Movie Review


HAIRSPRAY

By: Abbie Bernstein
Review Date: Friday, July 20, 2007

This reviewer is not a pushover for movie musicals – don’t lynch me, but not only didn’t I like The Producers, I didn’t like Grease. However, Hairspray – which, like The Producers, has the pedigree of being a non-musical film comedy transformed into a hit Broadway show reconceived for the big screen with song – is utterly winning. Director Adam Shankman and screenwriter Leslie Dixon, working from the stage musical book by Mark O’Donnell & Thomas Meehan, who in turn based their work on the movie written and directed by John Waters – Marc Shaiman wrote the music and collaborated with Scott Wittman on the lyrics for both the Broadway and new film versions – avoid confusing innocence with idiocy. There are a lot of big themes running through the film, but they’re handled with a kind of deft exuberance that leaves you laughing breathless in the wake of the characters’ verve and joy, rather than laughing at their stupidity.
 
We’re in 1963 Baltimore, where white teenager Tracy Turnblad (Nikki Blonsky) is, like most of the kids in town, crazy about the afternoon TV dance craze, The Corny Collins Show. Nikki is constantly getting put in detention, usually because of things like “inappropriate hair height,” but this is fine with her, as it allows her to pick up cool dance moves from black fellow detainees, some of whom are regulars on the once-monthly Collins Show “Negro Day.” Tracy would love to see her favorite show integrated – more, she’d love to be a dancer on the Corny show herself. Tracy gets her chance when there are auditions for an open spot on the show, but station manager Velma Von Tussle (Michelle Pfeiffer) hates heavy people (Tracy is large) almost as much as she hates suggestive dance moves and integrationists. Nikki is getting conflicting messages at home – Mom Edna (John Travolta) is afraid Nikki will have her dreams crushed, but dad Wilbur tells Tracy to “go for it.” Tracy starts to realize that the black friends she so admires are being squelched creatively (and in other ways), and joins a protest march – which causes her to become a wanted fugitive.
 
This is all handled with the kind of high spirits normally associated with the late ‘50s/early ‘60s, outlining the feel of the era without feeling either too preachy or too nonchalant – points are made in the flow of events, rather than with declamations. Tracy’s opening embrace of her hometown as Blonsky sings “Good Morning, Baltimore” is delighted by everything around her – the people, the shops, the neighborhood flasher (played in a cameo by Waters, of course). She is a perfect musical comedy heroine – unpretentious yet unbreakable. Blonsky has a huge, soaring voice and impressive dance moves, along with an upbeat attitude that makes Nikki a joyous focal point.
 
For those late to the party wondering why Travolta is playing Nikki’s (or anybody’s) mother, it should be known that Edna has always been played by a man – the late Divine in the original Waters film and Harvey Fierstein in the original Broadway production. Travolta, in prosthetics and a body suit, dives into Edna’s fussy vulnerability with gusto, and Walken gives Wilbur a spacey warmth, genial and fleet of foot (a dance number reminds us that Walken has in his day been a song and dance man). Marsden as show host Corny Collins seems at home as a preening yet decent teen idol, Pfeiffer seems to have a blast as the vampy, vicious Velma and Amanda Bynes is a little reminiscent of P.J. Soles (of Halloween and Hollywood High School) as Tracy’s sheltered but blossoming best friend. Elijah Kelley has pizzazz as young dancer Seaweed, while Queen Latifah has dignity (if not the implied rapid speech) of Seaweed’s mother, deejay Motormouth Maybelle.
 
Director Shankman has spent years as a choreographer (he may be best known to TV viewers for his work on the musical episode of Buffy), and his experience with the form pays off here. He knows not only how to move his dancers but where to put the camera for best effect, so that there’s of kinetic energy in sync with the song score, rather than just that “movement goes here” sense that some film musicals bring to the dance numbers. He also modulates the tone really well, making scenes amusing without either hitting them too hard or making them overly camp. Unlike a lot of filmmakers referring back to the ‘50s/’60s in comedic terms, Shankman, Dixon, Shaiman and Wittman love their characters – they don’t feel superior to them and want us to feel part of the action, not above it. Hairspray is deliciously inclusive, not only within its storyline, but with its audience. It’s something to celebrate.



