal was agreed upon, they were no longer striking against Letterman's company.

michaelxaviermaelstrom • Jan 03, 2008, 03:36pm •
The way I see it, the WGA went for the deal primarily because Letterman's WWP agreed to their contract terms.

The same contract terms that the AMPTP rejected.

The more companies that do that, the more the AMPTP's argument is weakened.

It may not have a direct bearing on what the AMPTP do, but it is an important public precedent in support of the WGA.

You can see from the GG admin letter, that it also has the effect of leading to other companies publicly stating their support for the WGA's position.

re: "We strongly support the WGA and the efforts they are making on behalf of writers"
as seen in the letter above.

That also serves to goose the elephant in the room, to put a chink in the `climate of fear' that subcutaneously surrounds this issue. People are looking around, wondering if they should speak up against the megacorporation's position publicly, when they see others doing it, the fear is reduced a bit.

At this point in time, it's probs nothing more than a sideline moral-support issue more than anything else, but it could conceivably snowball into more public support for the WGA, which in turn would put more pressure on the individual corporate members of the AMPTP to at least consider that "maybe" the AMPTP's position isn't as solid as they'd been led to believe.

Possibly in turn leading to at least one megacorp disconnecting from the AMPTP position.

moral-support is not likely as loud a msg to the megacorporations as losing money would be, but it seems an OK start. to me.

mXm

1
Login to post a comment!