Movie Review

Mania Grade: A-

12 Comments | Add


Rate & Share:


Related Links:



  • Reviewed Format: Theatrical Release
  • Rated: R
  • Cast: Lauren German, Roger Bart, Bijou Phillips, Richard Burgi, Vera Jordanova, Jay Hernandez, Jordan Ladd, Edwige Fenech
  • Writer: Eli Roth
  • Director: Eli Roth
  • Distributor: Lionsgate


Slovak Chamber of Horrors continues

By Brian Thomas     June 08, 2007

Bijou Phillips in HOSTEL: PART II (2007).
© Lionsgate Films
The advance word on the sequel to Hostel was that it was basically going to be “Hostel with girls”. Now, who needs that?

Who needs a sequel to Hostel in the first place, and who needs one that rehashes the first story all over again? And especially, who needs a rehash of a hard-edged torture chamber movie with women as the victims?

Fortunatelt, writer/director Eli Roth feels the same way and is a step ahead of the audience. “I never, ever intended to make a sequel to Hostel,” Roth explained at a preview screening, “But when the movie became Number 1 on opening weekend, beating out Narnia, it became obvious that Lionsgate would be pushing for a sequel, and I decided that if a sequel was ever going to be made, I had to do it myself – and right away. The themes explored in the first film were too of-the-moment and waiting on the sequel would spoil that.”

And though obviously appreciative of the effect of blood and gore in movies, he knows there’s a line between chilling or even disturbing an audience and just being unpleasant. That line of discomfort is drawn closer when women become the targets of violence, and in Hostel Part 2, it’s obvious that he’s taken care not to go over that line between the artful or shocking scare (or gross-out) and the outright repellent and offensive.

He also knew that sequels are often most satisfying when treated as a direct continuation, thus the “Part 2” title. Job one of any horror sequel – unless they take the cop out “sequel in name only” route – is to deal with the survivors of the previous film’s mayhem. Roth does so with a semi-tribute to Friday the 13th Part 2 – a sequence that unfortunately contains the same kind of cheat, but provides a nice introductory mix of unease, shocks and humor.

We are introduced to our trio of obnoxiously self-absorbed American college students traveling in Europe, all three of which are somewhat played against type before the end. There’s the sharp rich girl with a chip on her shoulder Beth (Lauren German). There’s the faithful wild girl Whitney (Bijou Phillips). And then there’s the tag-along nerdy misfit Lorna (Heather Matarazzo) that the other two feel sorry for. While taking an art class in Italy (taught by Eurohorror legend Edwige Fenech), they meet up with model Axelle (Vera Jordanova), who later lures them to the spas of Slovakia and a certain youth hostel.

On their arrival, Roth shows us his scenario from a couple of different angles, knowing we’ve already seen it from the victim POV. We see the girls stalked, their images displayed online in a private auction to bidders worldwide. The winner in a couple of the auctions are wealthy thrill-seekers Todd and Stuart (Richard Burgi and Roger Bart, both of Desperate Housewives), who immediately make their excuses and jet off to Slovokia to claim their first kills. As the girls are maneuvered into position for easy capture, we learn a bit more about what makes them tick, as well as learning a bit more about the auction winners and the deeply evil people running the murder-for-dollars business.

The third act of the film consists of Roth taking the expectations he’s built up and giving them a twist, while here and there popping in the film’s money shots – a string of fine cinematic quality kills designed to have the audience abuzz long afterward.

As I stated in reviewing Hostel, the premise of the films makes no sense, at least as given. Those running such a carefully planned illegal operation would be very unlikely to choose such high profile victims as rich American students. There would be an investigation. Things would get messy – or messier than intended. Unless there’s an underlying reason for them choosing such targets that we haven’t learned yet, it just doesn’t hold together. But accepting that stretch, Roth gives his audience the kind of raw thrills the movie business rarely dares to serve anymore, and does so with enough intelligence that the horror show works on more than one level.

I didn’t really need to see a sequel to Hostel, but was surprised at how glad I am that I did.
Copyright © 2007 Brian Thomas, author of the massive book VideoHound’s Dragon: Asian Action & Cult Flicks, available now!


Showing items 1 - 10 of 12
1 2 >  >>  
soulstealer82 6/8/2007 12:12:22 AM
i love horror movies and most of the really gorey ones i like but the 1st Hostel movie made me kinda nautious so im probably gonna wait for this one to come out on dvd before i see it
sinbadthesailor 6/8/2007 12:40:04 AM
not me I'll try and see it this weekend for sure!
shadowprime 6/8/2007 7:24:14 AM
I understand...some of us like chocolate, and some of us like vanilla. That is what freedom of choice is all about. However, sorry... to me, this movie and those like it are a celebration not of horror, but of the worst impulses in some to get off on sadism and torture. Not horror, not really, and not even gore, but sadism. Suffering. Sick power trips. That it makes a lot of money tells you nothing more than there is an audience for this kind of... stuff. There are audiences for MANY things that are hardly worthy of defense or celebration. No thanks. I'll be happy when and if the "torture porn" genre burns itself out. Shadow
CappyMorgan 6/8/2007 9:00:50 AM
I'm with shadowprime...I'm not a gore/torture hound. It is not my definitiion of "horror". The best horror, to me, is subtle and plays in the mind more than being a blood fest. The best monster movies are those that never show too much. CGI, over the top gore, etc. just take away from the imagination. They are about as effective to me as watching another car chase in a film. I'll pass on this and the future Saw sequels.
MIKWOZ 6/8/2007 10:34:08 AM
C'MON! The first movie sucked. The gore was cheesy and fake looking (except for the achilles tendon scene), the acting was horrible, and the movie was fragmented with no pace to it! A bad "b" movie at best. But money talks so we'll see hostel 3,4,and 5 probably all direct to dvd. (sigh) I hate Follwood.
GentlemenDeath 6/8/2007 1:02:14 PM
This is the 8th review i have read given Hostel a good nod. What does that tell you, that all of america likes it, no. It tells you that all most of people, are just concentrating on the gore aspect and not what the movie represents....oh well, i am going to see this tonight.
thebigiff 6/9/2007 1:22:59 PM
These types of crap fests are just that, crap. It reminds me of people who play with their own crap. Who plays with their own crap you might wonder? I read an article a few years ago on a flight to San Diego from Minneapolis. I t was an article in which Courtney Love was quoted as saying she played with her own crap and her nickname when she was younger was pee girl. Makes you wonder the type of "people" who goes and watches said crap. I knew there'd be reason for me having read the article about Ms Love.
bdd 6/9/2007 2:49:17 PM
I like horror movies, but I can't say that anymore because people think I like Gorish movies, which I don't. Horror movies are classics, so called horror movies of today are sick and disturbing.
sinbadthesailor 6/10/2007 1:08:12 AM
well for those that care: I saw the movie and have to say they did better this time around then the first. The deaths in this movie are much more elaborate and thought out in my opinion, which really gives the movie a good twist as the story unfolds.
1 2 >  >>  


You must be logged in to leave a comment. Please click here to login.