Movie News


Hardy, Lee to Begin WICKER MAN Remake

By: Jarrod Sarafin, News Editor
Date: Tuesday, August 07, 2007
Source: Movie Hole

The long awaited re-imagining of Wicker Man, currently titled COWBOYS FOR CHRIST,  is set to begin next month for Christopher Lee and Director Robin Hardy in both Texas and Scotland, says Moviehole. Btw, I'm talking about the 1973 "Wicker Man", not the 2006 Nic Cage film. Ironically, Robin Hardy directed the cult classic and Lee starred in that film as well. Thirty four years later, the two are reuniting to make this companion/re-imagining of the same story. Obviously, Lee will be playing a different character this time around. In the cult classic, he played "Lord Summerisle". In this new version, he'll be playing the character of "Sir Lachlan Morrison". There's a future trivia question for you movie trivia lovers. Same director, same actor in the same story with two different names filmed 34 years apart.

Plot Summary: The story centers on a Christian singing star and her chaste fiance, a Texas cowboy,  whom travel to Scotland for a music festival that is merely the curtain-raiser for a horrific pagan ritual of sacrifice and murder, and it's uncertain if the power of the Americans' Christian faith will be strong enough to survive the assault of the pagans.

 



More Content By Jarrod Sarafin, News Editor
Agent Zero & Barnell Revealed for WOLVERINE
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Amazon Producing Fantasy CHILD
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Cameron Updates Status on AVATAR
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Doomed JLA, More Mutants & Ant Man!
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
First Bloody Pic from LOST BOYS 2
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
IRON MAN Trailer Debuts on Feb 28 Lost
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
New Victims Ready for FINAL DESTINATION 4
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Two More Gangsters for Mann's ENEMIES
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Weaving Tracks After the WOLFMAN
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
BIONIC WOMAN Officially Axed by NBC?
(Thursday, February 21, 2008)
Comments/Responses
1 2 > >>
ponyboy76 • Aug 07, 2007, 04:41am •
Wow, could I be any less interested in this?

madmanic999 • Aug 07, 2007, 05:57am •
This makes perfect sense, the original licked Donkey balls.... the Nic Cage remake ate Donkey turds.... so let's make another remake.... I usually try to be optimistic but C'MON!!!!

snallygaster • Aug 07, 2007, 06:19am •
As a fan of the original, I'm looking forward to this. The people who did the Nicolas Cage remake clearly had no idea as to what made the original movie work. Judging from the points in the plot summary above, it looks like Hardy is on course to making a more faithful update.

almostunbiased • Aug 07, 2007, 08:14am •
Didn't they just do this???

deadpool01 • Aug 07, 2007, 09:34am •
#1 - ponyboy76 [Aug 7 2007, 4:41 am CDT]
Wow, could I be any less interested in this?

simple put either lindsay lohan or paris hilton in it.

joelwhy • Aug 07, 2007, 09:41am •
Seriously? I mean, the original was ok; but, isn't one terrible remake enough?

Merin • Aug 07, 2007, 10:07am •
The original was pretty good, IMO.

And this retelling isn't just a straight up remake. It could be bad, sure, but I'm mildly interested.

Course, I didn't waste my time with the Nic Cage remake - I had heard it really didn't follow the spirit of the original.

miko34 • Aug 07, 2007, 11:45am •
Give the man a break, he's only made like two films in the past 35 years (which includes the original).

I honestly haven't seen either Wicker movie, but perhaps Hardy saw the Cage one and thought his original film would be forgotten.

ninjavvitch • Aug 07, 2007, 02:57pm •
Hummm ... I'm of mixed feelings about this one.

Being a Pagan and degreed Wiccan, part of me thinks this will only glorify the subliminal fundi Christian message often popping up in movies these days.

This movie will likely to ... try again ... to trample the good name that Pagans today have been trying to make inroads in tv, movies and public relations.

