Movie News


Jackson Explains 'Not' Directing THE HOBBIT

By: Jarrod Sarafin, News Editor
Date: Wednesday, December 19, 2007
Source: Entertainment Weekly

While the announcement yesterday caused a lot of fan relief, there's still the question on who's directing the two new HOBBIT films. A lot of fans have wondered why Peter Jackson himself isn't directing the project, instead serving as Executive Producer for the projects. Well, it didn't take long for Jackson's rep to explain the issue to Entertaiment Weekly. Basically, Jackson feels that the fans have waited long enough for the film to get made and having him do it would mean that those fans would have to wait even longer, something he's not willing to do..Here's the official word from his camp...

While MGM and New Line want to keep Jackson's involvement in the film as broad as possible, hinting that he may take up both writing and directing responsibilities, Jackson's manager Ken Kamins told Hollywood Insider that Jackson won't be directing the films. "Peter won't be directing because he felt the fans have waited long enough for The Hobbit. It will take the better part of every day of the next four years to write, direct and produce two Hobbit films. Given his current obligations to both The Lovely Bones and Tintin, waiting for Peter, Fran, and Phillippa to write, direct and produce The Hobbit would require the fans wait even longer."

Some names that have been thrown out include; Sam Raimi, Guillermo del Toro and Alfonso Cuaron. New Line's Bob Shaye was quick to add that there is a short list of directors that they're looking into but no decisions have been made at this point. As a sidenote, Sam Raimi was offered the job and has expressed interest but said flat out that he wouldn't do it if Peter Jackson wasn't involved. Raimi has received his wish on that front now that the case is settled. New Line, MGM & Peter Jackson will begin planning the two films in early 2008.



More Content By Jarrod Sarafin, News Editor
Agent Zero & Barnell Revealed for WOLVERINE
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Amazon Producing Fantasy CHILD
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Cameron Updates Status on AVATAR
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Doomed JLA, More Mutants & Ant Man!
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
First Bloody Pic from LOST BOYS 2
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
IRON MAN Trailer Debuts on Feb 28 Lost
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
New Victims Ready for FINAL DESTINATION 4
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Two More Gangsters for Mann's ENEMIES
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
Weaving Tracks After the WOLFMAN
(Friday, February 22, 2008)
BIONIC WOMAN Officially Axed by NBC?
(Thursday, February 21, 2008)
Comments/Responses
1 2 > >>
madmanic999 • Dec 19, 2007, 04:11pm •
You know what they say... good things come to those who wait... and I would be willing to wait for Jackson...
That being said, i am sure his close involvment as producer will mean that the right director and writers will be chosen.

Todd89 • Dec 19, 2007, 04:21pm •
This is good news on all accounts, I'm sure they'll get someone to direct the hobbit films.
But what about the other books:
Leaf by Niggle
On fairy storys
Farmer Giles of Ham
The Homecoming of Beorhtnoth
The Adventures of Tom Bombadil
The Road Goes Ever On
Smith of Wootton Major
The Children of Huron
Every one of them has the right to be films, and I bet Christopher Tolkien would be amazed if each and every one of them were made right.
As of the good news, I can wait and I would jump at the chance to see an amazing film or two.

almostunbiased • Dec 19, 2007, 04:30pm •
I want Peter. I'll wait five years for his version.

galaga51 • Dec 19, 2007, 04:36pm •
I'll see your five and raise you two. ;-)

Filch • Dec 19, 2007, 04:39pm •
I'm willing to wait for Jackson...5,10 even 15 years I dont care....But If I half to choose a new director it would be Del toro hands down...Dont let Raimi touch it..after 2 so so spiderman movies and 1 god awful one...let him go on to somthing else...I'm a huge Tolkien fan,but I would not wtach these films if Raimi's involved, you might as well get McG :(

WISEGUY562 • Dec 19, 2007, 05:02pm •
I would be willing to wait also. I just think that Jackson doesn't want to put himself through the same grind that he had to go through with the LOTR and on top of that the scrutiny he will have to face when the films come out and all the comparisons to LOTR and wether or not he was able to live up to the hype. It's going to be hard for him to do anything in the same genre without drawing comparisons and criticism. As long as he's involved I think the quality shouldn't suffer. And I call bullshit on anyone saying they won't see this regardless of who directs.

oriongreenguy • Dec 19, 2007, 06:37pm •
I can wait! I can wait!

I'm just glad at this point things are moving!

Don't rush it!

cso1982 • Dec 19, 2007, 06:38pm •
I agree with Filch. I would wait for PJ. Buuuuut, if the choice is between Raimi and Del Toro, Del Toro should do it. I mean, just sit and watch Pan's Labyrinth and tell me that isn't a masterpiece--great direction, cinematography and story. Also, I don't think any other person other than Howard Shore should be allowed to score these 2 films. What he did with the LOTR's score was pure genius. (but then again...these are just my opinions.)

smegforbrain • Dec 19, 2007, 07:06pm •
I'm willing to wait for a Peter Jackson directed The Hobbit.

But, on the flip side, I want Ian McKellan and Ian Holm to reprise their roles as Gandalf and Bilbo... and they're not getting any younger.

vampiresuck • Dec 19, 2007, 08:34pm •
Wiseguy is right, people will see it regardless.
I can't believe someone compared Raimi to McG. That's one of the most absurd things ive read, just coz of spidey 3? Cmon. Maybe venom shouldn't have been in that one, but it was still a good, moving story. And i applaud Raimi for the direction he took Peter. Also, comparing a sipdey flick to a tolkien one is ridiculous as they're at totally oposite ends of the spectrum, content wise and visually.
However, i do agree with Del Toro taking up the job. Pan's Labyrinth is amazing and his use of the darker style would definately fit middle earth. That being said, remember the Hobbit is a fair bit lighter than LOTR as it was originally intended for children. Also, if Jackson is going to write and produce then he still will play a major part in the films. Having him in those roles will be a hell of a lot better than not at all.
Anyway, i'm very much keen for more middle earth stories on the big screen. I'm still amazed by the extended editions (much better than the theatrical versions) everytime i watch them.

On the actors not getting any younger; they can always digitally make them look younger, like they did with Mckellan and Stewart in X3.

1 2 > >>
Login to post a comment!