More From Mania

And the 2008 MTV Movie Award Nominations are...

BOURNE Packs Punch at B.O.
(Sunday, August 5, 2007)
The SIMPSONS Dominate Box Office
(Sunday, July 29, 2007)
I Now Pronounce You a Victory
(Sunday, July 22, 2007)
Seed of Chucky
(Friday, June 4, 2004)
SEED OF CHUCKY gets rolling
(Tuesday, March 16, 2004)
Music To Be Abducted By
(Thursday, January 29, 2004)

See more related content
More Content By Abbie Bernstein
THE STRANGERS
(Friday, May 30, 2008)
IRON MAN
(Friday, May 2, 2008)
PROM NIGHT
(Saturday, April 12, 2008)
THE RUINS
(Friday, April 4, 2008)
AMERICAN ZOMBIE
(Saturday, March 29, 2008)
FUNNY GAMES
(Friday, March 14, 2008)
CJ7
(Friday, March 7, 2008)
10,000 B.C
(Thursday, March 6, 2008)
PENELOPE
(Friday, February 29, 2008)
VANTAGE POINT
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Comments/Responses
1 2 > >>
LivinLaw • Jul 20, 2007, 02:26am •
Although I am a fan of movie (and live) musicals, I had to second your opinion regarding The Producers. I couldn't even make it more than 30 minutes into the movie without turning it off. I just found the entire presentation (both performances and choreography) to be completely cheesy and over the top. And this is coming from someone who recognizes and generally embraces the inherent absurdity of the musical genre. But hey, different strokes for different folks right?

Needless to say, I'm really looking forward to Hairspray. I really enjoy the score and can't wait to see how it looks on the big screen.

gauleyboy420 • Jul 20, 2007, 12:05pm •
THIS MOVIE SHOUD NEVER HAVE BEEN REMADE!
I don't know how much John Waters had to do with the remake, but unless he rewrote it, Directed and produced it IT IS BLASPHEMY!
There is nothing wrong with the original, It's one of most proggresive, and funniest damn movies ever!
"But I don't wanna watch an old movie" (in a whining techofile voice)
IT'S IN COLOR for you pukes who don't wanna watch a Black and white movie.
Yes the original isn't high def, it's dirty, grungy, LOW BUDGET! Well if you've ever been to Baltimore it is too.
This trend of remaking movies needs to be reigned in. I have nothing against a director wanting to remake a 75 year old classic that people might not be able to find, BUT THIS MOVIE WAS ONLY 20 years old (roughly)
I Feel that now no one will go back and watch the original masterpiece, because they have this crisp, cleaned up, with great sound, version THEYRE MISSING OUT AND DOING JOHN WATERS A DISSERVICE.
Fuck this BULL SHIT!
GO watch a classic, Not a crappy remake of a classic.
This isn't an instance of we didn't have the technology to make this good in the 70's

NO MATTER HOW GOOD THIS FLICK MIGHT BE,ITS NOTHING COMPARED TO THE ORIGINAL!

THIS REMAKE IS UNESSESARY MONEY GRUBBING BY THE HOLLYWOOD THAT HAS SHUNED WATERS FOR YEARS.
AND ANYONE WHO WANTS TO SEE THIS NEEDS TO WATCH THE ONE and ONLY HAIRSPRAY, NOT THIS SHIT,
I don't care how good a review it gets, Hairspray should not be what this movie is, a clean big budget, Travolta in a fat suit nightmare, pandering to all the stoopids out there. There is nothing wrong with a classic,
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

GOOD DAY!
I SAID GOOD DAY SIR!

MIkeTheEditor • Jul 20, 2007, 01:18pm •
You want to know what John Waters thinks of the stage ANd the movie musical?

He LOVES them.


I love people that start transhing things before they've even seen them.

Both productions were done with Water's blessing and support so if he has no issues with it, then neither should anyone else.

