I still don't understand how they keep the Connecticut part of the title if the movie is set in Georgia...

find it interesting that the creators of the first film not only waited so long  to try and do a sequel but  set it in a different place all together including throwing in the house being an under ground rail road way station that is haunted by an unruly ghost. plus no mention of any of the characters from the first one

 I'm pretty sure the story behind the first movie and the story behind this one have both already had Discovery Channel documentaries done about them...and yeah, keeping the "Haunting in Connecticut" part is beyond stupid, IMO.

Yeah, why not just call it "Ghosts of Georgia."

The really odd thing is, wasn't there already a "Haunting in Georgia" movie??  I believe it was a tv movie and is sold as a 2 pack with the original HiC movie.  From what I've read it was terrible.. odd that they would go to that well again.

Ghosts don't have gps or sense of direction so you guys need to excuse them.....they thought they were still in Connecticut

Haunting in Conneticut slash Georgia a geography teachers worst nightmare.