DVD Review


JUMPER (2-Disc Special Edition)

By: Tim Janson
Review Date: Sunday, June 15, 2008

You can keep your super strength, speed and flying…teleportation, now THAT is a super power! The ability to transport yourself to any location on the globe in a blink of an eye; what can beat that? David Rice is a normal but shy 15 year old, the victim of bullies at school and an abusive father (Michael Rooker) at home. His life changes the day he finds he has the ability to teleport. David does exactly what you should do if you had this ability; he jumps into a bank vault and makes off with a boatload of cash, leaving the authorities puzzles. Either years later, the now adult David (Christensen) is living the good life in a posh New York apartment when his life again is turned upside down, this time by a mysterious man named Roland (Jackson) who shows up at his apartment and tries to kill him.

He flees back to the safety of the Michigan town where he grew up and to the girl he loved as a teenager, Millie (Rachel Bilson). The pair go on a trip to Italy where David is attacked again in the Roman Coliseum byt men who use electrical weapons that can negate his ability. David also meets Griffin, another young man with the power to teleport. He learns that the people hunting them are called Paladins and they’ve been hunting down and killing Jumpers for centuries. David and Griffin begin a worldwide game of tag as they try to elude Roland and the other Paladins while David tries to protect Millie.

Jumper is filled with some dazzling sites as David Jumps to the face of London’s Big Ben as well as to the head of the Great Sphinx in Egypt. The effect of the jumps was done very well. At first, David’s jumps are accompanied by a great deal of noise and commotion but as he refines his power he simply whooshes like the wind. There’s a humorous sequence where he is watching TV and rather than reach his arm a bit to grab sometime, he teleports over a foot to get it. Unfortunately most of the film isn’t quite as fun or clever. Once you get past the thrill of the Jumpers power to go literally everywhere you’re stuck with a plot that is filled with holes and characters with little development.


Why do Paladins hunt Jumpers? Who are these Paladins? Evidently they’ve been fighting for centuries and the best reason that was given is that Jumpers always go bad. Then there is the fact that David disappeared and was believed dead for eight years. He shows up at the bar where Millie works and she runs off to Italy with him that afternoon. I’ve been to bars in Ann Arbor…the women there are NOT that easy! There is a subplot involving David and his Mother (Diane Lane) that goes completely unresolved. And just why does electricity negate the Jumpers power? It just DOES! Maybe the main problem with Jumper is we really don’t know who to root for. The Paladins are made out to be the bad guys and yet if Jumpers are using their powers to rob banks and such, shouldn’t they be hunted down?

Samuel L. Jackson is a fine actor but he’s played so many of these menacing type roles that he’s becoming a bit of a caricature. Hayden Christensen brings little charisma to his role. His wooden narration is just as bland. Only Jamie Bell manages to turn in an above average performance as Griffin, the Englishman who has been hunting Paladins down on his own. The film would have benefited from about 15 more minutes of runtime to further develop the plot and characters. As it is, the end was left open for a sequel, which is being considered.

The Two Disc edition comes with some nice extras including:

Audio commentary with Director Doug Liman, Writer/Producer Simon Kinberg and Producer Lucas Foster

Six deleted scenes

Jumping From Novel To Film: The Past, Present & Future of Jumper Featurette

Making An Actor Jump Featurette

Previz: Future Concepts

Doug Liman’s Jumper: Uncensored Featurette

Jumping Around The World Featurette
Jumpstart: David’s Story Animated Graphic Novel


More Content By Tim Janson
Fandango Logo
Comments/Responses
1
hanso • Jun 15, 2008, 12:30am •
Had they shown Rachel Bilson's boobies, this film would've gotten an A from me.

LittleNell • Jun 15, 2008, 08:10am •
I think the reason so many things were unresolved was that it was meant to have sequels. This movie was just a fun teenage fantasy: stylish clothes, unlimited travel, unlimited cash, parents who deserve to be rebelled against, and easy-to-beat villains. I would have loved it at 15 or 16. I still enjoyed it as an adult.

WISEGUY562 • Jun 15, 2008, 03:23pm •
This was a rare miss for me at the movies so of course I ran out and bought the dvd. I enjoyed this film quite a bit. I wasn't expecting much to begin with due to all the negative comments but I found it very entertaining.

Hayden was ok, it's obvious the guy isn't going to win any Oscars anytime soon but for this sort of stuff he's perfect. SLJ was his usual self, always entertaining to say the least.

almostunbiased • Jun 15, 2008, 04:28pm •
I too was not expecting much and I thought it was fun. Just the idea is so cool, how could you not like it. I just rented it lately and I'd totally go see a sequel. They wanted to make a trilogy. I think they had a ok introduction and this could be done even better with a new story about the war between the Paladins and the Jumpers.
I'd like to see Jamie come back, but I don't think he'd want to work for Liman again after watching the extras. i can't imagine why anyone would.

mike10 • Jun 15, 2008, 04:46pm •
I enjoyed Jumper. I didn't feel like I was cheated out of 2 hours of my life like some movies (Fantastic Four comes to mind).
On a side note, I love this site and what I'm about to say is not meant to be mean. There are alot of simple spelling mistakes that spell check could easily take care off. I see even mainstream news sites like CNN and ABC spell the most simple words wrong. I'm not perfect either, but then again I'm not writing articles for a popular web site.
Other than that wonderful site, I'm here several times a day.

almostunbiased • Jun 15, 2008, 10:02pm •
Yes mike, but it wouldn't catch "alot" like you typed, which should be a lot.
People still need to just proof read, but we also shouldn't get too upset about it either. Sometimes we're just in a hurry and probably them too.

Hobbs • Jun 16, 2008, 06:56am •
I think you'll see your sequel because of BO numbers worldwide and video and rental sales. I was entertained when I watched it. I would have liked a little more story and they could have put that in seeing the movie is only about and hour and 20 mins long. That was the biggest surprise to me is seeing how short it was. I'm still not a fan of the shaky camera movies but I was expecting it coming from the guy who did the Bourne movies.

almostunbiased • Jun 16, 2008, 07:14am •
Actually he only directed the first movie. Greengrass actually did the second two, which were the real shaky ones.

Either way I want a sequel to this with more story and still some kick ace action.

1
Login to post a comment!