If you want to read about it in his own words, check out this interview:

http://www.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/custom/modernlife/bal-waters0719,0,2320595.story

Oh - and you might go on and just pull the covers over your head, because Crybaby, The Musical, is headed for Broadway next...

nax37 • Jul 20, 2007, 01:23pm •
Regardless of Waters' involvement, who cares if a movie is remade? If you don't want to watch anything but the original, don't watch it! A remake does nothing to cheapen the original. Even if everyone else on Earth says the remake is better than the original, it shouldn't change how you feel about the original.

gauleyboy420 • Jul 20, 2007, 02:14pm •
I f ing read where Waters said he liked the remake, I'm sure he liked the payday more than the film. I have no problem with these movies going to broadway, but why does that instantly equal a remake of the reason it went to Broadway. BFD
AND nax it does cheapen the original in the way that most people who never saw it never will. Theye will just ssee a watered down clean cookie cutter version. It definately takes away from the original
If they needed to make more $$$ off of this movie they should have digitally restored it and re-released it. I bet waters would have liked that more.
Oh yeah, I can tell neither of you have been to baltimore. Just like the stars that snubbed the opening this remake has NO HEART!
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
p.s. There is a very telling part of that interview where Waters states " I mean, if I had hated it, I wouldn't have bitched about it."
ergo we don't really know what he thinks about it.

audioslave69 • Jul 20, 2007, 02:18pm •
i second that nax, i hate fans when they get to personal when something they love gets remade,in my opinion they are scared that the remake will be better the the old one.
the way i see it its somehow good to make remakes. Why? well cuz it introduces older movies younger people that even thou they know they exist they will never go back and watch the originals just because they are old.
So i give thumbs up for remakes, they cant always be good, but u dont have to go see them either.

gauleyboy420 • Jul 20, 2007, 02:22pm •
LOOK F'ers
I STATED I HAVE NOTHING AGAINST REMAKES,
HOWEVER
SOME MOVIES SHOULD"N BE REMADE.
This is one of them.
There are viceral qualities that made this movie great that can't be recreated.

gauleyboy420 • Jul 20, 2007, 02:25pm •
While we're at it lets remake
Willow
Spiderman
StarWars (again)
Ghostbusters
Dark Crystal
40 year old virgin
Slapshot
ect...
Where does it end
Lets force hollywood to be creative
You can say there is no originality, FINE you may be right

BUT I disagree, it's just not as easy to be creative and original, as it is to regurgitate old ideas. If you argue with me on this point you'll only prove me right.

nax37 • Jul 20, 2007, 05:11pm •
Not real sure how you're able to tell where have visited based on a message board post, but you're not very good at it. I live in Aberdeen. My girlfriend grew up right off of Belair road. We go into the city almost every weekend. But anyway.

A remake doesn't (or at least shouldn't) cheapen the original FOR YOU. YOU still saw it and enjoyed it. If you watch it next month, you should still enjoy it just as much, no matter how many plays and remakes they make.

Oh, and how about not screaming at other posters and calling us F'ers. It's not very nice.

gauleyboy420 • Jul 20, 2007, 05:31pm •
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
I told you a remake keeps people from watching the original (In most cases)
THERFORE, IT TAKES AWAY THE ORIGINAL ARTIST VISION AND REPLACES IT WITH A CHEAP (or big budget) IMITATION.
SORRY BOUT THE F'ERS (BUT NOT THE YELLING)
THIS IS MY SOAPBOX, I'VE BEEN ANGRY ABOUT UNEEDED REMAKES FOR A WHILE, AND THIS ONE BROKE THE CAMELS BACK!
IF YOU GO INTO BALTIMORE WEEKLEY, THEN Y... oh still yelling, sorry
If you go intto the city regularly then you realize that a clean crisp vision of Baltimore is not true, Waters vision depicts Balimore (reginal dialect) waaay better than any other (except maybe that show on HBO that I can't remember the name of right now but it's really good)(it's about cops in Balimore)
That interview with Waters was SAD!
You can tell he doesn't really want to talk about the new movie, and most of the interview he is talking about the original and other movies.

C'mon where the solid argument about how remakes are creative, and how they don't do us a disservice.
Sure movies have been adapted from other sources since the beginning of movies, so how about we find a new source, why not
BECAUSE HOLLYWOOD IS TOO SCARED TO TAKE CHANCES,AND TOO LAZY TO BE CREATIVE!

1 2 > >>
Login to post a comment!