Movie Review

Send to a Friend



To: (email)


To: (name)


From: (name)


Message:



"Hannibal Rising"

By: Abbie Bernstein
Review Date: Friday, February 09, 2007

Taken on its own terms as a standalone, Hannibal Rising is a decent, baroque revenge thriller with a sense of icy rage to it – the recipients of the main character’s wrath are so heinous that most viewers this side of Gandhi will feel some sympathy for Hannibal’s anger, though his methods are a more than a bit out there. It’s questionable that the film’s main flaw can actually be called a flaw, since it’s not a problem unless you want to put Hannibal Rising in continuity with the rest of the films involving Hannibal Lecter: Manhunter, with Brian Cox as the imprisoned, brilliant cannibal/serial killer/psychiatrist, then the more famous Oscar-winning Silence of the Lambs, its sequel Hannibal and the Manhunter remake Red Dragon, all with Anthony Hopkins in the role. 

Hannibal Rising gives us Hannibal Lecter as a child and as a young man, the latter played by Gaspard Ulliel. We get the background on why he’s so emotionally disconnected – though he’s certain in touch with his inner fury here – and why he feels eating his enemies is appropriate. During WWII, eight-year-old Hannibal (Aaran Thomas) and his even younger sister Mischa (Helena-Lia Tachovska) are first orphaned by a bombing raid, then taken prisoner by a rogue company of Lithuanian SS men, who do something so awful that for awhile, Hannibal blanks it from memory. Eight years later, he begins to recall what happened, escapes the bleak orphanage where he’s being kept (after exacting fatal retaliation on the in-house bully) and heads on foot to France, where his uncle’s Japanese widow, Lady Murasaki (Bai Ling), welcomes him warmly. Hannibal goes to medical school and begins tracking down the members of the SS squad, now living more or less normal lives. 

The atrocity perpetrated by the villains is so ghastly that even the police inspector (Dominic West) looking into Hannibal’s killings feels some empathy for our hero’s propensity for violence. There just isn’t any clue here how someone with this highly developed sense of righteousness – Hannibal does no harm to innocents, though he has a severe reaction to racist rudeness – goes from understandable if over-the-top vengeance to killing indiscriminately as he will later. 


However, as strictly a kind of gothic, brooding and very Grand Guignol treatment of the kind of plot traditionally acted out by the likes of Clint Eastwood, Arnold Schwarzenegger and Hong Kong action heroes, with torture and blood standing in for gunplay and flying fists/feet, Hannibal Rising works pretty well. Thomas Harris, in adapting his novel, keeps things moving well enough, and if he occasionally gives actors some really hard to speak lines (poor Ulliel has to exclaim several times the exact nature of his complaint against his adversaries), they are up to making it work. Ulliel in particular has a kind of sly enjoyment of what he’s doing that makes us complicit in what he’s doing – he shows us Hannibal being walled off from others without walling him off from the audience, an act of skill we can appreciate. Again, this works fine for Hannibal Rising, but it doesn’t give us the genuinely impenetrable figure the character becomes, nor even a clue as to how the transformation will take place. Peter Webber directs with a good sense of urgency, though a climactic fight feels more like something from a Bond film than a confrontation between monsters – until, that is, Hannibal’s more eccentric tendencies come into play and the film momentarily rises to the level of strangeness to which it seems to aspire throughout. 

For viewers who want a tale of very bloody and fairly understandable revenge, Hannibal Rising is a more than competent entry in the field. For those who want an explanation of how Hannibal Lecter got to be Hannibal Lecter, a good deal of imagination is still required to fill in the blanks.


More Content By Abbie Bernstein
THE STRANGERS
(Friday, May 30, 2008)
IRON MAN
(Friday, May 2, 2008)
PROM NIGHT
(Saturday, April 12, 2008)
THE RUINS
(Friday, April 4, 2008)
AMERICAN ZOMBIE
(Saturday, March 29, 2008)
FUNNY GAMES
(Friday, March 14, 2008)
CJ7
(Friday, March 7, 2008)
10,000 B.C
(Thursday, March 6, 2008)
PENELOPE
(Friday, February 29, 2008)
VANTAGE POINT
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Fandango Logo
Comments/Responses
1
larsenrodney • Feb 09, 2007, 10:06am •
Useful and interesting review. My one quibble is that Hannibal doesn't kill indiscriminately -- reaction to rudeness and an albeit warped sense of justice guide him.

kaybar • Feb 09, 2007, 11:12am •
yea very insightful critique of the film, i'm still interested in seeing it

bjjdenver • Feb 09, 2007, 11:44am •
My interest in this is growing and I may have to break down and go see it. Aside from this review, I also heard kind words for it from Jeffrey Lyons, a rarity for a genre movie or a sequel.

jppintar326 • Feb 09, 2007, 03:43pm •
I enjoyed Hannibal Rising more than I thought I would. The young guy playing Lecter is downright creepy. That woman playing Lecter's aunt and lover is hot. I agree toward the end, it does feel like a typical action movie where the guy must save the girl from the bad guys (or is it the worse guy in this case) on a ship. I like it better than "Hannibal", which was poorly written. I understood why Jodie Foster passed on reprising her role in Silence of the Lambs in that film. I liked the sexual tension between Hannibal and his aunt. Maybe there will another movie where Lecter realizes he has acquired a taste for murder and cannibalism and starts killing innocent people.

MonophobicCinephile • May 31, 2008, 11:05pm •
Gaspard Ulliel is absolutely gorgeous and perfectly cast for this sinister yet seductive role.

1
Login to post a comment!