Movie Review
20 Comments | Add a Comment

0


JUMPER

By: Abbie Bernstein, Columnist
Date: Thursday, February 14, 2008

Unlike, say, Star Trek, which uses its transporter simply as a plot device, the space-bending abilities of David Rice (Hayden Christensen) are very much the point of Jumper. As an adolescent, David discovers he has the ability to “jump” from one place to another simply by deciding to do so. With no mother, an angry father and bullying schoolmates, there’s little incentive for David to stay at home – and not a lot of guidance to show him right from wrong. Small wonder, then, that David “jumps” far away from home, materializing inside bank vaults long enough to scoop up cash and then financing a very comfortable lifestyle. After eight years of this, though, David is confronted by Roland (Samuel L. Jackson), who not only knows about David’s ill-gotten income but is capable of preventing David from jumping. David escapes and winds up back in his Michigan hometown, where he renews his lifelong adoration of pretty Milly (Rachel Bilson), who is happy to be swept away by romance, only to start having serious doubts about just how David is able to do the things he does. Meanwhile, David learns a) that there are other jumpers out there and b) what the audience has known from the start of the film – that Roland is seriously dangerous and has a lot of help.

Jumper sets up a whole mythology about what it would mean to be able to get across the world in an eye-blink (beyond of course the fabulous savings on airfares), but director Doug Liman is in such a hurry to keep the pace ratcheting along that the more philosophical aspects of the story get short shrift. Even so, writers David S. Goyer and Jim Uhls and Simon Kinberg have adapted Steven Gould’s novel in a way that makes events easy to follow – we are shown rather than told so that we can understand what’s going on, what jumpers can and can’t do and at least broadly why Roland and his ilk find jumpers so objectionable. Liman and Co. avail themselves of the possibilities in the premise, so that we’re treated to some awesome locations that don’t just serve as backdrops, but rather become part of the plot, as in an Indiana Jones adventure.

Star Wars fans may get at least a minor charge of seeing Christensen and Jackson playing enemies again. Christensen is agreeable as a contemporary man with decent basic impulses if rather gray ethics about stealing, while Jackson is properly formidable. Jamie Bell is highly entertaining as a jumper who very reluctantly shows David the ropes and Michael Rooker is by turns vicious and poignant as David’s bewildered father.

There could be a lot more to Jumper than what we get – the film has been edited to an arguably over-lean 90 minutes, and the last act contains a twist that leaves us feeling like we’re being set up for a sequel – but if you can drop the questions and just go for the ride, it’s relatively good fun.



Related Products



Comments/Responses
1 2 > >>
wasradone • Feb 13, 2008, 10:30pm •
Doesn't sound too bad but stilll, I liked it the first time I saw it when it was called "Heroes" and Hiro could 'Jump' from one place to the other. Originality at it's finest.

daforce • Feb 13, 2008, 10:41pm •
Funny, I remember first seeing it in Superman 2. But then again....

All sarcasm aside, it was announced way back when Doug Liman jumped on board that this was to be a trilogy. So, I'm not surprised at the set up for a sequel. I'm looking forward to seeing it.

daforce • Feb 13, 2008, 10:41pm •
great, double post...:P

mlaforcer • Feb 13, 2008, 11:46pm •
That's funny, I liked it first when it was called Jumper because Jumper the book was out way before Heroes the t.v. show even showed up...So I guess in some respects it is Originality at it's finest lol...Try getting some facts before posting and save us the headache...
Oh ya, I look forward to watching this...

miko34 • Feb 14, 2008, 02:10am •
Is the twist perhaps Samuel L. Jackson being Hayden Christensen's father?

ponyboy76 • Feb 14, 2008, 02:25am •
Haha, good one Miko. Yeah, I`m looking forward to this. And really, if you are trying to talk about originality, I seem to remember a fuzzy blue demon looking dude being able to do this long before the book, Heroes or movie came out, so there! Is that Brimstone, I smell?
But seriously, this movie looks pretty damn good and I like Doug Liman. I wonder if Sam Jackson squeezes in a "Muthasfucka" or at least a "Mutha..." in this flick. I swear its in his contract.

rgtchtiger • Feb 14, 2008, 04:59am •
Isn't the book the first part of a trilogy too? I wonder if any sequels produced will be directly adapted from the books or simly use the titles of the books and call them sequels, a la the Bourne movies.

TheStormrider • Feb 14, 2008, 06:19am •
" Is that Brimstone, I smell? "

Isnt that from an old xmen cartoon about the danger room? Or a spiderman x man crossover cartoon?


goldeneyez • Feb 14, 2008, 06:44am •
...The Stomrider, I think the Brimstone reference would be regarding my favorite blue mutant "Ze Incredible Nightcrawler". I think Nightcrawler at least in the X-men Evolution incarnation ports through a hell like dimension between points a and b.

I thought he was cool before, but X2 kind of really put into perspective how powerful he could be if he chose to be so.

manjisan • Feb 14, 2008, 07:25am •
OK, I am geeking out, but that's what this site is for, eh? There is a HUGE fundamental difference between teleporting and time travelling; Hiro can go from one spot to another, yes, but he can also time travel. The Jumper character cannot time travel. Either way, after reading Jumper and Reflex, I am psyched to go check this out. Not expecting a mindblower but Liman is the man.

1 2 > >>
Login to post a comment!