HATCHET - Mania.com



Movie Review

Mania Grade: B-

10 Comments | Add

 

Rate & Share:

 

Related Links:

 

Info:

  • Reviewed Format: Theatrical Release
  • Rated: R
  • Stars: Joel Moore, Tamara Feldman, Deon Richmond, Mercedes McNab, Kane Hodder
  • Writer: Adam Green
  • Director: Adam Green

HATCHET

To plot or not to plot...

By Rachel Reitsleff     September 07, 2007


Tamara Feldman and Deon Richmond in HATCHET (2007).
© Anchor Bay Entertainment
It’s interesting to have Hatchet come out a week after Rob Zombie’s remake of Halloween – between them, they offer a look at a variety ‘70s slasher styles. The latter puts some revisions in the form, but doesn’t improve upon the original, while Hatchet feels more retro, though writer/director Adam Green does put a few new spins in with tradition.
 
In Hatchet, out-of-town college student Ben (Joel Moore) and his best friend Marcus (Deon Richmond) are in New Orleans at Halloween. Ben persuades Marcus to go on a nighttime swamp cruise. Little do they, their fellow tourists and even their tour guide (Perry Shen) know that Victor Crowley (Kane Hodder) is on the prowl. Victor, we learn, was a terribly malformed young man, loved by his father (also played by Hodder in flashback) but tormented by his peers, who died in a tragic accident and is now rumored to haunt the part of the bayou where he died. Turns out there’s a lot of truth to those rumors, as our group discovers when their boat runs aground near Victor’s old home.
 
Hatchet is being touted as “old school horror,” assuming one’s schooldays were the late ‘70s. Filmmaker Green seems to be hewing primarily to Friday the 13th in the villain’s back story. Innovations in the form include giving the main characters more personality and history and dispensing with a mask for the creature, which gives Hatchet a kind of refreshingly upfront feel. However, the set-ups for the characters don’t have much of a payoff later in the running – the early subplots don’t really lead anywhere. Although Green and his game cast, including horror stalwarts Tony Todd and Robert Englund, and makeup effects maestro John Carl Buechler, in cameos, the script simply doesn’t deal with the fact that on the first couple of attacks, our heroes flee the scene while the victims are still alive (if only marginally). Green doesn’t seem to be going for Cabin Fever-style guilt here, and the effect is emotionally distancing, so it’s hard to tell what he’s trying to accomplish with this nuance – are we meant to not especially like the characters?
 
Bloodshed is surreally over-the-top – Victor can rip people’s limbs off, creating shower-like splatter – there are various organs tossed about, and the jump scares work fairly well. The overall result is a decent splatter offering that would have pleased back in the day without breaking much ground.

COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

Showing items 1 - 10 of 10
1 
AlpineWoods 9/7/2007 7:51:59 AM
I wanted to see this movie for one reason. Because it was rated NC-17 for a short time. But it's been cut down to an R rating. That actually disappointed me a little, but I'm still going to see the movie, anyway. Of course, the DVD will be "unrated" like every other horror DVD that comes out.
superfrank78 9/7/2007 6:44:18 PM
Uh no. This is worse than Halloween and is maybe a baby-step better than a sci-fi network original picture. The FX were below amateurish and filmed in a way to try an disgust you- no scare or frighten or shock. Victor Crowley is pretty much Jason Voorhees relocated to New Orleans so thats an F on originality. All the characers are either poorly written or badly acted and the plot has holes the size of the Bayou. This should have been straight to DVD. Being touted as old school horror? Well Mr Adam Green maybe try renting Motel Hell or Prom Night or Maniac then do a re-write...as far as I could tell you remade Friday the 13th with a different name and still had the nerve to use Kane Hodder. I am very happy I saw this for free and with that it was still a waste of an evening. Eventually the next Alfred Hitchcock or John Carpenter will present himself and make a good scary movie but Adam Green along with Eli Roth and Rob Zombie and pretty much all the Horror genre 'directors' of today seem to be stuck in this torture porn,excess blood gross out style of film making instead of capturing the essence of what made movies like Halloween,Nightmare on Elm St,Friday the 13th,Psycho,Prom Night,Maniac,10 to Midnight,Angel etc.. we the audience don't need to see the kill! we don't need to see the buckets of blood,limbs torn off,torture porn! Whatever happened to suspense? Why can't we get more films like Disturbia? hell even Wolf Creek was better than these stinkers...
Flint521466 9/8/2007 4:13:42 AM
The only thing Rob Zombie's Halloween has going for it was the gratuitous nudity.
chemikillgod 9/8/2007 11:10:50 AM
one word: hilarious. it started out slow but it really does hearken back to the cheesiness of badly made early horror. I'm pretty sure that I think it's supposed to echo the period of horror where the bad guys got to do the silliest but most disgusting kills to their victims. It's really not in the same vein as in the new breed of brutal horror that we've been seeing lately. I mean, every character on there is a stereotype taken to the extreme. Its so ridiculous. All the bad dialogue all the way to the camera shots just lends to an air of hilarity. Plus, you get Harmony's (from Buffy/Angel) tits throughout it.
rudewordsmith 9/8/2007 9:26:57 PM
Haha. And horror has lost an ally in Merin. But hey, tits are great. It's true that horror and suspense films are two different creatures -- similar, but different. But it is also true that the horror of today is severely lacking in the suspense department. A great horror film is bred out of harmony amongst the ingredients. New horror films just rely on excess of one or two (usually blood or nudity).
rudewordsmith 9/9/2007 5:46:56 PM
I'm just givin' ya a hard time, Merin. But I agree. We need a true talent to tackle some Lovecraft stories, just to show folks how it's supposed to be done. I'm thinking... Guillermo Del Toro?
1 

ADD A COMMENT

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Please click here to login.

MORE CONTENT BY RACHEL REITSLEFF

POPULAR TOPICS