Maniac Discussion


Hollywood Studios Ponder Future Franchises

By: Jarrod Sarafin, News Editor
Date: Tuesday, July 10, 2007
Source: The Hollywood Reporter

Columnist Stephen Galloway at the Hollywood Reporter has released a verifiable goldmine of information surrounding quite a bit of future movies inside Hollywood. With so many studios taking so many gambles on big budgeted projects which could turn into potential franchises, a lot of insiders have questions on whether these movies will make or break the bank..

Here's some topics he wrote in his feature column this morning and some details about the projects:

By Stephen Galloway

At some point within the next two weeks, producer Laura Ziskin and the top brass of Sony Pictures Entertainment will sit down together for the first time since "Spider-Man 3" opened May 4 to discuss the franchise's future.

It's a crucial meeting, all the more so because director Sam Raimi will be there. And Raimi, who has sent contradictory messages about his future plans, might at last indicate whether he'll helm the next installment.

"It would be great to have everybody back," Ziskin says. "But no one is going to sign on the dotted line until we have a script. These are the questions being discussed now. The one thing we have answered definitively is: There will be more 'Spider-Man' movies. We just haven't answered what shape they will come in and (Sony) hasn't given us a release date."

The upcoming meeting "will be the first step in a process," Ziskin adds. "'Spider-Man' will continue; I can't tell you every person who will be involved."

It goes without saying just how critical the "Spider-Man" franchise is to the studio's bottom line; at press time, the franchise had netted upwards of $2 billion in boxoffice receipts, not to mention home video revenue and other income from ancillary ventures. But it is hardly unique in today's Hollywood.

So what do you guys think? I figure why not open a discussion about the future within all these franchises...Any films on the studios agenda that you're really looking forward to? Any films you have no interest in and think will bomb back to the stone age? Let's hear your thoughts on the situation inside Hollywood's studios. 


More Content By Jarrod Sarafin, News Editor
Agent Zero & Barnell Revealed for WOLVERINE
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Amazon Producing Fantasy CHILD
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Cameron Updates Status on AVATAR
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Doomed JLA, More Mutants & Ant Man!
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
First Bloody Pic from LOST BOYS 2
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
IRON MAN Trailer Debuts on Feb 28 Lost
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
New Victims Ready for FINAL DESTINATION 4
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Two More Gangsters for Mann's ENEMIES
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Weaving Tracks After the WOLFMAN
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
BIONIC WOMAN Officially Axed by NBC?
(Thursday, February 21, 2008)
Fandango Logo
Comments/Responses
1 2 3 > >>
scoxocs • Jul 10, 2007, 05:11am •
I'm not a fan of the way X Men 3 ended and I hope that in one of the spinoffs they give us an update on what exactly happened to Prof X.

Whiskeymovie • Jul 10, 2007, 06:28am •
Well, it is time to close out some franchises before they turn into Friday the 13th VIII or something like that. It's better to quit while ahead. I am excited about quite a few of the movies coming out, so I think that the studios will still do ok with new properties. As far as X-Men 3, I think the movie was pretty good, being t hat Brett Ratner came on like a month before shooting began, which gave him like no time for pre-production. It coud have been better, but i still think it was better than X-Men 1.

jppintar326 • Jul 10, 2007, 06:38am •
Most of the sequels we have seen this year look like there isn't much left in the franchises. Shrek and Pirates of the Caribbean look like they should end. Spiderman 4 has about a 50/50 chance of being made. I wouldn't mind another Die Hard if they got rid of that annoying computer geek. I would like to see more of the Fantastic Four. I seem to be in the minority in liking both of them. We know Harry Potter has two more movies. I have a feeling The Bourne Ultimatium wil be the last in the series.

I wouldn't be too concerned about 60% drop off from first to second weekend. I think we have seen the last of movies that run and run all the way to Labor Day. The audience, even the ones who go to the movies, knows that these films will be out on DVD by Christmas. They will go to see the film to say they have seen it and then pre-order it on DVD and not go in for a second showing at the theater. Theater owners may not like it, but I looks like that it is the way the business is going.

nax37 • Jul 10, 2007, 07:38am •
Personally, I think they should run a franchise into the ground. Make another Spider-Man, give it a shot. Recast if you have to. If it sucks, oh well. It doesn't take anything away from the good Spider-Man movies, in my eyes. Might as well try to make another good one.

rgtchtiger • Jul 10, 2007, 07:58am •
As highly unlikely as it is, I really wish Paramount would turn Sky Captain into a franchise. I remember in the months leading up to its release, the studio was VERY excited about it and wanted it to receive proper attention, but unfortunately it still tanked. Sky Captain was my favorite film of 2004 and I really thought it could've taken on an Indiana Jones-type legacy. Oh well...

scooter167 • Jul 10, 2007, 08:55am •
The X men franchise will end up being like Batman, and superman.In a few years a new director will be hired to continue.He will most likely start over instead of continuing where 3 left off..By the way Friday the 13 th is back next summer .michael bay is starting the franchise over again from the beginning.

AlpineWoods • Jul 10, 2007, 09:18am •
It's really just all about the box office numbers. Jaws was the first. Star Wars came next, and so on. As long as these franchise movies make the money they're intended to, then the franchises, each one of them, will continue. Though I think a Spider-Man Part 12 might be pushing it a bit.And that might not be such a long shot. It could very well happen. But I like the Spider-Man movies. I saw all three Pirates movies. FF2 was very good. It really comes down to the money they make. The movie franchises will continue as long we moviegoers keep going to see them. I, myself, really like going to see the summer movies.

wessmith1966 • Jul 10, 2007, 09:29am •
The Bourne series is getting expensive, so I doubt there will be another. I think Pirates and Shrek should call it quits; I didn't think either measured up to the first two. Sony knows it has a cash cow in Spider-Man, so I think we'll see another with Sam, Kirsten and Tobey before they all call it quits. Raimi will become a producer and a new director and cast will be named, with some of the supporting characters being kept on board for continuity.

Captmathman • Jul 10, 2007, 09:41am •
Franchise movies are safer for the studios. It makes good business sense to throw lots of cash that way, and use the returns to subsidize riskier projects (well, some of the returns, anyway...). I think it's a good model.
I like many of these franchises, personally (you say Jaws was first AlpineWoods, but there were many series before that, including one about a spy who likes martinis), and as long as they hold my interest, I'll be back.
The trouble is, one bad entry can spoil the whole shootin' match. You can count on the attendance of some fraction of the unique viewers of the previous installment (hard to estimate, given repeat viewings), but those viewers may have watched on DVD, TV, or some other medium. It would be interesting to do a study to determine the number of people who actually watch at least once each entry in a franchise.
One exception to all this is the aforementioned spy series. I had given up on it in the Timothy Dalton years, but came back after positive wom encouraged me to give it another chance with CR last fall. So I guess it's possible to attract new viewers to a franchise, or reclaim old viewers, but I think that may be the exception to the rule.
Idea for a new franchise: Steven Brust's Jhereg series.

monkeyfoot • Jul 10, 2007, 09:41am •
I always hope for the best for all the franchise films because it just means they can make more series on a different variety of subjects.
Franchise films have become the meat & potatoes of keeping movie studios in business. If you get a good one you've got regular cash rolling in every couple of years, plus DVD and cable sales, toys and memorabilia. Associated books and comics, etc. That's what Marvel studios and their investors are counting on. They just have to pay strong attention to the artistic and creative side of things and put out quality material (the "show" part of show business).

1 2 3 > >>
Login to post a comment!