That Christian message being "Where Christianity is right and might, Paganism takes flight" motto.

The heathen anti-hippie free love crazed mentality worked during the 60's and early 70's when the original "Wicker Man" took place along with other anti-hippie movies like "Easy Rider" premiered showing rednecks shotgunning Fonda and Hopper off cycles into the field.

But NOW Paganism/Wicca is a fast growing legal faith with no connection to murder, then or now, but Hollywood tries to continue to show this in sub plots in TV series like J.A.G. (The Witches of Gulfport).

You rarely see radical Christrians taken to task in TV series or movies showing them in a bad light. It's been hip to show adult Pagans in a bad light.

When Pagans are in a good light like "Harry Potter" Christians get their panties in a bunch crying out indoctrination into witchcraft of innocent children.

What I wonder is WHY are there still some brain dead producers out there that insist on tarnishing the good name of a current faith on behalf of the promotion of another. Can't they just co-exist please?

I can see Hardy twisting the idea around to make it a young Christian couple go off on vacation to some Middle Eastern country where they are captured by a radical Muslim cult and taken high up into the mountains where they are beheaded eventually to appease their twisted sense of a "god".

Or change the plot to have it a Christian woman who is a detective/military Captain in the Pentagon/Secret Service offical who marries an wealthy Arabic man. They have a little girl.

Then one day the man takes the child to the Middle East and never returns. The woman travels to the location and tracks her daughter down only to be ensnared into an ancient Arab order of Assassins which the husband is the leader and who used her to gain citizenship, in a prelude, as a way to funnel resources and assassins into the United States and she stands in the way of the future of the organization spreading out as well as the spreading of their radical faith within America.

He and the organization uses her daughter as a way to get her lured to the Middle East where she is powerless away from her country.

Eventually she is beheaded due to her faith coming to the forefront. Then we see other male assassins wooing and taking out key officials in the U.S. upper echelons in the same manner as well as convert Muslims in the U.S. to their purpose and create civil war from within.

Sure it is bashing another faith, but again it is timely and mirrors the hippie flood seen during the time of what inspired the original movie.

Or Hardy can simply take the plot away from Pagans and turn it towards Satanists or Black Mass followers. Which the remake would work in current context as well.

I ask ... why sully the name of Paganism like they once did with the original movie, back in 1973, when the movie was released?

It was largely seen as a propaganda movie against hippie culture but also against Pagans back then by Christians.

We still have nutbar Christians (Rev. Fred Phelps ring a bell) running around today that could use this movie as a promotion of their faith over Paganism/Wicca.

Do we really need more movies, even remade ones posing as Christian propaganda? Tell a story and leave the religion vs religion out of it UNLESS it is timely and plausible to bring a faith in that HAS done human sacrifice in the name of their faith. Radical Islam would fit that bill nicely in these times.

As for the Nicholas Cage version. I did see that movie a few months ago and I did like it. Much as I could due to my faith and separating it to enjoy the movie.

At least the story didn't focus on religion vs religion like this "COWBOYS FOR CHRIST" is attempting to do, but it stayed with the storyline of police officer goes to a remote location to investigate the diappearance of a young girl.

They kinda kept to the original plot but they did take liberties throughout the movie. For one, making Cage's character allergic to bee venom and crippling him, etc... oh and they left out the nude girl singing and dancing part next door to him. :-)

The general foundation plot remained but you can see where they contemporized it. It was okay, not blockbuster worthy though. :-)

jetpackjesus • Aug 07, 2007, 03:52pm •
The Nic Cage one was one of the great comedies of the year. Watch the last 1/3ish and try to contain your laughter. He kicks Leelee Sobieski in the face! Most of the movie sucks, but the final act really made it worth the price of admission, albeit for entirely the wrong reason.

Check out my profile as I'm pretty sure there's a link to a hilarious video montage of the best parts that I put up months ago.

1 2 > >>
Login to post a comment!