Movie News


HULK Gets Angry in New Online Photos

By: Jarrod Sarafin
Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2008
Source: Yahoo Movies

Some new photos have popped up online for The Incredible Hulk courtesy of Yahoo Movies. One of them is the Hulk getting mighty angry, judging by the photo on the left (click on it). Plenty of more for you Maniacs, which you see by clicking the link below. The upcoming superhero flick stars Edward Norton, Liv Tyler, Tim Roth, Tim Blake Nelson, Ty Burrell and William Hurt. Director Louis Leterrier led the project, based on a screenplay by Zak Penn and Edward Norton.

Click here to see the slide show.

Plot Summary: "The Incredible Hulk" kicks off an all-new, explosive and action-packed epic of one of the most popular superheroes of all time. In this new beginning, scientist Bruce Banner (Edward Norton) desperately hunts for a cure to the gamma radiation that poisoned his cells and unleashes the unbridled force of rage within him: The Hulk.

Living in the shadows--cut off from a life he knew and the woman he loves, Betty Ross (Liv Tyler)--Banner struggles to avoid the obsessive pursuit of his nemesis, General Thunderbolt Ross (William Hurt), and the military machinery that seeks to capture him and brutally exploit his power.


As all three grapple with the secrets that led to The Hulk's creation, they are confronted with a monstrous new adversary known as The Abomination (Tim Roth), whose destructive strength exceeds even The Hulk's own. And on June 13, 2008, one scientist must make an agonizing final choice: accept a peaceful life as Bruce Banner or find heroism in the creature he holds inside--The Incredible Hulk.

The Incredible Hulk will hit theaters June 13, 2008.





More Content By Jarrod Sarafin
Fandango Logo
Comments/Responses
1 2 3 > >>
AzuLTaLoN • Apr 30, 2008, 02:17am •
cgi looks better than before and hulks' waist looks more proportional than before, all in all good stuff.

ponyboy76 • Apr 30, 2008, 03:25am •
It looks cool, but I think that the Hulk is really hard to do in live action. I mean it looks good but it still looks...fake. I guess CGI technology isn`t far ahead enough to do anything more realistic. Maybe it has to do with him being green? I mean those dinosaurs in Jurassic Park looked pretty damn real. Why can't they do something like that?

hanso • Apr 30, 2008, 05:02am •
Hulk pics look nice but I'm still pumped about the Dark Knight trailer from yesterday so they are just bah compared to that.

wessmith1966 • Apr 30, 2008, 05:48am •
I agree with ponyboy76; Hulk looks better, but he still looks "fake." Regardless of that, I'm still looking forward to the movie and I think I'm going to like this one better than the first one. I liked the one picture that was a close-up of Banner's face; reminded me a lot of the Bill Bixby TV show. The picture of Hulk and Blonsky (pre abomination) was pretty good too.

ponyboy76 • Apr 30, 2008, 06:11am •
Did anyone else notice that Bruce Banner`s face is all scarred up under his eye? I wonder what happened there.

WISEGUY562 • Apr 30, 2008, 06:31am •
The CGI isn't along far enough for humans, that's obvious. We know this from LOTR and all the other cgi projects. The eyes and mannerisms are difficult to do, knowing and accepting this already I think the Hulk looks fucking awesome. Although he is taller than the 7-8 footer I expected. I'm really looking forward to this. From the look and the plot I think this movie is going to be great. I don't know how is going to fare because it seems that most people are still down from the first, especially non-genre fans, who may not be willing to give it a second chance.

killerville • Apr 30, 2008, 06:39am •
looks more realistic than the hulk poodle

fft5305 • Apr 30, 2008, 08:08am •
I didn't see any scarring. I think it's just bags under his eyes from lack of sleep. You know, man on the run and all that... I think the CGI looks good in this so far. The biggest problem is that he's 9 feet tall and green. Kind of hard to look TOO realistic. I think it's interesting the direction they're going with Blonsky. From descriptions I've read, he's in human form the first time he goes up against the Hulk. Then, after he gets his ass kicked, he goes back and gets a 2nd boost or whatever and becomes the Abomination. Should be interesting.

ponyboy76 • Apr 30, 2008, 08:09am •
Its not the eyes and mannerisms I have a problem with. They could have done what they did with Gollum in LOTR and that would have been fine. It is the actual visualization that looks slightly off. I am not saying it is bad. It is a huge improvement on the 2003 Hulk. It is just that in some shots the Hulk almost looks like a plastic action figure. He has this shiny gloss going on. Maybe it looks better when he is moving in real time. -------------- Banner is definitely scarred under his left eye in those pics.

jedibanner • Apr 30, 2008, 08:49am •
I guess I'm the only one who liked the way the Hulk looked in the alst movie. I would've just made him smaller in height since in that version he was like 17 foot tall or something where normally, he should be like 11 foot or something.

This new version looks ugly and not large enough, he looks too skinny for the Hulk.

I guess my expectations for this movie are already shattered since Ed Norton is a good actor but I just don't see him as Bruce Banner. Liv tyler is not my choice for Betty Banner and from then on, everything that is hapening, I guess I will wait and see for the movie to come out.

CGI looks good but still not right compared to what the Hulk should look like.

1 2 3 > >>
Login to post a comment!